Airplane Hysteria
This airplane hysteria is getting completely out of hand. In fact, I find it insanely ridiculous and the people who fly on planes in this country are out of their fucking minds.I see stories like this all the time, and these people are getting completely out of hand. I have my own solution for airline safety that will make it safer and give our government 100% responsibility for airline safety. If they can take the amount of money they do out of our paychecks then I think the can handle being in charge of securing America's airplanes.
For one thing, I believe it to be a matter of National Security for the federal government to be in charge of airline security. When crazy fucking Islamic facists are hijacking airplanes and flying them into buildings, attempting to blow them up with shoes and liquid bombs, I think it becomes pretty essential that an entity that isn't publicly traded be in charge. Although some would argue that the government is publicly traded, the fact remains that someone needs to be on that plane in uniform. Not just someone, a lot of someone.
At least 4 Air Marshals need to be on board every flight going into or out of the United States. Does that sound complicated? Tough shit. Collecting taxes is complicated and they manage that. Non-uniformed Air Marshals who are highly trained and who can spot true terrorist behavior. We also need Subway Marshals. We probably need them somewhere else that we haven't even thought of it.
The fact of the matter is that this bullshit has gone way too far. It's time for the government to step up and take control, in a non-Katrina way. We need the people with the power in charge now. When a pregnant woman can't bring her bottle of raspberry tea, which helps is needed for her morning sickness, on board, then something is fucked up. When a mother can't bring formula and milk for her newborn on the plane, something is fucked up. This country and the airlines are fucked up and the people who get elected need to be in charge. The people whose power is dependent upon doing a good job need to be responsible for air travel. This is the way democracy is supposed to work.
I can still see myself in my desk in 4rd grade. I was sitting in Mrs. Fox's glass, whose name later changed that year due to marriage. I had a blue social studies book and I can see myself in that desk in the layout of desks in that classroom. I remember all of us reading aloud all of the definitions of the various forms of governments in the world. I remember the Ms. Fox going into great depth when explaining democracy. I still remember my understanding, and I have that very same fundamental understanding. The People are in charge.
The People are in charge. That was my understanding then and that's how I feel now. It is the way it's supposed to be. The People elected the lawmakers. The lawmakers make the laws, and if more than half of those lawmakers agree on the law, then the law is passed and it goes to the President who has final say. If he likes it, he signs it and the law passes. If he doesn't, then the law isn't passed. What keeps this process going is the elected officials are the ones doing the work on this assembly line. They love working on the line because its power, and power is beyond awesome. If they don't do what you want, if they don't act on your behalf, then they will lose their power when the next election year comes around.
This is precisely why we need to that assembly line to be involved with airline security. The people who are elected and who have a lot to lose need to be in charge of these planes. Then the milk, raspberry tea, shaving cream, and hair gel can come back on the plane and passengers can feel safe knowing that there absolutely is an actual police force on the plane just in case of a hijacking. I wish more people thought like me. I'm a motherfucking trail blazer.












27 Comments:
ridiculous*
Given the tens of thousands of words I've written on this website, I'm allowed to have a typo occasionally you simple minded prick.
I like how your stupid simple brain couldn't think of anything other than a typo correction when commenting on my post. Blow me and have a nice day.
Seriously, you could at least contribute your opinion along with the typo correction. Without it, you just look like a prick, which you are. I felt the need to clarify.
Why don't you just say "NUH UH YOU ARE!" Because that's quite literally what you just said to me, just in more words.
I am defensive when faced with rudeness. If you wanted to be polite, you'd email me or message me on AIM with a little "psst, you made a typo FYI." You wouldn't leave it as a comment. So yes, I am very defensive when faced with rudeness from anyone, not to mention someone who is commenting anonymously on my website.
Secondly, I am very very far from simple minded. If I was simple minded, I probably would have replied with a "Fuck you" or I just would have fixed the typo. Instead, I berate you and laugh about it. I create entertainment for myself and my readers.
And just so you know, the only opinion that's important to me is my own. That's the one I concentrate and focus on and the one that I present on this website. Anonymous opinions mean absolutely nothing to me because well, they're anonymous. Faceless.
So again, blow me and have a nice day. Don't be a rude douche bag.
Do you know the definition of the word 'literally'? It means word for word, in this context. A more suitable wording of your 'well thought out' sentence would have been, "Because that's effectively what you just said to me".
Do you find it humilating that I corrected a common mistake in your article? I think you do.
"I create entertainment for myself and my readers"
I can't argue with that. Just that sentence alone made me laugh. Your 'readers'. What? All 5 of them?
I would keep going, but you're clearly some sort of meglomaniac who's too much of a moron to acknowledge that I'm right.
Kthnxbaibaimattkisskiss
Now you're going to try to take the pseudo-intellectual road. Let me tell you something, douche bag. You're an ignorant cunt who needs to be smashed in the face with a brick.
First off, let me correct you on the defintion of the word "literally." You see, if you're going to call me out on the meaning, it would be best to check a dictionary before making a complete fucking ass of yourself, you stupid little shit.
In a literal manner or sense; exactly : the driver took it literally when asked to go straight across the traffic circle | tiramisu, literally translated “pick me up.”
informal: used for emphasis or to express strong feeling while not being literally true : I have received literally thousands of letters.
That's Oxford, bitch. Meaning there are two definitions, a literal definition and an informal definition. So you're dead to rights there.
Secondly, I believe humility is a good thing. I believe it's great for people to see the humanity of in humility. So in no way could I be humiliated by what you said, and what I also believe is a common spelling mistake. The rudeness was a problem. The disrespect is a problem and as you've probably figured out by now, I'm not the type of person who responds well to disrespect.
What makes you think I have only 5 readers? Nigga please. I wouldn't be the "meglomaniac" that you accuse me of if I didn't have at least something to base it off of.
In June, I had 10,723 hits. In May I had 10,165. Then I started posting once or twice a month and my monthly hits went from 6,592 a in July to 4,429. I am now posting regularly again and I've already got 600 hits in 4 days, and this is coming off a posting drought. I'm doing fine with visits and readers. In March, when I had more more time to write, I had over 18,000 hits on the site and I'm well on my way back to those numbers. Trust me, plenty of people are reading and enjoying the site and my commentary.
Oh and by the way... It's "megalomaniac," you bitch. Have a nice day.
You still used the word at the wrong time, jackass.
Chillout, Asshat the Dick, or whatever it is that you're calling yourself.
No, I didn't use the word at the wrong time. Stop commenting, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Especially don't comment on grammar or spelling. Do me a favor and stick to commenting on the article. You're not very good at arguing, so don't do that either.
Would you define that trendy little internet insult "asshat?" Are you accusing me of having a bunghole around my head? If so, why? You can call me The Sick or The Dick, either way is accurate in my eyes. Oh no! Don't call me a dick! Please no! My reputation!
Ok, let's clear this up.
The correction was a friendly nudge; there was no need for you to go off like you did. Still, I see you corrected it, so it wasn't all bad.
Peace.
Wow! Long way to go for a spelling misteak....
Matt,
My guess is that most passengers would agree to pay an extra $5.00/ticket if we could have those 4 air marshals.
Matt, you will be in my prayers. Pax vobiscum.
sorry, can't agree with this article. I still maintain that airport security is not as big an issue as people make it out to be. We've had one successful attack in over 5 years, and haven't had one yet (foiled one in England). Our security is doing nothing extra since 9/11, no matter what they want you to believe. Searching old ladies isn't helping, and repeatedly people have snuck box-cutters onto airplanes as an example. But we still haven't had an attack since. 9/11 was tragic, sure, but it wasn't that big. More people died in cars that year than in the towers. Yet we spend billions of dollars on airport security that in reality does nothing but instill a fear in people and give them the impression that they need protecting. Who does the protecting? Why your friendly neighborhood government of course. By the way we'll need some of your rights in the name of security. I thought you of all people would be able to see through the bullshit that's going on now, yet you're calling for more security and government regulations of airlines? If people don't feel safe on airliners, they won't fly and the airlines will lose money. More government regulation is NOT the answer.
Zach
Anonymous:
Friendly or not, I still believe it to be rude, regardless of your intentions.
Ken:
Yeah, but I take great pleasure in arguing with people. With my idea, the passengers wouldn't need to pay any price increase. The burden would fall directly on the tax payers, which wouldn't be very much considering all of the other bullshit that we pay for.
Zach:
Well Zach, I understand your opinion, but you're a little bit misguided. Your head is in the right place, but you're just off on this and I will explain why.
Richard Reid was only barely caught trying to detonate his shoe. If he wasn't such a douche bag, he would have succeeded. These people are very clever. They always find holes. This post isn't about terrorism, Zach. We will never be safe from angry Arabs. That's a fact.
This post is about airline security. This post is about being able to get on a fucking plane, and being very confident that the plane will not be hijacked while being able to actually, you know, travel with at least 25% of your belongings.
The list of items you can no longer bring on a plane is obscene and its insulting to freedom at this point. Of course searching old ladies is pointless and of course, racially profiling is necessary.
If you notice, I'm not concerned with airport security. We don't even need an increase in airport security. The security is needed on the plane, where the people are. Let a bomb get on board in the luggage. Who the fuck is going to detonate it when you have uniformed security on the plane? When you have trained and uniformed security whose boss is an elected official, you will be a billion times safer than you are now.
I don't see any rights being violated in the name of security. I haven't had any of my rights violated by the federal government. The only time I ever really see rights being violated in this country is when cops are doing the violating. City and local authorities are the ones you need to watch if you're worried about rights.
I'm not calling for more security. I'm not calling for government regulations. I'm calling for an official creation of United States Air Marshes, who are technically federal police, whose sole duty is to patrol every flight going in or out of the United States. We have an FBI, CIA, Secret Service, Homeland Security Officers, and standard United States Marshals. Creating a law enforcement group for Airplanes is long overdue. We have cops that strictly patrol highways, we not airlines?
I'm not calling for regulation, Zach. You have it completely wrong. I'm tired of the fucking Airlines regulating what you can and can't have on an airplane. I'm tired of all of the regulation and lack of freedom to travel with your fucking belongings.
My solution will create freedom and make the regulation that you're against go away. So the bottom line is that you agree with me.
Why not airlines?* That's for the anonymous typo catching douche face.
To Matt:
Yes I agree with you. In principle. I don't agree with you about what we have to do to accomplish that. Responses below.
"This post is about airline security. This post is about being able to get on a fucking plane, and being very confident that the plane will not be hijacked while being able to actually, you know, travel with at least 25% of your belongings."
You know, that reminds me of a cartoon someone sent me recently. It was of the perfectly safe airline, and everyone was naked, standing in a little area. The point basically is, and I think you agree here, that there are those who wish to do harm, and that they will do harm unless we are willing to make insane measures to stop them. I flew a lot before 9/11. I carried on bags, and I knew everyone else was carrying on bags. My bag had normal stuff, like books, music, food, etc. I wasn't scared to death that someone had a bomb. Let's face it, the searches are imperfect, and they always will be. But that's life. Fortunately, there are way more good people than bad people. Of course there's a risk that someone will have a bomb, but there's also the chance when you drive the person behind you will be drunk and crash and kill you. There is always some risk, and to be perfectly frank, I didn't even think about the fact that someone would have a bomb, because statistically, that risk is less than the risk of crashing in a car.
What 9/11 did is instill fear in people. All these extra security measures are doing nothing but scare people. You know that as well as I do. I don't think Marshals on the planes would be any different. I'm not sure how old you are exactly, but I'm pretty sure you're young enough to remember high school. Did you have policemen with guns walking in the school? Did it make you feel safe? We do, and it sure doesn't make me feel safe. Now imagine going to class, and having multiple people with guns just standing back there and watching the students to make sure they don't do anything funny. Are you scared yet?
Now imagine you own your own business. You want to sell stuff, and to do that you need customers. But the federal government insists on putting Marshals in your store to stop burglary. You don't want it because you use logic like it's uncommon, but the government knows better than you and does it anyway. Sales go down and you go out of business. Is that fair? I'll go into more detail later.
"The list of items you can no longer bring on a plane is obscene and its insulting to freedom at this point. Of course searching old ladies is pointless and of course, racially profiling is necessary. "
Agree with the racial profiling, and profiling more than just race as well though. There is a difference here though. The list of items should be based on the airline. In my opinion if a plane wants to allow passengers to carry guns on board, they should be able to do that. They wouldn't get any business and would hopefully go out of business. The problem is that people are now scared enough (more so by the extra "security" than the actual attack) that they think this is all for their own good and go along with it.
"If you notice, I'm not concerned with airport security. We don't even need an increase in airport security. The security is needed on the plane, where the people are. Let a bomb get on board in the luggage. Who the fuck is going to detonate it when you have uniformed security on the plane? When you have trained and uniformed security whose boss is an elected official, you will be a billion times safer than you are now."
Same can be said of cars. Let's assign an armed policeman to every car. They can make sure they drive safely. That wouldn't only save the person driving, but innocent bystanders as well. Win-win situation right? Oh you actually care about liberty? Oh well I guess it works now.
"I don't see any rights being violated in the name of security. I haven't had any of my rights violated by the federal government. The only time I ever really see rights being violated in this country is when cops are doing the violating. City and local authorities are the ones you need to watch if you're worried about rights."
I would like to see more details here. The good part about the local governments is that they are much easier to change. But what rights do you see violated by local governments? Cops are a different story. As long as the cops that do illegal stuff are fired, that's all the city/county/whatever can really do.
"I'm not calling for more security. I'm not calling for government regulations. I'm calling for an official creation of United States Air Marshes, who are technically federal police, whose sole duty is to patrol every flight going in or out of the United States. We have an FBI, CIA, Secret Service, Homeland Security Officers, and standard United States Marshals. Creating a law enforcement group for Airplanes is long overdue. We have cops that strictly patrol highways, we not airlines?"
I beg to differ. You are calling for more security. What do you think the marshals would be? By the way, you have read the Constitution right? Where does the government have the power to put armed Marshals on the planes of private businesses? What's to stop them from doing the same thing in the store scenario above?
"I'm not calling for regulation, Zach. You have it completely wrong. I'm tired of the fucking Airlines regulating what you can and can't have on an airplane. I'm tired of all of the regulation and lack of freedom to travel with your fucking belongings. "
I agree. I think the airlines should do the regulating. ALL of it. But you are calling for regulation. You're just picking and choosing which regulations you like and which you don't. I'm sorry, but I don't see how you can think that FORCING airlines to allow armed Marshals on the plane is not regulation. Call it necessary regulation if you want, but it's not regulation.
Basically I think every increase in "security" has done nothing. It has only made the people more afraid and more willing to give up rights. The only group benefiting is the federal government, who now has almost infinite power (well finally the Supreme Court recognized that they don't, but that was long overdue). I think the marshal would almost turn into a simple intimidation. I'm not sure about the stats, do you have stats for how often planes are bombed or hijacked? My guess is very very low. In fact I would be willing to bet that more planes crash than are bombed. But just a guess. Although I understand that it is not your intent, what you are proposing would be the next step in this slippery slope of government intrusion upon private businesses and our lives, in the name of safety. People would be reminded every flight that at any moment they can be blown up. Of course then they will be perfectly willing to let the government perform warrantless wiretaps, arrest people without a cause, and many other things that Bush will argue is "imperative to the war on terror". He's full of shit as is the rest of this.
On September 11, 2001, I still remember hearing about the attacks. I was like "holy shit, what's going on here?". It was a big deal. Many people died. But look back at it. In the scheme of things it was an attack. It killed some people, but it didn't kill that many. People die, it's a fact of life. Without death, life wouldn't be worth living. Of course I'm not arguing against security, WHEN it is necessary. I don't think it is. One attack almost 5 years ago has changed our whole perception about airplane travel. The fact that we CAUGHT people PLANNING to hijack planes is enough to ban liquids. We caught them. We have pretty damn good security. Obviously we're not perfect. But you know what, we never will be. There's always the risk that someone on the street will pull out a gun and shoot me. If we ban guns, it won't matter, it will be a knife. It's always something. People who want to will always find ways to do harm. The fact that we have gone all crazy and afraid of an attack, because of ONE attack 5 years ago, is quite simply rediculous. It would be like all Hawaians being terrified of another Pearl Harbor. Sure it could happen, but it's pretty unlikely. Be worried about slipping in the shower and dying. Be worried about crashing your car. Be worried about cancer, a heart attack, whatever. Those are all infinitely more likely than another terror attack (on your given flight, just like we were talking about the diseases on your given body). We've always had good security, because we've always known about the threat. Now all of a sudden we have to go crazy just because other people are? I see no need for Marshals on planes, and I see plenty of opportunites to just plain intimidate passengers into submission, and also plenty of Constitutional violations. Other than that, I completely agree with you.
Zach
start of new days
has nothing changed
the sick knows no pain
the sick knows no pain
matt had sex with a donkey and a giraffe
At the same time. And I fucking loved every second of it. That long black tongue can do some extremely amazing stuff.
"I haven't posted in a month, and for that I sincerely apologize. I've seen a lot of good internet writers pull this move, and I know how inconsiderate and douche baggy it is. So I promise to refrain from the whole absentee blogger thing."
WHAT'S UP???
School, PJ. I have about 30 minutes of free time per week day. If I'm lucky.
I guess that's a good enough excuse. How's school going?
Great man. I just literally have no time. Like right now, this is escape from my girlfriend time. I'm gonna launch something new here over the weekend.
Don't worry, it's understandable that you have a life besides blogging :)
But at the same time, I really like reading your writing. Hopefully you'll post something soon. Thanks.
Zach
Thanks, Zach. I appreciate it. I'll do something over the weekend. I'll be less busier in the next month.
You gotta have something to say about that Baptist group who goes around picketing at the funerals of the lost soldiers'. They were going to go to the funerals of the dead amish girls and say that "the angry hand of God" did this to them, and that "they deserved it." Instead some guy said he would give them some air time on t.v. to shut her up, and she said o.k. I saw her on H&C last night. They both ripped her pretty well.
Yeah dude, that story is fucked up. The person who offered him air time is a radio host on Sirius named Bubba The Love Sponge. I'll be a lot less busier soon so I can talk about this sort of stuff.
And yes, I have a lot to say about those fucking GodHatesFags people. They're probably the only people on the face of the earth who could absolutely cause me to break the law. Not kidding.
I agree Matt, I cant keep from blogging about them. And in return I get a deluge of Christian hate mail which confuses the hell out of me.
On a side note I saw on Dalyces myspace page that she is really showing. Are you getting excited? Dumb question huh?
Im happy for you guys. Rock on my friend.
Post a Comment
<< Home