July 07, 2005

London Bombings

What a fucking shitty day. 4 bombs were set off in London, so far killing at least 40 and wounding at least 300. This is fucking terrible. I knew sooner or later it was going to happen again, but I didn't suspect it would happen in London. I just don't understand how Islamic fanatics can justify murdering random innocent people? I just can't put myself in that state of mind. I can't think of anything that would make me so pissed where I would go out and do something to kill a whole bunch of random people.

And to the ones who have forgotten what it's like to see real terror on television, you are now reminded. I never forgot, but a lot of people have. The one's who denounce the war. Mostly the flaming liberal cocks. So now I'm going to pose a question to my readers: How do we stop this from happening?

Here's what I think. War is not the solution. It is an important aspect, but it is not the absolute. You can not kill every terrorist. You cannot stop people from hating us. Fighting a war on terror is like fighting a war on jealousy. With that being said, all we can do is control it. The security in America, excluding the borders, has been excellent. There have been no terrorist attacks on America since 9/11. Someone deserves a tip of the hat. Many people have been caught, and there have been many good saves. Jose Padilla, The Shoe Bomber, etc.

So what I think needs to happen is countries who are fighting in Iraq need to increase their security to massive levels before they get bombed my sackless Muslim cock lovers. I find it very sad to see that in almost every instance, a country waits for shit to hit the fan before they do something about it. So let this be a heads up to Australia, and the other nations fighting in Iraq. We absolutely cannot yield at all to these Islamic terrorist fucks. If they sense on ounce of yielding, they will be emboldened. We need to step it up and fight harder. We need to capture the leaders and put them to immediate death. Then when the new leadership arises, capture and kill those motherfuckers. We're America for Christ's sake. Why isn't this within our power?

Of course, religious extremism is to blame for this. The motherfucking Jihadists who hate us for a myriad of reasons. I would like to point out that even though I believe Islam is a religion of hate, there are indeed good Muslims. And they're coming out right away to condemn these attacks.

“'Those who carried this out are not Muslims and cannot be. I am a Muslim living in the UK. You can only imagine the extent of my shame and embarrassment at what has happened…The British are good, peaceful people who have done nothing to deserve what happened this morning', wrote Mustafa Yasri, an Egyptian living in London."

Good for you Mustafa. I'm very glad to see this, because this gives me some hope that not all Muslims are animals. This man has restored faith in me that maybe Islam isn't as bad as the Jihadists have proved it to be. He feels shame and embarrassment because of what his fellow Muslims did to London. This guy right here, is what you call a man. He isn't a fucking coward, he isn't a freedom hating, "death to America" chanting cocksucker. No, no. He is a model Muslim. This is the type of religious man I don't mind at all.

My sincere sympathy goes out to every single British person who has been affected by these atrocious attacks. I can't wait until the people who did this are found. Maybe Tony Blair will show the British what happens when you fuck with his country.

Has anyone else seen anyone besides the American Taliban fighter brought to justice? He wasn't even a part of 9/11. Has anyone seen anyone brought to justice for the attacks on 9/11? I've seen billions upon billions of our dollars being used to fight a way, but I haven't seen anyone's head on a fucking pole. Why aren't these senior members of Al Queda being tried in America? Where the fuck are they, huh? We've caught many of them. Osama still hasn't been caught. He's still fucking camels in the ass in some came somewhere.

Let's see who can deal with direct terrorism better. Tony Blair, or Dubya. My bet goes on Tony Blair. Have you ever seen him defending the Iraq war in front of the parliament? Their political system is very weird, but it requires the Prime Minister to get down and dirty and be directly confronted with real questions, and he is forced to give real answers. He's got balls. We'll see.

13 Comments:

Blogger Matt The Sick posted:

Well first off, let me state that I am not speaking of all liberals. I'm only speaking about a certain typical type. So please, don't take it personally. Trust me, you can make peace with violence. We're fighting animals, not children. They are born of the Koran. Read the Koran, cover to cover, highlighting any violent statements, and then let me know what you think. I'll tell you this: You will need more than one highlighter.

You are definitely right on the borders. But there are too many good reasons to keep the borders open for those fucking Republican douche bags in office. We have people working the shittiest of jobs, thereby helping our economy. And the best aspect: We have a huge number of people paying into the system and they will never get their turn to get their benefits. I think it's wrong, and I'm just stating why they're still open. Plus, everyone needs the hispanic votes. So blame the hispanics who want their mexican cousins to live free from the 3rd world country of Mexico.

I also agree with you on the patriot act. If there were only some assurance, some prerequisite that really ensured it would only be used on suspected terrorists, I would support it. But there is no prerequisite in place, and because of my core constitutionalist values, I find the Patriot Act complete fucking bullshit. I do not choose to give up my freedom and liberty in exchange for safety.

If you're gonna claim crazy stats, then you need to cite these stats. I simply do not believe 20,000 civilians dead. I don't support the war, but I'd have to imagine that as an Iraqi, I would trade 20,000 people to be free from Saddam and tyranny. Pretty good trade, if you ask me.

Until further notice, I'm calling bullshit on the number of 20,000. But if you think they care about their fellow Muslims, you are sadly mistaken. They're fighting because they officially declared a Holy War on the US. You and me, buddy. Are you aware that anybody in Gitmo, and anyone who is part of the Jihad would slit out fucking throats if they had a second's worth of time and opportunity? They would us by our head, and cut through our neck until it was severed. So don't even think about defending these people. They want to kill you.

They want to kill you and me because of their fucking warped view of the Koran. The Koran, inherently is a violently hateful book. One can so easily be turned into a Jihadist because the Koran sets you up for being prime. Study the terrorists and their words, and you will come to understand their madness.

Thank you for the comment. I appreciate a liberal viewpoint around here in the midst of all the conservative assholes bashing me for my anti-religious views.

9:52 PM  
Blogger Matt The Sick posted:

Oops James. I replied to Joe's post and you posted while I was typing my reply, so don't think I was ignoring yours. Let me reply to your comment now.

You know, I'm sorry to say Joe but James makes a really good point when he says that you throw out "liberal free thinkers" and take somewhat of a backhanded swipe at people who don't agree with you. I call a spade a spade, and James is right on this.

And I had a strong feeling Joe was full of shit on the stats, which James so very nicely pointed out. So now my question is did Joe knowingly lie, or did he make an honest mistake by believing a stat from another source? If you purposely lied, then go fuck yourself. Exaggeration is lying. Period. Liberals do that much more of that than the conservatives do. However, I'm not sure if James is a conservative or not, but I'm thinking he's closer to be an independent.

I don't know Joe, I think James has you beat. He makes a lot of good points here and he cited his source, which is a sign of utter coolness.

You didn't really piss me off too much with your comment Joe, but you sure pissed James off. I can definitely understand his anger. Joe, you have to understand that you're either with America or against it in this war. This is unconventional warfare. It is nothing like we've ever seen before. Like James pointed out, they have no uniform and fight like a bunch of fucking pussies. When they do this, it makes it difficult to avoid causalities. Usually, the simple rule is: DON'T SHOOT PEOPLE WHO AREN'T WEARING A UNIFORM. You've got to understand that.

And don't forget that during the initial stages in the Iraqi War, the Baathists were using women and children as defense. They would send them our wondering in front of the tanks while the ones with guns shot from behind them. Keep their "guerilla" tactics in mind.

Thanks for the passionate comment, James. No matter what anyone is saying, I have a great respect for passionate speech. Even if someone passionately claimed to have raped an elf last night, I would respect the declaration if they delivered it in a powerful, passionate way.

10:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous posted:

I really don't understand how people who have ever taken a history course could say violence never solves anything. What a crock.

Matt and James, I think you guys are amazing! I wish I could articulate my views so well. I really appreciate the citing of sources. Too many idiots just believe "what they hear." Way to go!

12:25 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous posted:

I am not flaming you for having a point of view. Many brave men have died to protect it and I would fight for you to have it. What I am really worked up about is the fact that you try to justify the 911 attacks as self defense.
I am against war as a principal. Do I WANT to go to war no. Is it necessary at times yes, and I don't understand people who cannot see that. I am not flaming you for being anti war you have that right to that view. I will be honest with you I think we have gotten off track by invading Iraq. I think we should be focusing on utterly destroying Al Queda. But there are some things that you just cant oversimplify and spout as fact. Case in point War cant make peace. Have you ever heard of World War 2? For chrissakes it is the perfect example that there is a time to fight and it is 100% effective and caused quite a long peace. While I don't agree 100% with us being in Iraq we are there for better or worse so I support the troops fully and the country. And I will attack anywhere and with all my passion anyone who wants to justify terror because they have a certain world view and it doesn't jive with reality.

BTW the source you cite do you realize they hold the US accountable for all deaths in Iraq even those caused by the Insurgents? I would seriously question the numbers from a group that cant use the rational side of their brain any more than that.

2:11 AM  
Blogger Matt The Sick posted:

Lauren:
Violence DOES solve simple problems. But violence alone can't end terrorism. I don't think it can ever be ended. It can only be severely weakened and controlled. But you can't do that without a lot of violence along with a lot of other things.

And thanks for the compliments Lauren! I really really appreciate the kind words. Me and James have this neat gift of being able to take really, really complex thoughts and ideas in our head and putting them into words. A lot of it has to due with how we organize thoughts and sustain them so we can correctly express ourselves. Thanks a lot!

Joe:
I'm sorry Joe, but I just can't accept a statistic from a website named "www.Iraqbodycount.net". Sorry, but I'm more than sure it's biased and full of shit. Sorry man, I'm gonna need something more official and less left wing. And independent source. And absolutely no Guardian sources either.

Calling someone a free thinker isn't being elitist. Or calling yourself one. Free thinkers are what they are. It's just the truth. All of use three here can agree that we are all free thinkers and aren't being gripped by a religious ideology.

I know you weren't taking shots and I didn't take anything that you said as hostile or insulting at all. I hate Rush. I love Savage, but don't agree with a lot he says. Rush has zero credibility. Savage will criticize both parties. But that's off topic. People that listen to Rush religiously are brainwashed as far as I'm concerned.

As for war benefiting corporations... Yes, this happens. But to say we went to War so companies could make money is a conspiracy theory. And conspiracy theories are just that, theories. I understand you worked in the industry for 5 years, but I don't know what you mean when you say you know how the game is played. Could you be more specific about these claims? The link you posted was no good for me. Maybe the ABC site is having difficulties at this time.

I want to make this clear. I love conflicting opinions in my comments and I welcome all opinions. That is the point of blogging, and especially this blog. I love conflicting debate. And I thank you for contributing to that.

I don't think that war, and war alone is going to end terrorism. That is what I was saying. War is not the absolute solution. And I never called you an evil terrorist supporter. That was probably James. You posted in a reasonable and respectful way and I don't lash out like that when you deliver your message in a respectful way. I'm not calling you any names, Bud. Re-read my comments or something man. Check back in. This is good healthy debate.

James:
I agree with you 100%. Many many brave men have given our lives so we can talk like this right now without some Imperial Government shutting down my site and hauling us off to jail. I don't remember seeing Joe mention anything about 9/11. But it's late and I'm tired so I may have overlooked something.

I think in hindsight, it's obvious that going to war with Iraq was probably not a good idea. It was a mistake, and a big waste of time. But let's PLEASE not get into that subject. Please guys! The war is on and we're there so let's keep it to that.

And I agree 100% when you say we got off track, as I mentioned above. We need to concentrate on Al Queda 100%. Freeing the Iraqis, which is what it is now apparently, shouldn't have been a priority until we had Osama and his senior aides put to death.

War along cannot create peace. But I'd like to pose an interesting fact of history. What ended WWII and created peace within the nations involved? Little Boy and Fat Man ended that war pretty fucking quickly. Did it not? Maybe an extreme bombing could end it really quickly. Who knows. This isn't conventional warfare. This is something completely different. Just a thought, though.

I agree with your opinion on the stats, also. I'm just not buying it coming from a site with such an inherently bias name. If it came from an independent group, I would accept it.

Thanks for this good discussion guys. I'm loving it.

2:55 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous posted:

Hey Matt. I just find your link on Fifth Nail Blog's, liked your comments and decided to take a look.
I agree when you say that war is not the solution, because that doesn's prevent others from hatred, but I really don't see how more security is possible. It's a fact that countries only protect themselves after shit has happened, but it would be almost impossible to prevent these kind of attacks. So what's the solution?! I don't quite see one. These terrorists attacks are unexpected and in the worse possible places. The attack of March 11, in Madrid, was similar to yesterday. Nobody was expecting, and how would they prevent that without stepping on the shoes of democracy and freedom?

9:22 AM  
Blogger Matt The Sick posted:

Wow, I've really gotten behind on replying to comments today.

Prophet:
I think you make a good point. Apparently, fighting over disagreements is just a part of human behavior, and maybe there just won't ever be peace. I don't know. I know that you can't fight a war on a feeling.

They definitely are being isolated and destroyed, that is for sure. Fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, and disrupted the Al Queda network has helped tremendously. As for an actual end, I just can't come up with any real ideas because these extremists are fucking nuts.

Well, I know there are religious fanatics in the Christian religion, but there are 10 times that number in the Islamic faith. I know exactly why this is. Their book sets them up and makes it much easier for one to become an extremist. I know there are many many reasonable Muslims, and I'm not painting them all the same color. I'm just saying that because the Quran is so violent and hate filled, it's easy to see how they become extremists. Thanks for your comments prophet. I appreciate your imput.

Somnium:
I'm glad you liked my comments on Duncan's blog. A lot of people didn't though. It was pretty funny. I'm just as confused as you are on further security. And it is pretty impossible to protect ourselves from attacks like this without giving up our freedoms... and if we give up our freedoms and liberties for security, then I'd rather not be American. So when it comes down to it, just like you said, we have a choice between security and freedom. I choose freedom. Thanks for the comment, I really appreciate it.

flagirl:
Thank you very much for commenting! I appreciate you taking the time out to leave a few words. The religious people are so funny. They're so sensitive so it's really easy to get them all worked up. It's really fun for me. I've never heard of Dane Cook, but I will definitely check him out. I love comedians. George Carlin is one of my idols, and he has really inspired the way I write. If you listen to him and listen to me you'll see a lot of similarities in our deliveries. I'm very glad you enjoyed reading and had a few good laughs. Thanks for reading.

Amanda:
I'm glad you'll keep reading! I'm finding it difficult to keep up with replying to every comment, which I pride myself on, and finding good stuff to blog about. Usually, I just read news all day long until I read something that pisses me off and then I start writing. I just can't force anything, otherwise it comes of being sort of blah. Thanks for the kind words, they mean a lot and thanks for reading to you as well!

1:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous posted:

Joe I went back and read your original post and I misread what you said concerning 911 which is what set me off so for that I apologize.

I did look at the source you gave and it says right on the website they are attributing ALL deaths in Iraq to the US because they are a result of our invasion of a sovereign nation. I gave you another source in my above post that sounds like a much more reasonable number.

Haiti and Somalia were disasters and were not wars.
WWII is the most glaring example but there have been many times that violence caused peace and in the end the bad guys are willing to use it and of we are not then we will loose.

Again sorry for misreading the original comment.

5:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous posted:

Come on guys! Enough with the "us vs. them"-logics. There are several badguys here, most important: terrorists and the people behind western foreign policy. They are both to blame.

Concerning WWII: Most wars dont end, they only taken into other arenas and are fought by other means. Violence is a part of politics. Shouldn't that imply that there is something wrong with our political system?

4:30 AM  
Blogger Matt The Sick posted:

Anonymous:
Exactly right. Don't violate their freedoms. But watch them very, very closely. Give them all the freedom in the world, I don't care. Just as long as we know what they're doing, we're fine.

Joe:
First of all, I wanna say that I respect your opinions and I respect that you make them without being an asshole like many other liberals who want to see me die. So, I appreciate your attitude. Now let's talk brass tacks.

1. I didn't think you ever mentioned 9/11

2. I didn't look at the source, no. I really don't care about the civilian casualties to be honest. I care 100 times more about the American causalities. I feel deeply for every one of those guys. They're who I care about... Our boys out there fighting for our country. I care about them dying. I just don't care about the Iraqi causality count because the end, they will have all died for their country, and those civilians will be honored like the men in the Revolutionary war are today. They're dying for a damn good cause.

3. I don't think you totally understood my point. It wasn't just plain violence from America that ended WWII. It was the big shocker. Something that made the enemy say "OH FUCK THIS". We need to do that... But George Bush is too liberal to do it. It's the truth. He's a puppet.

4. You didn't piss me off at all. I welcome the debate. I love defending my opinions and even more than that I love when people challenge my opinions because unlike many people, I will admit when I'm wrong and I'll admit when someone I'm debating with has a point. I'm a stand up guy like that.

James:
You are also a stand up guy. I didn't expect anything less from you though. You're like my long lost twin man, I swear.

Anyways, does that number include Iraqis killed my suicide bombers? I mean, it must be nearly impossible to get a solid estimate as to how many civilians have been killed by Americans. I still don't think it matters though, because their deaths will be more than worth it. They'll have the freedom we have, and I think that's pretty cool to see the black turn to white like that.

Anonymous:
There definitely are several bad guys. We aren't being led properly. Our political system is a fucking mess, and I blame it on the mentality of the congress and the senate. They just don't do their jobs... They do what will get them reelected. It's nothing but fighting... I mean, I wish these elected officials who disagree would just sit down and come to a middle ground instead of what they do now.

I don't know about most wars never ending. I mean, when you think about it, an army is controlled by its leader, not necessarily its country. So in essence, in any war, it's 2 leaders fighting and not 2 countries. So because of this, I think often times wars do end. But when you add in the religious element... the wars never do end. Case and point: Israel VS Palestine

4:50 AM  
Blogger Matt The Sick posted:

I find that very interesting. Of course... Nothing will ever be done about it. And your quote is fucking great. I've never heard that before but it's really good. I love it.

1:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous posted:

Terrorism is a tricky keyword. What "we" saw in London, is terrorism, but contrarily, what "others" saw is war. For example, USA fights in Iraq for years, for what, for giving "freedom" to Iraqi people, that's at least what American declared, so it's a War. But, for some people, it's nothing but terrorism since Americans kill innocent too.

Another example, in 1994, Rwanda had a Civil War, and Hutu killed more than 1 million Tutsi in 3 months. It is well known that France and Belgium supported Hutu, so is this war? or terrorism? It depends on which side you are at.

You can't just name the action as "terrorism" when innocent got killed, because innocent people are killed every day, especially in wartime.

Take it or not, for me, there is a war going on between East and West, for centuries. And I am shamed of being a part of it as a peaceful human being living on this planet.

8:05 AM  
Blogger Matt The Sick posted:

Terrorism is the intentional killing of innocent civilians. The deaths in Iraq are casualties of war. There's a huge difference.

You're sort of saying that terrorism is when innocent people die, but you're forgetting the intention and that is the most important part. Intention is everything.

The West is not at war with the East. Islam is at war with Infidels.

11:17 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

My Photo
Name:
Location: Beverly Hills, Florida, United States

I'm Matt The Sick and I am a loud mouth. I am slowly taking over the world. Keep reading about my adventures and my brutal exposure of the truth.