Monkey Fuck Loves Intelligent Design
After a fairly hefty hiatus, I am back in my throne and ready to type. I wonder if I still know how to do this. After a wonderful vacation at Disney World, which eased a lot of my anger, and a dog crisis, I'm feeling a bit uneasy. Let me try to remember how this goes...George Bush is at it again! No... That's not right. Hmm... George Bush has his head up his ass! Grr... That's not right either. Wait a minute, I got it! George Bush, the monkey looking motherfucker is not only the biggest fucking idiot, who may actually be retarded, to have been elected president, but he also supports the idea of intelligent design being taught in schools. Ah, that definitely hit the spot.
In my groove now, I must cite this Fox News story which covers some goofy ass event Curious George was at. Some low-level douche bag reporter for some shitty obscure newspaper decided to ask him about intelligent design.
But before I talk about his response, I want to talk about intelligent design. In modern society, in 2005, Evolution is taught in schools. The brilliant scientists and smart men of our world have concluded that Darwin's theory of evolution explains everything. But from behind the curtain enters Science's arch nemesis: Religion.
The religious folk combat this. Back before Darwin, Creationism was taught. Until it was banned, of course. But the general education of most Americans is Creationism. That is the darkside of science. It is the "science" that says God, a fictional character, created everything. Their evidence? The 2000 year old book.
So after the teaching of Creationism was banned, the religious folk needed something new. Out from the next curtain comes a new enemy. This guy's name is "Intelligent Design". Nice name. And he is suspiciously dressed in the same clothing as Evolution. Those religious folk are sneaky.
Intelligent Design is the reformed version of Creationism. Is doesn't specify who created everything. It only has the idea that there is an intelligent designer. This is brain food for retards.
To be more thorough, The National Academy of Sciences have said that intelligent design or any claim of supernatural intervention in the origin of life is not and cannot be a science because their claims cannot be tested by experiment, and cannot propose any new hypotheses of their own. Basically, it's such a fucking crazy idea that it just can't be considered a science because it is untestable. All Intelligent Design does is find gaps within Darwin's Theory of Evolution and fill them with their own religious speculation.
On to Monkey Fuck Bush. When asked about Intelligent Design being taught in schools, he said: "I think that part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought. You're asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, the answer is yes." Nice try, asshole.
What a fucking pussy way to support intelligent design. The fucking coward. He can't even come out and say what he believes. He can only give some half-assed remark that makes no fucking sense. I don't remember learning about Communism in 4th grade. I don't remember learning about the "different schools of thought" when it comes to life after school. I mean, if someone would have told me in middle school how much money drug dealers make, I might have considered a life a crime.
That's a perfectly logical point to make. And using Monkey Fuck's point of view, I'll clarify my point. When I was in school, all I ever heard was "Goto College." That's what everyone is taught. Goto college. Well, it just happens to be a fact that many people become filthy fucking rich and successful by not going to College and selling illegal drugs. I was never taught this alternative. It was never even mentioned. So according to Mr. Bush, he would support this. Right? I mean, obviously his point is learning about "different schools of thought" in public government funded schools is a good idea.
Checkmate cock lover. Of course he wouldn't agree. Because he's spewing monkey shit from his monkey mouth. What a crazy bitch. He supports intelligent design. Unbelievable. The President of the United States of America is a sheep. I'd take Nader over this shit. This type of thing scares me. The guy in charge of just about everything being a sheep. It's a very scary thing to me. I feel a whole lot less safer after reading this article.
Now here's my simple argument for Evolution over Creationism or Intelligent Design. I haven't been calling President Bush "Monkey Fuck" for no reason. You see, all the evidence and proof of evolution is shown just by looking at the picture above. This is no special picture. I took it from the Fox News story about Bush signing the CAFTA bill. It's a random, new picture.
Take a look, and what do you see? A fucking monkey. No man who I have ever seen looks more like a monkey than our president. This is no coincidence. His father was George Bush. His father was not a monkey. At least that I know of. His father looks like a fucking monkey too. Obviously, his gene pool isn't as evolved as most. What more can I say? He looks like a fucking monkey and that alone supports the idea of evolution. It's just hilarious that he proves it just be standing there and looking. That's all he has to do. His own face is a glaring contradiction to his asinine words.
It's like asking a black guy "So Mr. Black Guy, what do you think, do you believe it's true that some people actually have black skin?" And then Mr. Black Guy says, "Well dawg, I uno. I mean, I know there's lots of differin shades of culuz out there on you know, human bein's and shit, but I ain't too sure if there's anyone who axually gots black skin. It's a good idea doh, there cuh be."
There we go. When you put Monkey Fuck's assinine comments in the proper perspective, it's very easy to see just how fucking stupid he is. How can he possibly look at his fucking Chimp looking self in the mirror and actually believe that Intelligent Design is even a minor possibility? I mean, even his fucking name is primitive. "Bush" You just know that's been around since the caveman days. He's a fucking primitive, unevolved man and he himself is the biggest proof of Evolution. And he supports Intelligent Design.
But it all makes sense. Because he's so primitive, because he's so unevolved, because his fucking head is still so ape-like, his brain is also unevolved. And therefor, evolution explains why he would actually believe such a stupid fucking thing. It all makes sense, and the puzzle has been put together. I need a fucking medal.
posted by Matt The Sick at 9:46:00 PM
19 Comments:
Matt read this article about the Evolution in the eyes of the Church.
The Church is on your side.
http://www.zenit.org/show/visualize.php?language=english&sid=74786
"The Church has no "doctrine" on evolution, any more than it has a doctrine on tectonic plates or a magisterial teaching on how human consciousness arises from the electrical firings inside the neurology of the brain. These matters are both beyond the competence of the magisterium and are irrelevant to salvation, anyway.
Pope John Paul II said in his now-famous letter to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences in October of 1996 that "evolution" can no longer be considered merely a "hypothesis" because so much data have now come in to confirm the theory.
Some Darwinians like to hijack the word "evolution" for their own atheistic purposes.
If "creationism" means six-day creation as a few Christian fundamentalists still hold, then there is no chance in the world that the Catholic Church will join that cause."
This is Good News Matt.
"But "creationism" can also refer to the total ontological dependence of the universe on God's creative act of will, and nothing in the theory of evolution can threaten that essential doctrine of the Catholic faith.
If evolution simply means "descent with modification," then I would agree that evolution must be regarded as confirmed by scientific "fact".
Defined in that way, the theory of evolution claims that all life began about 3.5 billion years ago as a single-celled, self-replicating organism from which we are all descended.
Everyone once began his or her existence as a single-celled organism.
Let's not forget that the biological basis of the Church's opposition to abortion is based on the single-celled origin of human life.
Now Darwinism asserts not just the fact of "descent with modification"; it also claims to know the "how" of evolution: Evolution occurred, it claims, by means of something it calls "natural selection." Again, if that term is strictly defined, it simply means that only those organisms that reach reproductive age get to transmit their genes; and if those genes were somehow "responsible" for helping that organism reach reproductive age, then that "helpfulness" will likely contribute to later success as well. As with the doctrine that all life began as a single-celled organism, I hardly see how such an obvious insight can be regarded as controversial.
But then again, we have to ask: How much does the concept of natural selection actually explain the "how" of evolution?
The importation of that concept (natural selection) into human relations has been nothing but an unmitigated disaster for the 20th century:
Karl Marx, John D. Rockefeller and Adolf Hitler were all enthusiastic Darwinians.
For that reason, any application of Darwinian principles outside the restricted sphere of organic evolution is not only not "accepted as scientific fact" but that it has also been massively disconfirmed by history."
Objectivity results from the use of the scientific method without philosophic or religious assumptions in seeking answers to the question: Where do we come from?
We believe objectivity will lead not only to good origins science, but also to constitutional neutrality in this subjective, historical science that unavoidably impacts religion. We promote the scientific evidence of intelligent design because proper consideration of that evidence is necessary to achieve not only scientific objectivity but also constitutional neutrality.
The theory of intelligent design (ID) holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause rather than an undirected process such as natural selection. ID is thus a scientific disagreement with the core claim of evolutionary theory that the apparent design of living systems is an illusion.
In a broader sense, Intelligent Design is simply the science of design detection -- how to recognize patterns arranged by an intelligent cause for a purpose. Design detection is used in a number of scientific fields, including anthropology, forensic sciences that seek to explain the cause of events such as a death or fire, cryptanalysis and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI). An inference that certain biological information may be the product of an intelligent cause can be tested or evaluated in the same manner as scientists daily test for design in other sciences.
ID is controversial because of the implications of its evidence, rather than the significant weight of its evidence. ID proponents believe science should be conducted objectively, without regard to the implications of its findings. This is particularly necessary in origins science because of its historical (and thus very subjective) nature, and because it is a science that unavoidably impacts religion.
Positive evidence of design in living systems consists of the semantic, meaningful or functional nature of biological information, the lack of any known law that can explain the sequence of symbols that carry the "messages," and statistical and experimental evidence that tends to rule out chance as a plausible explanation. Other evidence challenges the adequacy of natural or material causes to explain both the origin and diversity of life.
Intelligent Design is an intellectual movement that includes a scientific research program for investigating intelligent causes and that challenges naturalistic explanations of origins which currently drive science education and research.
Matt, stop being an obstacle to my endorsement.
I endorsed the teaching of "intelligent design".
Life is so complex that it must be the product of a "higher intelligence."
It is a culture war between Creationists & Darwinians.
Both groups went to the extreme.
Creationists believe in the biblical account that God created the universe and everything in it in six days. (That's ridiculous).
These Creationists take the Bible literally.
The Church is against this.
Darwinians like to hijack the word "evolution" for their own atheistic purposes, to prove that the Bible has no credibility. (That's ridiculous).
The Church is against this.
The story of Creation is metaphoric. You can't take it literally. So, creationists must shut up their mouth.
Darwinians should not use evolution--which can no longer be considered merely a "hypothesis" because so much data have now come in to confirm the theory-- to bash religions and promote atheism.
Anthony
You confuse the shit out of me. I'm glad to see that the absolutely evil John Paul II at least did ONE good thing. I am very pleased to see that. Way to go.
Intelligent Design
Neat, I've got someone posting official words, or an actual official is commenting. I'm very happy with this. Where to begin?
Seeing you use the word "constitutional" twice literally made me cringe. Let's not forget here, Intelligent Design is the domesticated version of Creationism. It is nothing more than a product that you're trying to get approved, so you can brainwash children.
With that being said, to say Intelligent Design is a theory without religious philosophy is simply a lie. It's not believable. At all. The ID Theory isn't testable. Just give it up. All you can do is bribe local county commissioners and congressmen.
There is absolutely no scientific evidence of intelligent design. None. Please do not bastardize the word "science". That's a special word, and it shouldn't be used lightly.
Your real objective is to not just achieve "constitutional neutrality." This is bullshit. What you seek to achieve is a version of creationism that is so vague that it will be allowed to be taught in public schools. That is what you want. Why not just come out and say it, instead of lying? Because vagueness is your entire tactic.
You call evolution an undirected process? As of this is some sort of downplay. I don't think so. You see, it IS an undirected process. The same as everything else in the universe. Everything in the entire universe is directed by one thing: its own self. If it has no self, then it is undirected. Evolution describes the direction of EVERYTHING. It IS directed. It is simply the combined direction of all species and all living things over the course of millions of years. Not 6 days. HEH HEH
Intelligent design is no science. If anything, it's in the same club as road trip games. I spy, anyone? Punch buggy? Wood chuck? Bingo? One eye? Intelligent Design? Yay, that's play that. What you do is, you look at a science book and you find things that are so neat that it seems someone made it.
Just saying that is insane to me. You have no science. It's a game. Period. You can apply a science to a game, but it doesn't make the game itself a science. CHANCE is a science. Figuring the odds of landing on Boardwalk in your next 5 turns is a science. But creating that figure does not and would not make Monopoly a science. Monopoly is a game, and so is Intelligent Design.
ID is controversial because only the most ignorant among humans actually believe it. It's so asinine, that people because outraged when they hear of such ignorant banter. Can't you see the forest in the trees?
Oh please. Don't call intelligent design "an intellectual movement." It is nothing close. It's brain food for retards. It is the product of religious fanatics hating science, and is nothing more than an advocate for religion being taught in schools. You know as well as I do that it's pretty hard to believe in God when you are taught that he didn't make the world. Move over, science is taking over. Bitches.
Dubya
I am honored to have had your comment on this post, sir. I do appreciate your time. Life is only "so complex" to the simple minded. And the simple minded shouldn't be able to vote.
Anonymous
It goes deeper than that. It's not really a culture war between Darwinism and Creationism. It's more so a battle between Religion and Heretics. Science proves the bible wrong, and the religious folk can't stand it. Because if only one small detail is incorrect in the bible, that makes the entire book vulnerable to criticism. It's the same reason people are still fighting to claim the SUN revolves around the EARTH.
I think that the average Atheist may use Darwinism as ammo against religion. But I am not in that group. I am simply a believer in the truth and science. I'm progressive. I live in 2005. Not in 1005. The Bible, when it comes to science, has absolutely no scientific value. It does however have spiritual value.
I don't think as many people as you believe use Darwin's Theory to bash religion, simply because they're atheists. I am not arguing for evolution. I'm arguing against Intelligent Design. If you read my site often, you will know that one of my strong beliefs is progression. I hate the lag of human progression. And it's religion that causes it.
Thanks for the comment. I appreciate it.
Anonymous
I know I am "one sick dude". Hence the name of the site. The Sick. I don't even have to try hard. It's neat. How am I going to rot in hell? I thought when someone goes to hell, they just sort of stand there and burn but don't die. Am I just going to be a walking skeleton? And if this is the case, wouldn't that be pretty awesome? How could anyone tell anyone else apart? Would I have a job there?
You confuse me. I was just always under the impression that when you went to hell, you didn't burn. You just felt it. That sneaky bible. It lacks a whole lot of logic.
Matt, don't allow these Anonymous steal your peace.
Ignore them.
Galileo said: "The Book of Faith and the Book of Nature are two avenues that lead to the Truth. They should never be in conflict with each other."
He added: "The Bible tells you how to go to Heaven not how the heavens go."
Galileo was a believer. Yet, the people of his time persecuted Him because they took the Bible literally.
Science is not a threat to the Bible.
It is a threat to people who lack Faith.
Angel Anthony loves Science and believes in the Bible.
What's up Matt?
It's me, Pastor Jim. (I'm really not a pastor, nor a Jim, but anthony gave me the title, and its kinda catchy. By the way, none of the previous anonymous' were me. Whether or not I believe in evolution, of course not. I am a Christian, after all. Atleast not to the extent that we all came from a single cell organism. I believe things mutate and change over years, but I don't believe my ancestors were monkeys. Do I believe they should be allowed to teach it in schools? Sure... Intelligence is the key. The more we know about things, the more we can decide for ourselves what we choose to believe. I do know what you are saying about Bush, though. I do like him, but he does look like a monkey. I had a friend in middle school over one time after school. After supper, he fell asleep on our couch and I called to my Mom. "Hey Mom, come here and look. If there is any proof that we come from monkeys, he is it." This kid seriously looked like a monkey. By the way, he is a white kid, so I don't want any races getting offended.
Anthony is confusing isn't he? You never know what he believes in. He says he believes in science. I've tried to tell him that it has been scientifically proven that during communion at a catholic church, the cracker still remains just a cracker after the priest turns it into "Christ's Body." I have a problem with people who ride the fence on their beliefs. Either you believe it full heartedly, or you don't.
Oh well, I enjoyed your post again. Thanks.
PJ
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Pastor Jim,
Who cares if you were the previous anonymous or not?
I don't know how people like you, living in the 21st century, and you do not trust scientific research.
Your ancestors were monkeys, believe it or not.
Pride won't help. Just admit it and accept it. In other words, "Embrace it".
You don't seem to be intelligent to speak about "intelligence".
Anyway, it seems that your comment here is not directed to Matt but to Angel Anthony.
If we give scientists your comment to analyse it, they will say: "hmmm, this little pastor Jim used Matt and his post to send a message to a guy called Angel Anthony and to attack the belief of the Church."
Pastor Jim, I tell you, you cannot put a wedge between me and Matt.
Your point concerning the Body of Christ is ridiculous, because the Church teaches that the host becomes the Body of Christ IN FORM OF BREAD. The substance is the Body of Christ. The Form is Bread.
So the Church has no problem with science here.
Catholics believe in the BODY OF CHRIST because Jesus said so and because the Early Church believed so.
Your point shows your lack of information on the teaching of the Church.
I will give you my wisdom (I am 42 years old)
"Learn about something before you attack it."
Finally, I ask you to pray for your monkey ancestors. Probably, they need your prayers.
Evolution is not a threat to Faith.
Truth is truth.
Science & Faith lead you to Truth.
If you reject one of them, you keep yourself away from TRUTH.
But it seems that you like to see Science & Faith divorced.
They may have problems with one another, but they still "two avenues that lead to Truth" as Galileo said.
This will just take a minute, Matt.
Anthony, your ego must be the size of this planet we live on. I did not say one thing to you in my post to Matt. I did say one thing *about* you, but that was just referring to what Matt had said previously about how he doesn't get you.
Our ancestors are monkeys? You are a so-called Christian? God created us in His image. Therefore, you believe God is a monkey? Wow!!! You do baffle me. Also, you now believe that the cracker is just a cracker? That it is symbolic? Wait till your pope hears this.
As far as me not believing in science, where did you read this? I said I don't believe in evolution. The surgery that saved my father's life was a good thing. The pills that keep my blood pressure down are good. I did not say that I am against science. The initial post states that there are holes in the theory of evolution. If it were proven undoubtably, my response might be different. But, until then, my belief stays the same.
If you think "I" am driving a wedge between you and Matt, you are worse than any of us thought. As for being 42, how old am I? Do you honestly think you are wise because of your ripe old age of 42? You sure do not prove yourself as an intelligent man. You seem very confused, and may God help you become more focused on your "journey."
I'm sorry, Matt. I honestly don't want your blog to be about me and anthony.
Later,
PJ
Pastor Jim,
You are funny.
Of course your ancestors were monkeys.
What's wrong with the image of a monkey? Do you think you're better than a monkey?
Again, pride.
Do you think God created our FORM in His image?
Is that your understanding of God's image, to have a human ear, mouth, eyes, nose, etc...?
To be in God's image means to have a WILL, REASON, INTELLECT. That's what make us in the image of God, whether we look like monkeys or like humans.
The so-called cracker-- I call it host-- transformed into the BODY of CHRIST is not symbolic. It is REAL. Without it, I wouldn't have the wisdom I have.
If you have blood pressure, I recommend you take your pills + you go to a priest, confess your past sins, and spend every day one hour before the BODY OF CHRIST.
You will see how you will be healed.
I am wise because of Him.
You can also be wise if you stay with Him.
Good night sweety.
Matt, I was amused by the photo of Dubyaman.
Was feeling lucky on Google for "morphing George Bush to a chimpanzee" and got http://www.smirkingchimp.com/
Heck, the Net is really something!
Anthony
No one's stealing my peace, bud. Galileo was indeed a genius of his time. It's sad that he probably lived in fear every day of being stoned for his brilliance.
Pastor Jim
When I think "Pastor Jim" I think of some crazy pastor fellow who lives on a farm with hundreds of animals. It's kind of a neat nickname. I'll keep calling you Pastor Jim or PJ. Just because I think it's cool. I knew which were you and which weren't. Adding the little "PJ" at the end of your comments is good though, just to be sure.
I respect your belief and your disagreement. You're probably a lot older than me, and there's no point in debating it since neither of us are going to change your mind. But I do appreciate hearing your opinion because discussion is fun. Also, the story of your friend sleeping on the couch is interesting.
I'll tell you a neat little innocent story that you made me think of when you pointed out the kid was white because you didn't want to seem racist. When I first saw gorillas (not monkeys or chimps) at the zoo, I remember thinking "Wow, those Gorillas REALLY look like black people." Not the other way around. I saw black people much more often than I saw gorillas.
Thanks for reading and commenting PJ. I do appreciate it.
Anthony
He just disagrees Anthony. Some people just believe in what they believe, not matter how wrong you think they are. You think PJ is crazy for his beliefs on Evolution. I think you're crazy for your beliefs in religion. It's the same sort of thing. It's best to just accept it and let it go.
I don't think he's trying to put a wedge between anything. He's just discussing a topic, that's all. You might be getting a bit too defensive.
PJ
One point I have to make is you CAN be a Christian and believe in Evolution. So I don't think it's right to play the "You call yourself a Christian" card because someone believes in Evolution. One can be a man of science and a man of faith at the same time I believe.
I also further understand your position on Evolution, and like I said, it's completely respectable. It's a controversial topic, so there's always gonna be those who agree and disagree. Don't be sorry about debating Anthony. It's completely cool, and it's fun to read. It's no problem at all.
Anthony
Anthony makes a good point. I mean, monkey's have ears, nose, mouth, penis, balls, etc. Our forms are identical. However, is it possible that in the Bible, when it says humans were created in God's image, that it actually means not our physical self, but our emotional and actionable self. What we do, what we think, how we think it, etc. Perhaps that's what it means, and perhaps God has 18 arms and legs and has 25 eyeballs.
You called him Sweety, Anthony. A bit creepy. But good comment.
Shastrix
Hilarious. I've seen a bunch of stuff like this before, and I was thinking of using something like this for this post but I really just wanted to use a random recent picture because it helps support my point more that he ALWAYS looks like a monkey.
Thanks for the link. Pretty funny.
"These matters are beyond the competence."
Anthony, you need to fully comprehend what you tell us to read before you start using it as the backbone of your reasoning. Even this cardinal says the pope is ignorant on the situation. If you read it clearly, it just backs up my problems with catholicism. He pretty much says, we don't know what to believe, so we just stay out of it.
He also states that the pope does not believe in evolution as in the Darwinism teachings. He says "this very short letter brought some misinterpretations of its own in its wake-because of the obnoxious way some Darwinians like to hijack the word 'evolution' for their own atheistic purposes." He believes the same thing as I do, anthony. He believes the life of a human being comes from a single cell organism. He is saying how "obnoxious" people (anthony) hijack the word "evolution" for their own beliefs (we come from monkeys).
Anthony, do you believe Adam and Eve were monkeys? If you do not, then you can't believe we come from monkeys.
This is where I have to disagree with you too, Matt. I don't think you can be Christian and believe in evolution because of Adam and Eve. God made Adam and Eve. He made them to rule over the animals. He did not let them evolve into humans. He specifically made Adam from the dust and Eve from Adam's rib. I can understand if you don't believe in the Bible this sounds retarded, but if you are a Christian (follower of God) you believe this story.
It is true, we have a lot of similarities to apes. We are obviously the more dominant in the human vs. ape comparison. If God meant that the ape was in His image as far as "will, reason, and itellect", does that mean that we are now better than God. We have more reasoning skills and are more intelligent than apes, so are we now above God's image? It is just an anti-Bible belief. Therefore, anti-Christian.
Later,
PJ
FYI...
Great book to read on the subject.
The Blind Watchmaker by Richard Dawkins
A good read but he does use Darwinism to slightly bash religion.
Matt, I am a firm believer in spirituality, but not in religion. Sri Sri Ravi Shankar* has given the best comparison between religion and spirituality. He says that spirituality is the banana and religion the peel! My corollary to this is how fast the peel dries up when there is no banana inside.
I'd like you to read "The Incredible Design of the Earth and Our Solar System" at http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/designss.html.
Thanks.
* More on the Guru of Joy at http://shastrix.blogspot.com/2004/02/guru-of-joy.html
know that i am a 37 year old woman with 7 children. I have been doing the research of myself in full as to neighbors as to the wolrd with the belief of God and love in my heart. I have a genius mind and body not understood by fitness trainers. I am just an entertainer but I have an extreme amount of gifts in many many areas. I will be back to post my comments after reading this page. I looked up the subject "intelligent design" after finding an article in Esquire magazine. There are some stregnths within intelligent design but the government needs to learn more about higher intelligence in humans through accidents like myself who have had to learn everything they touched from the day they were born....and not from books, from just walking alone and talking to the higher power....call it what you want.
i am the same woman with the seven kids. do not deny the ancient literature of the bible. the generations below have a hard time understanding the literary terms. 7 days is 7 periods of time. science and the word go hand in hand. keep seeking but learn to have your emotions in order and multiple as many talents within. in fact work on more. you will see what it does to make the mind whole. I have an extensive lifetime of research to know that you must live in the light in order to come to a higher place of knowledge. I am not into religion but I have tried many many many types of churches and found politics and incorrect explainations for what they thought the word was saying. this Is going to be a different generation when people learn how to have much higher intelligence. How we began is not nearly as important as to where we are heading, but knowing that a higher intelligence created us gives he who gave it to us respect and this alows to see for ourselves. Study everything around you not books!! Life all that is god in it. this includes your soul, learn about yourself from your skin to your toes. This teaches you calculous of the brain not by numbers by all that is in the earth. How can you solve a problem without all of the components. school only teaches you basic things. Learn it all every day of your life. I have been for 37 years in thought every day without much of a break and when you hear of me it is because I went on blind faith and trusted and then I was entered into a different place of higher intelligence. granted inventions, wrote over 400 songs, and much much more. worry about yourselves inside and out the rest will open up. do not follow anything that is being taught today only see what it is about. EXAMPLE: i took courses at college After I learned the subjects from life and I was Presidents list! Learn how everything is made from man, wood, concrete, clothes. I do it all. I have had my hands in it all for all these years. Books are only little guides of a beginning or assistance. Degrees come from books, but knowlegde comes from life experience and the more you study everything that is existant the more you will have in your computer brain to digest. this includes people and personalities and playing each part. It includes overcoming fear, heck I even went to the police academy when I learn about mystery. At one point I studied to be a vet oh and a dancer, gymnist, model, I fish and hunt, sports too. all of it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Taste it all and watch what happens. I even changed the shape of my bones in my hips. I played dermatologist and hairdresser. It is for us all. The more you have entered into the brain the more you are capable of. I will never preach but I do have faith even when times seem down, I am afterall human but I am very different. Amanda Jane
Post a Comment
<< Home