George Pataki is a Sadist

George Pataki, The Republican Governor of New York. What a fucking asshole this man is. You know, more often than not I give the benefit of the doubt to the republicans before the democrats. However, when insane shit like this happens, I throws me right back in the middle, wondering who is more insane.

George Pataki has used the powers vested in him to veto a bill that would have allowed pharmacies to freely distribute the morning-after pill without prescriptions. Why would he possibly veto such a bill? Why would this pill have to be prescribed in the first place? First off, let me describe the morning-after pill. Many people are misinformed on what this pill actually does.

There are a few different variations of the "morning-after pill", but they all have one thing in common. They contain very high doses of hormones, and sort of trick your body into thinking you're already pregnant. It is the same as birth control. It's just a high dose. This high dose must be taken within 72 hours, because that's how long it takes the spermy wormies to implant the egg. You can still take the morning-after pill after 72 hours, but then it would probably be considered a chemical abortion rather than sort of a "cock blocking" of the spermy wormy. I'll clarify, because this is important to the pro-life people.

If you take the pill within 72 hours, you are merely tricking your body, and preventing the sperm from implanting the egg. No harm, no foul. You're simply interfering with the impregnating process. Nothing is growing. However, after that 72 hours, something may be growing. We're talking a matter of millimeters here. You can still take the pill, and it can still be effective within a reasonable amount of time, and probably without negative effects. Massive doses of this hormone in the pill will cause an abortion, a miscarriage, a murder, whatever you want to call it. No matter how far along the woman is. Generally, if you take it within a week, you'll be fine. It's just that 72 hour mark that determines wether you're preventing birth in an emergency situation where some guy decided it was a good idea to cum inside you, or wether you're aborting a week old fetus, the size of a lima bean. More on all of this in a bit.

So that's that. However, I'm sort of speaking in a black market kind of way. Doctors will always tell you to never take it after 72 hours. Doctor Sick says that you'll be fine if you take it within a week. So what's Pataki's problem? What's his deal? What's his issue? What is wrong with a girl having the power to walk into a Walgreens and get the morning-after pill during her lunch break rather than make a doctor's appointment, call off work, spend a hundred bucks at the doctor, and THEN be prescribed the pill. What's wrong with cutting out the middle man? What happens if you fuck a guy on Friday night? The doctor is closed Saturday and Sunday. You are forced to goto the emergency room. If not, you're pregnant and you can't do shit about it at that point. Just because of the timing. So what the fuck is going on here? Enter insane Republican babble.

The CNN article goes on to say "Pataki, who had announced Sunday that he would veto the measure, said he was most upset that the bill did not require minors to see a physician. 'We can do better,' said the governor, who pledged to work with sponsors of the legislation to come up with a proposal he would sign."

Isn't that fucking lovely. It's the fucking minors who need this bill the most. What happens when 16 year old Michelle gets drunk and has sex at a party on Friday night. What does she do? She is forced to go tell her Dad how she got drunk and let 3 guys have sex with her. Right? Then Dad have the opportunity to beat the shit out of her. All because she couldn't just admit to being a fuck-up to herself and goto a Walgreens and get the shit she needs so she doesn't ruin her life by having a child at 16. Where is the fucking logic?

The pill isn't harmful. It isn't a dangerous pill. It isn't an abused pill. People aren't selling it on the streets. It's a fucking emergency contraceptive that is used when people realize they fucked up and they need to act quickly so they don't ruin their life with a child they can't take care of, thereby ruining that very child's life in the process. Why doesn't this elected leader of the most popular state in the entire nation get this? Enter shady motives.

Mr. Pataki isn't running for a 4th term as Governor. He has announced this. I wonder why that is. Could it be that he wants to focus all of his attention on the big 08? Many people, including the executive director of the New York chapter of Abortion Rights Action League believe it. And I believe it too. I've learned this: When politicians do absolutely senseless things, they are pandering to the senseless voter. The same as Hillary with her assault on GTA.

Pataki went on to say a few more interesting things, one of which I do sort agree with. But it's a confusing point."The governor said he wanted a limit on the number of pills that could be dispensed at one time and did not want men to be able to get them, as would have been permitted under the vetoed legislation. He also said the bill should require patients getting the morning-after pill to receive counseling on the health risks of unprotected sex."

One good point, and the rest is stupid fucking babble. Counseling? Give me a fucking break. I do sort of agree that men should not be allowed to get the pills. I don't like the idea of men being able to get the pill and slip it into a girls drink or food. However, what happens in a case where the woman wants the pill, but is too embarrassed to get it? This is a shady area, and a solution to this should have been in place in the legislation. It's not my fucking job to think of it. Like I said, that is a good point. But you can't say "no males". Besides, with a 72 hour time frame, why should a bitch have the right to say "your sperm is in me and I'm gonna have your baby and you will be attached to me for life" while she waits to be fertilized. I don't think that's fair at all. This is a confusing part of this issue.

I think that within those 72 hours, a guy has as much say as the girl does. This is in the same area as what happens when a girl you're having sexual relations with stops taking her birth control. Why should that man be responsible for a child he doesn't want when he was duped into creating it? I think legislation is needed here. I support a law when it effects someone's right to life, liberty, and property. A girl pulling a stunt like this, which I've seen happen a lot, effects all three. And it's perfectly legal. But no politician has the sack to do anything about it.

I'm just completely fed up with all of this shit. The pandering fake politicians. The fake democracy we live in. The old forcing the young to reproduce. Women popping out babies they can't take care of. Politicians forcing them to do so. Women getting pregnant in sneaky shady ways to keep their boyfriend. It's shit. Absolute shit. It's these fucking fake assholes like Pataki who fuck this Democracy up. There is absolutely no reason whatsoever to veto the bill. None at all.

The only reason to veto the bill is to make it harder for girls to not get pregnant. Why would you want to do that? Why would anyone want to make it harder for a girl who made a mistake, to fix her mistake? I find that absolutely sadistic and evil, and I hope Pataki drops dead in his bathroom.