The Leader of Our Enemies

I will talk about this only because it gives you an even deeper insight into the psyche of our enemies. The people that struck us on 9/11, the people we're fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, the people who behead civilian US workers in Iraq, including burning their bodies and hanging them from a bridge. Where does it all come from? Why do they do this? What does it all mean, Basil? Islam.

Islam is the key to it all. I don't care what anyone says because I read the Quran and I know. They can call it a religion of peace all they want, but when it comes down to it, the source of the problem is Islam. This is my position, and it's the truth. I know we were taught in school that prejudice is bad. I know we were taught that judging an entire group of people based on one factor is wrong. This isn't what I'm doing.

I judge the religion of Islam and I do not judge the Muslim, but only their ability and risk to be easily turned into an extremist based on the absolutely vicious teachings of the Quran. Let's get down to it.

Over at ArabNews.com, a very interesting article has been posted. The headline: Punishing Disobedient Wives... You know what's coming, don't you?

Now when I saw the headline, I was expecting some uppity Muslim douche bag to defend the atrocious words of the Quran, and to try and explain that you're not supposed to actually beat your wife. Wrong. The article is actually pro wife-beater. The writer comes out against people who don't interpret a certain passage properly. He basically says you're actually supposed to beat your wife, which the Quran says to do in plain terms, and not throw her out of the house which is what moderate Muslims do apparently. On to the article.

I find it unacceptable when some people twist the meaning of a particular verse in the Holy Qur’an — especially the one which permits a husband to beat his disobedient wife.

Children are disobedient. Cats are disobedient. Dogs are disobedient. Women are not disobedient. Women bitch, and that's that. In America, it is considered extremely wrong to beat children, cats, dogs, or women. Even if they are moody and never seem to be happy. It's just the way it is. We still love them, despite their sometimes insane logic. We do not beat them because of it. Not beating your disobedient wife is an unheard of concept to this man though.

The verse — number 34 in Surah IV — reads as follows: “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women because Allah has given them one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore, righteous women are devotedly obedient and guard in (the husband’s) absence what Allah would have them guard. And to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first) and (then) refuse to share their beds (and last) beat them (lightly), but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means of annoyance.”

Beyond fucking sick. First of all, I love how this asshole adds in his own paraphrasing. He adds "lightly" after the commandment of beating your disobedient wife. Who is he to decide that Allah meant lightly or harshly? He's no one. He only added that "lightly" in there so his argument wasn't 110% fucked, opposed to 100% fucked. Regardless, the Quran very simply states to first yell at them nicely, then stop fucking them, and if they continue to disobey, then beat them. It doesn't say lightly beat them. It just says beat them. Do you people realize that this is the word of their God, and this is the mindset of Muslims? They don't pick and choose what to obey and disobey of their God's words. Unlike Christians, they actually live and die by their book. I'm speaking of the average Muslim versus the average Christian.

The beating which is only prescribed in the case of disobedient wives is intended to serve as a remedy in an unusual situation. If the husband feels the wife is behaving in a disobedient and rebellious manner, he is required to rectify her attitude — first by kind words, then gentle persuasion and reasoning. Beating as a last resort must never be understood to entail using a stick or any other instrument that would cause pain or injury.

No. Beating your wife is not a remedy for an unusual situation. Divorce or separation is the remedy. Isn't that a strange concept for the Muslims? You don't actually own your wife. Despite popular belief, every innocent person, or at least close to innocent person is a free person. No woman is ever owned by any man. But this is considered normal in Islam. This isn't just the case in the middle east. This is also the case of those kind Muslims you see running your local gas station. But hey, at least he denounces the use of sticks or instruments. He says not to use them because they would inflict pain or injury. But... It's OK to use your hand. Because that doesn't inflict pain or injury? What the fuck is this man talking about. Do you see the double-talk? He wants to defend his religion without exposing its viciousness because he too knows the truth and defends it anyway.

A rebellious woman who is not moved by kind words, persuasion and admonition is a woman of no feeling and must therefore be punished by beating. Psychiatrists tell us of people, including women, for whom a cure lies in beating.

What? Let me inform this asshole, along with every other sadistic Muslim of a sad, but true fact of life. Women very rarely respond to kind words, gentle persuasion, or denial of sex when faced with an "unusual situation." You ladies who read my site know this to be true, and you guys who read my site know this to be true. We love women and women love men, but there are just simple facts of life. Women complain a lot because men are assholes. It's just the way it is. All I guy can do is try to be less of an asshole while a girl tries not to complain as much. That's just a fact of life. Not in the Muslim world, though. A man is never an asshole. A man is superior and if a women should ever disobey him, she shall be beaten.

And then this little fuck has the nerve to bring psychiatry into play. He actually makes the absurd claim that psychiatrists say that women are cured by beatings. Maybe in your fucking fanatical, primitive, and unevolved middle eastern shithole "psychiatrists" will claim women respond to beatings. Sure they do. They respond by curling up and dying inside. But why would these lovely Muslim men care if that happened? Their women are only there to satisfy their animalistic need to fuck, and nothing more.

The controversy over the beating of disloyal and rebellious women is part of the campaign against Islam. If beating disobedient wives was advocated by Western scientists, it would have been widely supported by the same people who criticize Islam and special centers would have been set up all over the world to train husbands on how to beat their wives.

Hah. He tries to make a point. Here, his hate for the west and his love for an insane ideology emerges. He claims that if Americans advocated the beating of "rebellious" women, then we would set up special centers to train husbands how to beat their wives. This is just so fucking stupid. I don't even know what he's trying to say. The west supports good ideas, and tries to make sure everyone can perform them well? I don't know, maybe. Regardless, it's fucking stupid. He shows his true colors.

This is just a glimpse into the mindset of Muslims. This is normal behavior. This is OK. This is what you do. They actually beat the shit out of their wives about as often as a man might say "Will you please leave me the fuck alone." This is a normal occurrence. It's just the way things are in the Arab world. You beat the shit out of your wife when she's rebellious. When you do this, you're looked upon by your peers as normal and religious.

This is our enemy. This is just a glimpse into the way they think and see the world. This is normal. I cannot stress this enough. When something like this is deemed normal, and commanded by their holy book, is it so hard to understand why they might want to kill infidels? Infidels, being those who don't believe in their God. Is it so hard, just be reading that small passage, as to why they hate America? It's because their beliefs are considered radical, and their holy book is the only truth to them. Wake up, we're not fighting a war on terror. We're fighting a war on an ideology really. A feeling of hate caused by the teaching of the Quran. And it's that feeling of hate that drives a husband and father to fly an airplane into a building, committing the most honorable act he can imagine.

When you're fighting a war, you must identify the leader of the enemy. Osama Bin Laden leads Al Qaeda. Saddam Hussain lead his Baathist regime. The Taliban lead their forces along with Al Qaeda. But here's the truth that needs to be recognized if we're ever going to get out of this mess: Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussain, and the Taliban regime were all lead by one person. Allah. And Allah only exists in one form, and that is the Quran.

The Quran is the leader of the war on terror. It may not create an American hating extremist who's willing to kill for their cause out of every follower. What I am certain of is that it does create the possibility of an extremist who's willing to kill for their cause. Maybe 1-3% only become extremists. But out of a billion believers, this is an absolutely massive amount. It's an unorganized Army. And even the non-extreme Muslim has that seed in them, placed by the Quran to become an extremist who will kill.

Can we end Islam? No. Can we end the Quran? No. Can we kill Allah? No. The fact of the matter is, we're fighting a war on terror, and that's just an war that can't be won. You can't fight a religion. Hitler tried, and he's now deemed the most evil man of all time. It's something we could never do. Nor would I even want to see that happen. The only way is to reform the Quran and every Cleric who preaches it. But in the end, that can only achieve limited results.

My conclusion? We're fucked. We are fucked because logically, you cannot fight a belief. You cannot change 1-3% of a billion peoples' idea that we should all die. You can only sustain them, and deal with them the best we can. No more wars. Afghanistan was an absolutely essential war. Iraq would have been had the intelligence not been incorrect. I fully support the continuation of both wars. I truly hope that we are making a huge difference in the security of the United States by fighting these wars. There have been no attacks since 9/11, so that's a sign we're doing something right and that our men and women in Iraq and Afghanistan are keeping us safe. I think the focus should be on homeland security rather than fighting wars, though. I do think fighting the wars is essential, but above that should be homeland security. In the end, I think that will foil more plots than fighting the wars will. The military is the 1st line of defense and our intelligence community along with the FBI and every law enforcement agency in every county in the US are the last defense. And in the end, this is what matters. We don't want to get killed while we're out and about living our lives. And it's a fucking shame that we have to have that slight fear and that constant reminder of 9/11 in the back of our heads because of the attacks on 9/11 because of that fucking Quran. But remember, and this is my main point. The Quran is the leader of leaders of our enemy.