August 31, 2005

Katrina

Hurricane Katrina, while definitely a very newsworthy event, isn't quite something for a blogger of my style to talk about. I like bitching about things, and there's really no one to blame for it. I'm not the typical news commentary sort of blogger. I hunt and pick for things I'm passionate about and I talk about them. I'll try my best though.

This chaos is enormous. A scenario like this was beyond imaginable in the US. Seeing a massively flooded city, with giant buildings in the far distance is just an amazing sight. The tsunami images did nothing for me compared to this. It's sort of like the difference between accidently dropped a glass plate on the ground opposed to dropping fine antique china on the ground. Seeing a famous city like this under water like Atlantis is just stunning.

It's cool because normally when you're driving past something shocking on the highway, you have to keep going and you can only look for a second. But here, we have this massive accident and we can watch it 24/7 and enjoy the entertainment of this chaos. It's ok, you can admit to enjoying it. I know you people were entertained when Jeanne, Francis, and Charlie slammed into me last year. Yes, I got not one, but three delightful hurricanes. And I know everyone else, including those people in New Orleans were watching the coverage on TV and enjoying it as entertainment. I just figure it's my turn. So let's review some of the chaos that's going on.

  • Black people are looting everything they can get their hands on. (I've yet to see any white or brown people looting on CNN or FOX)
  • A Police Officer in New Orleans was shot in the head by a looter
  • People fired on a police station with an automatic weapon
  • Cnn says "hundreds" of people are looting
  • They're going to evacuate the Super Dome, which has no power, holes in the roof, and no longer holds the capability of handling human waste
  • Attempted car jackings are extremely frequent
  • The National Guard is already in New Orelans, and troops are being called up from the reserve, not just to rescue, but to also uphold the law
  • Martial Law will be declared by the Mayor tomorrow. Martial law hasn't been seen in the US since WWII
  • Floating bodies are being pushed aside by rescue workers while on their way to help the Darwin-doomed (I made that up)
  • Someone killed themselves at the Super Dome, jumping from the second level
  • Two major hospitals have been completely evacuated
  • A children's hostpital is under seige by a group of looters
  • The flooding will not stop until everything is 3 feet above sea level
  • Three separate sections of the levees are broken
  • They don't bury the dead in New Orleans. It's illegal. If you die in that city and you want to be buried there, you're in a mausoleum which means if your site happens to get flooded, your remains will be floating around
  • Interstate 10, the major highway that leads in and out of New Orleans is destroyed. Chunks are missing, and for large distances chunks of the highway are dislodged (This was the most disturbing thing I've seen so far, look at it here)
  • Oh, and gas prices rose 30 fucking cents on a 2 dollar oil price gain

    Isn't all of that fucking lovely? I can't wait for the National Guard to come in and start shooting these stupid motherfuckers. I don't care if they need the food to survive. If they planned on being a stupid fuck in the first place and staying there when a category 5 hurricane was about to slam directly into their home, which is completely surrounded by water and is sitting 10 feet below sea level, then they should have went out and bought the fucking food in the first place. These people, most of them, aren't looting to survive. They're looting because they can. The pharmacy as a Winn-Dixie was cleaned out. I'm sure people just needed their medication, right?

    These fucking looters make me sick. Because we have two levels of stupid fuck here. First, they're stupid fucks for not leaving. Now, while you're a stupid fuck for not getting out of there, I can at least understand and see why people might stay. A lot of these people have ridden out the big ones before, and saw this one the same way. That's at least somewhat understandable. The people who made the at least educated choice to stay went and stocked up on supplies because they at least knew this, to a certain degree, would happen.

    I also just heard a report of a local Wal-Mart letting people come in and take what they need. I assume they're allowing them to take food, not electonics and what not. That's really great. Wal-Mart even donated a million bucks. I love Wal-Mart. Doesn't that just make you feel all warm and fuzzy to see acts like that come from a place you'd expect nothing but corporate greed?

    These fucking people I see on tv, the Darwin-doomed, I am pissed that I see National Guard resources being used on them. These people are going into the streets and stealing anything they can. Reports can't even go in there anymore to show us what's going on because they're going to get robbed or mugged. It makes me sick so see such lawlessness. Why didn't people get up and go? At the least, why didn't they go to the Super Dome? Because they're fucking stupid, that's why. Watch this video of the looting. All black people, stealing beer, shoes, and clothing. Look at the smile on all of their faces. Look how much fun they're having. Survival? I fucking think not.

    You're not seeing average Joe Smith walking around saying "Do you know where I can get food?" No, you're see the scum of the earth throwing everything they can into garbage cans at the local Winn-Dixie. People walking down the streets with TVs. I hope these people are shot and killed with automatic weapons tomorrow, instead of being saved from their roof tops. Why can't they just let the strong and smart survive?

    And President Bush... Don't you think that today maybe wasn't the best day for a photo op of you jamming out with a presidential acoustic guitar, with that big shit-eating grin on your face? Bad decision, Sir. The left will have a field day with this. And even people who generally support you, or at the least, don't think you're an imperialist tyrant will look down on you and frown upon this poor decision. I would have liked to see the President on TV giving a press conference, or at least giving one of those little "live talks to the nation" things instead of that abomination up there. Bad, bad decision.

    Update: I saw a white looter on TV! She had no teeth. She was walking out of a Blockbuster I believe. Lots of survival necessities in there I'm sure. They sell candy and popcorn. Regardless, they shouldn't even be in a position where they need to steal to survive in the first place. I really can't wait for the sun to come up so I can see people get shot. I might stay up all day and not sleep so I can witness this. If looters aren't shot, I will be pissed.

    Update 2: Those video links aren't working because they contain javascript that works with code on the CNN pages. You'll have to goto their site to see them. Whomp whomp.

  • August 29, 2005

    A Picture Share!

    Im at Raw live in Tampa. Watch Spike tv at 9. Im there.

    August 28, 2005

    Sheeman Communicates With Dead

    Cindy Sheehan, or simply Sheeman as I like to call her, apparently has divine connections. She is now speaking for her son in the "afterlife" and is using that apparent communication to further push her insane bile.

    "When I get up [to heaven], he's gonna say, 'Good job, mom,'" the California woman said in a speech last night upon her return to Crawford, Texas. "He's not going to say, 'Why'd you make me spin in my grave?' you know. And I can just hear him saying, 'George Bush, you are really an idiot. You didn't know what you were doing when you killed me. You didn't know what you were getting into.'"

    That's right. Apparently Casey Sheehan is telling his insane mother that George Bush is an idiot, and he didn't know what he was getting into when he killed him. I guess she's referring to what she believes is a massive and successful protest down in Crawford. I wonder if she's ever seen the protests from the Vietnam era, when 50,000 people would join together to protest. But hey, she can relish in her delusions of grandeur all she wants because it provides me with such a great opportunity to mock.

    This woman is just so fucking wrong. It's actually disturbing at this point. She really has no shame at all. It's so hard for me to put myself into this extreme leftist mindset, making it difficult to really understand what this is all about. I have a theory about these people, the far left as a whole.

    You see, even when Clinton was in office, there was a "far left." This is my theory though. I believe every far left individual either had an extremely abusive mother or father, thus creating an absolute anti-establishment personality. It doesn't matter who's in charge. If you're in charge, you're Daddy and you're an evil assholes. The arguments come later. Oil, men and women dying in wars, lies, political corruption, they're all fake points used to justify this permanent anti-establishment mindset.

    And when I say this, I'm speaking of extreme liberals. Not democrats or progressives necessarily. I'm talking about the leaders of all these far left groups like Code Pink, Gold Star Families, Moveon.org, Michael Moore, Sheeman, every host on Air America excluding Jerry Springer. These people just don't think rationally at all. They're absolutely blind to pure logic and reason. All because they subconsciously hate whoever is in charge, because that's Daddy. Just a theory. Moving on to the rest of Sheeman's insanity now.

    "I know that they are in heaven," Sheehan said, "and I know that that's why this movement is growing because we have tens of thousands of angels behind us that are supporting us, that are saying, 'Well, you know we died and that was really crappy, but we hope that our deaths are going to make the world a better place,' and it's up to us to make sure that it does."

    Absolutely fucking nuts. Who is she to say that every soldier who died in Iraq is in Heaven? Who is she to know that every soldier who died was a person worthy of going to Heaven? Does she personally know all 1,870 killed soldiers? I'll tell you this, I'm in the middle of busting an online sexual predator who just returned from Iraq. I bet when he dies, he isn't going to Heaven. But I'm just putting myself into your realm of logic. I don't believe anyone is going anywhere but in the ground. Just needed to point that out. But that's not important.

    She also goes even further down the disturbing road of insanity. She claims that her little protest has tens of thousands of angels behind it. That's right. Apparently, there's over 10,000 angels also supporting her cause. Angel Anthony, can you confirm or deny this for me, please?

    It's just so fucking horrible that this woman is speaking for "tens of thousands" of angels, who I guess she is claiming are both soldiers, terrorists, and civilians in Iraq. She's speaking for them, literally saying they are talking to her, and using that to push her absolute hate for George Bush. This fucking troll of a woman has no shame whatsoever.

    Sheehan has referred to her son as an angel, stating in an Aug. 5 speech, Casey "became an angel while I was sleeping."

    Once again, Angel Anthony, I'm going to need a confirmation or denial on this. I trust you will have the answers. Could you also point out how she may have come to find this out? Is she being visited in her dreams like Joseph was?

    Ah who cares. That part isn't that important. She just keeps getting more and more fucked up in this article. Next, she decides it's a good idea to actually justify the death of her son. Yes, justify.

    "Casey was killed by insurgents. He wasn't killed by terrorists," she said. "He was killed by Shiite militia who wanted him out of the country, when Casey was told he was going to be welcomed with chocolate and flowers as a liberator. Well, the people of Iraq saw it differently. They saw him as an occupier."

    Honestly, how much longer will this fucking horrible woman continue to defile her son's death? I'm really surprised that everyone isn't in agreement that this woman is insane at this point. She's justifying the people who killed her son. Now, I'm going to go out on a limb here. But if I had to guess, I would say that out of that 1,870 men and women who have died in Iraq... Maybe 2 or 4 tops actually would publiclly say that their son or daughter being murdered by extremist Muslims was understandable and justifiable. This fucking woman makes me sick.

    Sheeman just doesn't have the brain capacity to understand this. Paul Revere was an insurgent. Paul Revere did what he did because of his country. An insurgency is a revolt against a country. This isn't an insurgency. Maybe some of these guys are true "insurgents", but the Shiite Muslims who launched an RPG at her son were not "insurgents." These were terrorists, connected to Al Qaeda. They're doing this because of their religion, and their fucking whacked out belief that the infidels are invading their land.

    We're fighting primitive animals. Where do you think they got that rocket launcher from? She doesn't use her fucking head. Oh, and a "Shiite militia" did not kill your fucking son. Shiite terrorists killed your son. Muslim extremists killed your son, because they believe he is an infidel invading his land. If there were WMDs, hell if there was a fucking ready-to-launch nuke found in Iraq, he still would have been killed. They're attacking us because they see us as infidels invading their Muslim nation. Blame the Quran, not Bush, you miserable cunt.

    "That doesn't bother me at all, but what bothers me so much is when they say I am dishonoring my son's memory by what I'm doing, that my son would be ashamed of me or what they really like to say is that I'm pissing, or shitting, or spitting on his grave."

    The reason it bothers you the most because deep down, you know that's exactly what you're doing. And I'm very glad to see you finally coming to terms with this fact. You are pissing, you are shitting, and you are spitting on his grave. You are setting his honor on fire for politics. And I hope knowing that drives you to throw yourself in front of a fucking bus.

    Update: If you want to see what's really going on in Crawford, then all you have to do is watch this 15 minute video that documents the trip to Crawford and the first day. It shows, without any media bias, what it's all about. You see the truth. You'll never see this video on Fox, though. You'll never hear her talk about how pissed she is that her son got a military funeral. You'll never hear her talk about how her son is not a hero, and how she doesn't want anyone, specifically children, believing her son is a hero. That's all I have to say about this complete piece of shit. I really hope someone gets pissed and runs her over with a monster truck. Or something to that nature.

    August 26, 2005

    The Leader of Our Enemies

    I will talk about this only because it gives you an even deeper insight into the psyche of our enemies. The people that struck us on 9/11, the people we're fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, the people who behead civilian US workers in Iraq, including burning their bodies and hanging them from a bridge. Where does it all come from? Why do they do this? What does it all mean, Basil? Islam.

    Islam is the key to it all. I don't care what anyone says because I read the Quran and I know. They can call it a religion of peace all they want, but when it comes down to it, the source of the problem is Islam. This is my position, and it's the truth. I know we were taught in school that prejudice is bad. I know we were taught that judging an entire group of people based on one factor is wrong. This isn't what I'm doing.

    I judge the religion of Islam and I do not judge the Muslim, but only their ability and risk to be easily turned into an extremist based on the absolutely vicious teachings of the Quran. Let's get down to it.

    Over at ArabNews.com, a very interesting article has been posted. The headline: Punishing Disobedient Wives... You know what's coming, don't you?

    Now when I saw the headline, I was expecting some uppity Muslim douche bag to defend the atrocious words of the Quran, and to try and explain that you're not supposed to actually beat your wife. Wrong. The article is actually pro wife-beater. The writer comes out against people who don't interpret a certain passage properly. He basically says you're actually supposed to beat your wife, which the Quran says to do in plain terms, and not throw her out of the house which is what moderate Muslims do apparently. On to the article.

    I find it unacceptable when some people twist the meaning of a particular verse in the Holy Qur’an — especially the one which permits a husband to beat his disobedient wife.

    Children are disobedient. Cats are disobedient. Dogs are disobedient. Women are not disobedient. Women bitch, and that's that. In America, it is considered extremely wrong to beat children, cats, dogs, or women. Even if they are moody and never seem to be happy. It's just the way it is. We still love them, despite their sometimes insane logic. We do not beat them because of it. Not beating your disobedient wife is an unheard of concept to this man though.

    The verse — number 34 in Surah IV — reads as follows: “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women because Allah has given them one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore, righteous women are devotedly obedient and guard in (the husband’s) absence what Allah would have them guard. And to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first) and (then) refuse to share their beds (and last) beat them (lightly), but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means of annoyance.”

    Beyond fucking sick. First of all, I love how this asshole adds in his own paraphrasing. He adds "lightly" after the commandment of beating your disobedient wife. Who is he to decide that Allah meant lightly or harshly? He's no one. He only added that "lightly" in there so his argument wasn't 110% fucked, opposed to 100% fucked. Regardless, the Quran very simply states to first yell at them nicely, then stop fucking them, and if they continue to disobey, then beat them. It doesn't say lightly beat them. It just says beat them. Do you people realize that this is the word of their God, and this is the mindset of Muslims? They don't pick and choose what to obey and disobey of their God's words. Unlike Christians, they actually live and die by their book. I'm speaking of the average Muslim versus the average Christian.

    The beating which is only prescribed in the case of disobedient wives is intended to serve as a remedy in an unusual situation. If the husband feels the wife is behaving in a disobedient and rebellious manner, he is required to rectify her attitude — first by kind words, then gentle persuasion and reasoning. Beating as a last resort must never be understood to entail using a stick or any other instrument that would cause pain or injury.

    No. Beating your wife is not a remedy for an unusual situation. Divorce or separation is the remedy. Isn't that a strange concept for the Muslims? You don't actually own your wife. Despite popular belief, every innocent person, or at least close to innocent person is a free person. No woman is ever owned by any man. But this is considered normal in Islam. This isn't just the case in the middle east. This is also the case of those kind Muslims you see running your local gas station. But hey, at least he denounces the use of sticks or instruments. He says not to use them because they would inflict pain or injury. But... It's OK to use your hand. Because that doesn't inflict pain or injury? What the fuck is this man talking about. Do you see the double-talk? He wants to defend his religion without exposing its viciousness because he too knows the truth and defends it anyway.

    A rebellious woman who is not moved by kind words, persuasion and admonition is a woman of no feeling and must therefore be punished by beating. Psychiatrists tell us of people, including women, for whom a cure lies in beating.

    What? Let me inform this asshole, along with every other sadistic Muslim of a sad, but true fact of life. Women very rarely respond to kind words, gentle persuasion, or denial of sex when faced with an "unusual situation." You ladies who read my site know this to be true, and you guys who read my site know this to be true. We love women and women love men, but there are just simple facts of life. Women complain a lot because men are assholes. It's just the way it is. All I guy can do is try to be less of an asshole while a girl tries not to complain as much. That's just a fact of life. Not in the Muslim world, though. A man is never an asshole. A man is superior and if a women should ever disobey him, she shall be beaten.

    And then this little fuck has the nerve to bring psychiatry into play. He actually makes the absurd claim that psychiatrists say that women are cured by beatings. Maybe in your fucking fanatical, primitive, and unevolved middle eastern shithole "psychiatrists" will claim women respond to beatings. Sure they do. They respond by curling up and dying inside. But why would these lovely Muslim men care if that happened? Their women are only there to satisfy their animalistic need to fuck, and nothing more.

    The controversy over the beating of disloyal and rebellious women is part of the campaign against Islam. If beating disobedient wives was advocated by Western scientists, it would have been widely supported by the same people who criticize Islam and special centers would have been set up all over the world to train husbands on how to beat their wives.

    Hah. He tries to make a point. Here, his hate for the west and his love for an insane ideology emerges. He claims that if Americans advocated the beating of "rebellious" women, then we would set up special centers to train husbands how to beat their wives. This is just so fucking stupid. I don't even know what he's trying to say. The west supports good ideas, and tries to make sure everyone can perform them well? I don't know, maybe. Regardless, it's fucking stupid. He shows his true colors.

    This is just a glimpse into the mindset of Muslims. This is normal behavior. This is OK. This is what you do. They actually beat the shit out of their wives about as often as a man might say "Will you please leave me the fuck alone." This is a normal occurrence. It's just the way things are in the Arab world. You beat the shit out of your wife when she's rebellious. When you do this, you're looked upon by your peers as normal and religious.

    This is our enemy. This is just a glimpse into the way they think and see the world. This is normal. I cannot stress this enough. When something like this is deemed normal, and commanded by their holy book, is it so hard to understand why they might want to kill infidels? Infidels, being those who don't believe in their God. Is it so hard, just be reading that small passage, as to why they hate America? It's because their beliefs are considered radical, and their holy book is the only truth to them. Wake up, we're not fighting a war on terror. We're fighting a war on an ideology really. A feeling of hate caused by the teaching of the Quran. And it's that feeling of hate that drives a husband and father to fly an airplane into a building, committing the most honorable act he can imagine.

    When you're fighting a war, you must identify the leader of the enemy. Osama Bin Laden leads Al Qaeda. Saddam Hussain lead his Baathist regime. The Taliban lead their forces along with Al Qaeda. But here's the truth that needs to be recognized if we're ever going to get out of this mess: Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussain, and the Taliban regime were all lead by one person. Allah. And Allah only exists in one form, and that is the Quran.

    The Quran is the leader of the war on terror. It may not create an American hating extremist who's willing to kill for their cause out of every follower. What I am certain of is that it does create the possibility of an extremist who's willing to kill for their cause. Maybe 1-3% only become extremists. But out of a billion believers, this is an absolutely massive amount. It's an unorganized Army. And even the non-extreme Muslim has that seed in them, placed by the Quran to become an extremist who will kill.

    Can we end Islam? No. Can we end the Quran? No. Can we kill Allah? No. The fact of the matter is, we're fighting a war on terror, and that's just an war that can't be won. You can't fight a religion. Hitler tried, and he's now deemed the most evil man of all time. It's something we could never do. Nor would I even want to see that happen. The only way is to reform the Quran and every Cleric who preaches it. But in the end, that can only achieve limited results.

    My conclusion? We're fucked. We are fucked because logically, you cannot fight a belief. You cannot change 1-3% of a billion peoples' idea that we should all die. You can only sustain them, and deal with them the best we can. No more wars. Afghanistan was an absolutely essential war. Iraq would have been had the intelligence not been incorrect. I fully support the continuation of both wars. I truly hope that we are making a huge difference in the security of the United States by fighting these wars. There have been no attacks since 9/11, so that's a sign we're doing something right and that our men and women in Iraq and Afghanistan are keeping us safe. I think the focus should be on homeland security rather than fighting wars, though. I do think fighting the wars is essential, but above that should be homeland security. In the end, I think that will foil more plots than fighting the wars will. The military is the 1st line of defense and our intelligence community along with the FBI and every law enforcement agency in every county in the US are the last defense. And in the end, this is what matters. We don't want to get killed while we're out and about living our lives. And it's a fucking shame that we have to have that slight fear and that constant reminder of 9/11 in the back of our heads because of the attacks on 9/11 because of that fucking Quran. But remember, and this is my main point. The Quran is the leader of leaders of our enemy.

    August 25, 2005

    I Hate Cindy Sheehan

    There are only three things that would make me leave: if George comes out and talks to me; if August comes to an end, or if I am arrested.*

    Haw Haw. I think not. There's always an exception, and there's always an asterisk with these fucking people. Her Mom had a stroke, and she bailed. She's very inconsistent though. She says she might not be back, then she says she could be back in a couple days. She has no clue. She bailed.

    This was last week. Now, after a brief vacation, Sheeman is back. (You read that nickname here first) I've been keeping tabs on her blog since she's been gone, and I haven't really felt the need to talk about her at all. She left, and I expected her to fade into obscurity. I wish I was right.

    She's now announcing that she's coming back to Crawford. Even though the President isn't there... But hey, it's her prerogative. And it's my prerogative to bitch about it. Let's start off by catching up on some of her most severely asinine statements from the past week, including some extremely colorful language that Drudge dug up.

    "They’re a bunch of fucking hypocrites! And we need to, we just need to rise up..." Sheehan said of the Bush administration. "If George Bush believes his rhetoric and his bullshit, that this is a war for freedom and democracy, that he is spreading freedom and democracy, does he think every person he kills makes Iraq more free?"

    "The whole world is damaged. Our humanity is damaged. If he thinks that it’s so important for Iraq to have a U.S.-imposed sense of freedom and democracy, then he needs to sign up his two little party-animal girls. They need to go to this war."

    "We want our country back and, if we have to impeach everybody from George Bush down to the person who picks up dog shit in Washington, we will impeach all those people."

    Oh! What a lovely mouth on this whore. It's almost as bad as mine. But I'm an angry blogger and she's a fucking 50 year old mother. She should clean up her language, especially when speaking in public. Also in the article, she calls Bush a terrorist. This woman is absolutely insane, and I believe she was insane before her son was killed. I actually heard a sound clip of this, and if you could only hear her tone. She's just so fucking irate. This woman is truly nuts, and I wish the media would wake up and realize that she's not a grieving anti-war mother. She's an insane far left liberal carefully using her son's death as a soap box to push her agenda and beliefs. Absolutely horrible. All you have to do is read to believe. It's a smoke screen.

    This woman is just so fucking crazy. And I really mean crazy. She barely has a grasp of reality, and I think someone who is close to her needs to point this out to her somehow. When you really dig in like I am and read every one of her words, it becomes clear that she's just insane... It's as simple as that. She's mad. But I can still make fun of her. There's just so much insanely stupid rhetoric, I don't know which to use.

    Bush is currently in Idaho and Sheeman felt the need to respond to everything Bush saying during a speech. It's really hilarious. Here are the good parts:

    "Bush said that two high-ranking members of his staff already met with her earlier this month and that he met with her last year." 'I didn't go to Crawford to meet with Steven "Yellow cake uranium liar" Hadley or the other "high-ranking" official they sent out. I went to meet with George. Does he get that yet? I did meet with him 10 weeks after his insane and arrogant Iraq war policies killed Casey and 9 weeks after I buried my oldest child. George: things are different between you and I now.'

    Just look at how this stupid whore talks. Look at her language. How does she possibly expect to meet with the President of the most powerful nation in the world when she talks like this. What if I, out of nowhere, started demanding to meet Sheeman? Think she'd meet me with the way I talk about her? Of course not. And when will this stupid bitch get it through her fucking big skull. Shiite Muslims killed her son, Casey. Not George Bush. And if she wants to use this retrograde logic, then she would have to put all of the blame on herself. By her own blame game logic, it was Bush who went to war, but it was Casey who volunteered and it was Sheeman who raised Casey. Obviously, something she did instilled a sense of patriotism. Maybe she knows that, and maybe she passing the buck to the 3rd tier, which is Bush. In all reality, Shiite Muslims who launched RPGs at your son are responsible. Even if there were WMDs in Iraq, Sheeman would still be bitching. She's a pissed off anti-war cunt. What can you do?

    "'The Sunnis have got to make a choice,' Bush said. 'Do they want to live in a society that's free? Or do they want to live in violence?'" 'Too bad George didn't give them that option before he invaded and occupied their country resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent people. I bet they would choose to live in a peaceful country free of foreign occupiers.'

    Here's something I do know about Iraq. 99% of Iraqis are very fucking happy that Saddam is gone. They are glad their country is free. When you break it down to that, it's all true. Some want us to leave. Some wish it wasn't us who did the freeing. Regardless, everyone in Iraq is glad to be free from Saddam's regime. But of course, this filthy whore doesn't think about that. She's fucking beyond ignorant.

    How does he honor the soldiers by killing more of their buddies? People say Casey is ashamed of me and I dishonor his memory! I knew my son better than anyone on earth and I know he is appalled by the continued carnage in his name. George: you can't win the war on terror by killing more of our soldiers and innocent Iraqi people. You are breeding more terror. And judging from the fact that you are now tied with the worst president in US history (Nixon) in your abysmal poll numbers, the people of our country realize this too and want you stopped.

    You dishonor every person fighting in Iraq with this bullshit. An extremely small minority of weasel kids using the military for college tuition who didn't expect to go to war might agree. Might. If I were in Iraq, I would hate you and wish for your death. You would be spitting on every ounce of agony I'd be feeling every day if I were over there. This fucking woman has no concept, and it makes me sick. And by the way, the worst President in history wasn't Nixon. It was Hoover, the President responsible for the great depression. Stupid whore.

    I'm coming back to Crawford for my son. As long as the president, who sent him to die in a senseless war, is in Crawford, that is where I belong. I came here two and a half weeks ago for one reason, to try and see the president and get an answer to a very simple question: What is the noble cause that he says my son died for? The answer to that question will not bring my son back. But it may stop more meaningless deaths. Because every death is now a meaningless one. And the vast majority of our country knows this.

    What an absolute piece of shit. If this cunt said this in my presence, I would slap her right in her stupid fucking face. I really would. I'd then turn to a nearby officer and willingly go to jail for it. I could care less. I'd slap a whore for making such an absolutely disgusting comment. How fucking dare she. How dare she say that every death in Iraq is meaningless. All to push her fucking agenda. She disgraces 1800+ men and women who have bravely went to war in Iraq with her far left bullshit. The stupid whore. I'm glad your mother had a stoke. She deserved it for giving birth to the evil demon that you are. And I'm glad your husband is divorcing you. I feel sorry for anyone who had to be saddled with an insane cunt like you for over 20 years.

    Now I attack her logic. How can the answer to one of your questions simply save "meaningless deaths?" Hmm? How is this physically possible. We're not discussing ancient Chinese philosophy here. We're discussing an insane far left liberal who clearly has no idea what reality is. She doesn't even know what she's saying at this point. She's just throwing words together and opening her mouth.

    I know Casey will be waiting for me when it is my turn, and I know when I finally get there he's going to hug me and say: "Good job, Mom."

    Actually, if Heaven really did exist, he would hug you and then kick you in your vagina for being such a rude bitch, and for using his name to push your fucking far left peace agenda. How much longer will you continue to absolutely drag your son's name through the mud? How much more will you disgrace him? That's the part that pisses me off the most about this, really. I could care less about Bush. I know we probably shouldn't have gone to Iraq in the first place. But in the end, a kid died. And he is the one who deserves all the respect and honor in the world. And it's a fucking shame that it's all being denied by his own mother. A meaningless death for Casey? I think not. Regardless of the direction, dying while fighting for your country is just about the most respectable death one could have. And Sheeman's too blind to get it.

    August 22, 2005

    Where Is The Rioting

    A gas station owner in Alabama was killed while trying to stop a gas thief.

    Husain Caddi was eyeing an SUV who was filling up their gas tank when they decided to take off. He thought it was a good idea to give chase and to grab onto some part of the vehicle. He would eventually fall off, and end up getting ran over by the SUV's back tire. He died.

    And I say fucking good. Greedy piece of shit. Was the $52 worth it tough guy? Maybe if oil didn't cost $65 a barrel, people wouldn't be driving off with unpaid gas as often. I wish the article stated what the prices were at that particular gas station. But that's ok.

    You see, with this whole gas price situation, there are many levels of greedy pieces of shit. It all trickles down to the dot-head/towel head who owns the gas station. Hey, don't get mad. It's true. They have dots on their forehead and they have turbals on their head. It's not racism. It's labelism.

    So, back to the levels of greed. It starts with the middle eastern governments that we are dependent on. Then it falls down to OPEC. I believe, in my opinion, that OPEC is the biggest thief in the chain. Then OPEC sells to the oil companies, and then they refine it and send it off to gas stations. Those individual gas stations order the gas the same way a supermarket orders any item on its shelf. Then they set their price. And that's the key.

    You see, there's a reason why gas will be 2.70 in one state, and then 2.40 in another. This is the degree of greed. Both of those gas stations are buying their gas at the same price. It's all a matter of adding mark-up. So in the end, for that extra mark-up, you can indeed put the blame on the individual store owners.

    And if all of the store owners would rally and do something about these prices, then maybe shit like this wouldn't happen. But why would that ever happen? Anyone who is connected to oil is getting filthy fucking rich. Goto any financial site and look at a 5 year stock chart for Unocal, Exxon Mobil, ChevronTexaco, etc. Anybody who owns a gas station is seeing absolutely massive record profits. But I thought they were only balancing supply and demand? I thought the price was only determined on the cost of oil at the wholesale level? Bullshit. Something funny is going on. Otherwise, every company that sells gas wouldn't be achieving record numbers. They should be at least close to consistent and steady profits. Not massive rapid growth, which is what any chart will show in at least the last 8 months. It's bullshit.

    And that's why people will drive off without paying. And I say good for you. I'm glad, and I'm happy it's happening. I hope people fucking riot. I hope people start burning down gas stations. I hope people start taking bolt cutters to gas pump cords. (That's my own innovation, by the way) I want to see a little bit of chaos to match the outrage. Chaos will get things done.

    The fact of the matter is, I don't see our oil-connected President/Vice President making leaps and bounds to do something about this. I hate to say it, but it's true. I'm not making any direct accusations. I don't think we went to war for oil. But what I do know is that our President and Vice President both were CEOs of oil companies, one of those being one of the world's biggest. This is a fact, and when these people are in charge, the same people who if they were not elected officials would be orgasming at the very sight of their bank accounts right now, there is room for a lot of eye-brow raising when you have $2.59 gas.

    When you're in charge of a company that sells oil, you want to be able to sell it for as high as possible. When you're a seller of anything for that matter. And because they are both former sellers of oil, it is just impossible for me to have any hope of something being done. And that's why I want riots. That's why I want to see people throwing Moltov Cocktails at gas pumps. I want their infrastructure to be attacked in retaliation to our wallets and bank accounts being attacked. It's a horrible thing to put absolutely insane prices on something that every American needs. This isn't bubble gum. This is what gets us to work every single day. We can't ride bikes, and most don't have mass transit. But some people are effected even worse than people just driving to work.

    Like fucking me for example. I am someone whose income is directly effected by these gas prices. It's not like I have to pay a few more dollars every week for gas. No no no. Let's do a little quick math.

    I deliver pizzas. When I started about a year and a half ago, gas prices were $1.69. And those were high prices at the time, by the way. For work, and for work only I need 8 gallons every day and I work 5 days a week. A year ago, my annual fuel cost would be $3,494.90. Using that same formula, my annual fuel cost this year, at $2.59 a gallon, will be $5,387.20. The difference? 1803.20. I don't know about you, but that's a lot of fucking money. Just to put it into perspective, its $150 a month, or $34 a week, or $5 a day. The day figure includes 365 days, not working days. This is a lot of fucking money, especially to a 19 year old with a car payment.

    This isn't negotiable for me. There's no way I can do anything about this. All I can do is bend over and take it, and it really fucking sucks. Every single day when I see those gas prices, I get pissed off. It's a reminder of how much money is being unfairly ceased from me by greedy oil companies. This is precisely why I smile and laugh when I see a story like this. Good for you, Husain. I bet you won't be enjoying the money you and company you represent steal from people who drive, which is just about everyone. So yeah, the money you steal from everyone over 16. You people are fucking horrible.

    And for the people who invest in any company related to oil. You are just as guilty. You invest your money into these companies that are robbing us, and you're the ones who are going to get our money back whenever you decide to sell your stock. Anyone who bought oil stock 1-2 years ago is going to get really fucking rich. It makes me sick, because it's money stolen from me among just about everyone else. It's the rich stealing from the poor. But that's capitalism.

    And to match capitalism, I'll invoke "Sickism", which is my philosophy, to match it. And a part of that philosophy is laughing my fucking ass off and being filled with glee when I see that a gas station owner kills himself while trying to stop someone stealing gas. I hope the $52 was worth it, douche bag. And I hope you're enjoying those 72 virgins in paradise, since you sort of died a martyr.

    August 20, 2005

    Only If We Meet!

    Hey look at this guy. He's 29, lives in Stroudsburg, PA and wants to fuck a 14 year old. Really badly in fact. He wants to teach her all about finding her G Spot and wants to get her on the shot so he can freely have sex with her without worrying about the possibility of getting pregnant. And he really really wanted to see naked pictures of this 14 year old girl. I mean really. He really pressured hard. But that's ok. He got a phone call from me in the middle of his masturbation session with what he thought was a 14 year old.

    If you would like to give Jay a phone call, you can contact him at 570 982 1064 and his Yahoo screen name is onlyifwemeet. He has a 23 year old girlfriend, so you might want to inform her that her boyfriend is trying to fuck 14 year olds on the internet. He'll probably have his cell phone off, so just leave him a message if he does that. Have a nice day you fucking pedophile douche bag.

    Here's the log over there in the unused Obscure Writing section. Time to put it to good use, as this will be the place where all logs will be posted. I'm gonna start a post on the sickest fuck I've met yet.

    August 19, 2005

    My New Hobby

    I've developed a fine new hobby on the internet. Catching sexual predators. It's really an absolute shit pool, and I'm having a really good time finding these sick fucks. This is going to be a main feature here on TheSick.Net and trust me, it'll be very entertaining. I already have one sick fuck caught and ready to post and one really sick fuck who's conversation I lost because I'm a retard. I need to work on him again and get another conversation out of him. I'll post the one I have a good grip on as soon as I'm sure that I'm done with this guy. I want to try and get more information from him.

    Anyways, meet Katie. Katie is 14 and lives in Ocala, Florida. She lives with her Mom who is a nurse, and who works 12 hour days. Katie is portrayed by none other than me, of course. It's pathetic how easy it is to catch these guys. It's also truly alarming and scary to see how willing people are to come meet a 14 year old girl, and how quickly they seek me out.

    My Yahoo screen name ends in "1990." All I do is go into a local Yahoo chat, and just sit there and wait. I usually get messaged within 2 minutes, but no more than 5. I'm barely trying. The real skill comes in when I'm talking to these sick fucks. Manipulating them into saying incriminating things, bringing more out of them, and the best of all; getting them to give me personal information. That's the best part. Because then I and other people can freely harass them. I want to try and get the employment information of the guy whom I already have all wrapped up before I nail him and expose him. I've got this guy so good, it's pathetic. You'll shit when I post this stuff.

    Like I said, I'm going to keep doing this because I think I'm pretty fucking good at it. And I really hate sexual predators, and if I can easily catch them and expose them on the Internet, then I'm going to commit as much time to that as possible. Expect the best post ever in a day or two, and expect a brand new feature that will expose a lot of sick fucks while completely ruining their lives in the process.

    August 17, 2005

    Weighing In On Gaza

    I think it's about time for me to weigh in on this whole Gaza situation. Fox News is absolutely obsessed with this story, whereas other more interesting stories are on the back burner. I mean really, this isn't that big of a story. It is for the potential of peace in the middle east, but they seem to be absolutely obsessed with jews, and their sadness over leaving.

    I thought the Jews would be wiser than this. The fact of the matter is that this is the first step from two extremely stubborn nations to achieve peace. Perhaps these angry Jews from Gaza need to realize that perhaps 16 year old kids can go to pizza parlors in other areas of Israel without the fear of being blown up. Maybe people can start riding the bus again. I just can't understand why they don't realize it.

    Perhaps the media is misrepresenting the true sentiment in Israel. What do the other Israelis think about this? I will credit them for not rebelling, and for at least peacefully protesting. Although I did read one report of a woman lighting herself on fire. "They knew how to stage on a goddamn protest. LIKE YA SELF ON FIRE." -George Carlin

    What I do know is that these people are being selfish. Sure, it sucks they're losing their homes. Are they just being kicked out? Are they being compensated in any way? These are important questions that the media isn't reporting on. They are being selfish though. The fact of the matter is, this is the first step from Israel. Someone needed to cave in first. Those homes and settlements just aren't worth it.

    The fact of the matter is, this is Palestinian land that was conquered in 1967. It's not even really theirs to begin with. I mean, this area is one of the main factors in this conflict. Israelis want peace and the terrorist scumbag Palestinians want all the Jews to die... But they will settle to have their shit back. If the Israelis aren't willing to eradicate the Palestinians, then this is the way to go. Take this first step, and see what happens. And the Jews of Gaza need to roll with it.

    Their sacrifice will lead to a safer more secure Israel. Now the terrorists have something to lose. The ball is in their court now, and if they follow the lead of Israel, and keep their shit together, then maybe peace can be a real possibility. It's definitely worth a try. I just wish these selfish Jews in Gaza would get it.

    But maybe I'm wrong, and maybe they're right. Maybe it's all pointless. Maybe the attacks are going to continue by Hezbollah and other jihadists. If this happens, then I believe it will be and should be their own death sentence. I see this as Palestine's chance to become legit. If they choose to fuck it up, then I would call for the complete and full eradication of Palestine.

    No really, I'm serious. You see, I believe they deserve one honest legitimate chance at being a normal state. And this is it. If they do good with this, perhaps they can get a little more. But if they fuck this up, then I fully support full-blown eradication. Like pests. Kill them all, I wouldn't care. I haven't forgotten the video I saw on TV on 9/11, of the Palestinians dancing in the fucking street in celebration. Oh no, I certainly have not forgotten that.

    I mean really, would it be that hard? Israel is an ally. We don't even have to send in troops. All we have to do is bring back the nuclear option. Can't we just threaten the Palestinians? Can't we just politely explain to them that if they continue to kill innocent people who are doing nothing but living their lives, then we will drop a nuclear weapon on them, killing them all? I bet that would deter them pretty fucking fast. They can blow themselves up, but they will have a pretty hard time stopping a bomb from falling.

    Like I said, this is their one legitimate chance at being civil. I don't even believe they deserve it. But the fact of the matter is that they aren't going to stop murdering innocents until something is done, so what else can you do? Nothing has worked yet, so why not try this. It is their one chance. If they choose to fuck it up, then I fully support total and complete eradication.

    August 16, 2005

    Cindy Sheehan Is a Cunt

    This woman is absolutely fucking despicable. She makes me sick. I mean really, I see this mannish whore on TV and I want to just launch my remote at her stupid fucking head. This is the problem.

    She is exploiting the death of her son in Iraq to push the far left agenda. The Michael Moore agenda. You know, that sort of shit. I don't believe this is all based on her being a grieving mother. I'm aware that alledgedly, the worst thing ever is losing a child. I understand that. But we're over 1800 dead in Iraq. I bet a good amount of those dead soldiers have a mother and father. So let's just throw out a figure of 3000 grieving parents. Out of those 3000, we're only hearing from 1 of them. I'm sure theres a few more, maybe a few dozen more. But 9 out of 10 grieving parents are fucking proud of their children, and support the cause they died for. They support their choice and the risk they took in being a part of America's army. They don't act out against the president.

    I have a lot more to say about the basics of this stupid cunt, but I want to move on to her commentary on michaelmoore.com. Yes, she is contributing to his website. Michael Moore is probably the biggest anti-American living in the United States. He hates America, he's extremely dishonest, and a very big liar. Watch Fahrenheit 9/11, and then watch Fahrenhype 9/11. You'll see. Watch his latest "documentary", which is actually a propaganda film, and you will see him blatantly exploit the horrific details of 9/11, like women screaming at the sight of people jumping from the building, grieving parents, wounded soldiers being taken out of context, and many other people being tricked into contributing to his movie while being taken out of context. He is truly, one of the most despicable fat fucking slobs on the face of the earth. And Cindy Sheehan is fully allied with him.

    Now that I've laid that out, I'll move on to her daily commentary on Michael Moore's website. I'll start with day 1, and pick out the good stuff and put it to shame like I'm so good at doing.

    "First of all, I did meet with George, and that is not a secret. I have written about it and been interviewed about it. I will stand by my recounting of the meeting. His behavior was rude and inappropriate." She has said the same shit on every channel she can get on. She's constantly saying shit like this now a days. And she keeps saying that all she wants is to meet with Bush, and then she'll leave.

    Here's the kicker. She already met with Bush. And it just so happens to be that she spoke to a local newspaper about her experience when she met Bush in June of 2004. Thank you Matt Drudge. Here's what she had to say about her meeting with Bush in 2004 when speaking to a local newspaper.

    "'I now know he's sincere about wanting freedom for the Iraqis,' Cindy said after their meeting. 'I know he's sorry and feels some pain for our loss. And I know he's a man of faith.'"

    "The meeting didn't last long, but in their time with Bush, Cindy spoke about Casey and asked the president to make her son's sacrifice count for something. They also spoke of their faith."

    "The trip had one benefit that none of the Sheehans expected. For a moment, life returned to the way it was before Casey died. They laughed, joked and bickered playfully as they briefly toured Seattle. For the first time in 11 weeks, they felt whole again."

    "'That was the gift the president gave us, the gift of happiness, of being together,' Cindy said."

    And there you fucking have it. She spoke very highly of the way she was treated by Bush and how much joy she brought him. And then, all of the sudden and out of nowhere she has completely changed sides. People jump to her defense, claiming she can change her opinion because there have been many developments since then. That's also bullshit. Her words are in reference to Bush's character and the way he treated her. This cannot change. And it's that simple. She's a lying, stupid bitch.

    "We need to show George Bush and his cabal of neocons that when we say 'bring the troops home, now' we mean 'bring the troops home, now!!!'"

    What an ignorant far left bitch. When people talk like this, they lose all credibility. This is extreme liberal vocabulary here. I've read a lot of it, and I can sense the bullshit from a while away. "cabal" and "neocon". These are words that the same extreme liberal assholes all use. Let's analyze.

    ca-bal: A conspiratorial group of plotters or intriguers.
    neocon: Is short for New(neo) Conservative. It basically means evil far right conservative.

    Typical bullshit from the left. This hag has no idea what she's talking about. What a pathetic woman. Let's move on to more of her bullshit. "We have concerned citizens from all over America starting to come in. IT IS FREAKIN AMAZING, FOLKS!!!"

    All of the truth can be found in this simple statement. You see, she's painting herself as this grieving mother that just wants answers. I've been absolutely miserable quite a few times in my life. Never lost someone I loved, but I've experienced misery. And I know that when you're in a deep depression, in misery, or grieving, you don't get excited for anything but what is going to make it all go away. Look at her get all excited, talking in caps and using not one, but three exclamation points. A miserable depressed person doesn't talk in caps and use exclamation points. Complete bullshit. How dare this fucking cunt use her son's death to push her far left political agenda. What a complete piece of shit. Forget about this whole "grieving mother" angle. It's a lie. She isn't a grieving mother. I'm sure she was. But not anymore.

    "We have such a strong coalition of groups. GSFP, Code Pink, Veterans for Peace, Military Families Speak Out and the Crawford Peace House." Oh really? I've never heard of any of those faggoty groups. I don't know what's to get excited about. You fucking hippy.

    "We will not let him have a 5 week nice vacation when there are millions of people in harm's way in Iraq due to his careless policies. The people of Iraq and our soldiers are suffering. Why should George have a nice vacation?"

    This bitch needs to learn to speak. "a 5 week nice vacation." What the fuck is that? What does it all mean, Basil? Perhaps she meant "a nice 5-week vacation." Maybe, maybe not. I don't know how much of a vacation it is. I mean, sure he's out of Washington. But he just signed that energy bill. And many members of his cabinet and Richard Myers were at his ranch the other day. Were they all swimming in the pool together, maybe?

    And since when were there fucking millions of people in harm's way in Iraq? Is she claiming there are a million troops in Iraq? Or is she including the Iraqi people? If she gave two shits about the Iraqi people, she wouldn't be on this "bring home the troops" tirade. You can't have it both ways, bitch. Either you give a shit or you do not give a shit about the Iraqi people. When you figure it out, let the media know. And as for the soldiers. They're proudly serving their country. Sure they miss home and they would rather be home. But they are damn proud doing what they're doing. More than the majority. This fucking skank has no idea what she's talking about.

    "Today started at 4am when the rain started blowing into my tent and my head and my feet started getting soaked then thunder and lightening came over my tent. I was really frightened for my life, so I abandoned ship and went into Crawford." I wish you would have been stricken by lightning, you dirty whore. Will you please die?

    "Still putting out the O'Reilly fires of me being a traitor and using Casey's name dishonorably, my in-laws sent out a press conference disagreeing with me in strong terms; which is totally okay with me, because they barely knew Casey. We have always been on separate sides of the fence politically and I have not spoken to them since the elections when they supported the man who is responsible for Casey's death. The thing that matters to me is that my family: Casey's dad and my other 3 kids are on the same side of the fence that I am."

    This is a good one. She disowns her family because they disagree with her politically. This is fucking nuts. I disagree with half of my family politically and the other half I disagree with religiously. And we all still love each other. It doesn't matter. Because family is family. This whore has no moral values. And then she has the fucking nerve to claim that Bush is responsible for his death. That's complete shit. Shite Muslims in Baghdad killed your son, you stupid fuck. He entered the military on his own. And he even entered the special quick response unit when rioting began in Baghdad. He knew that it was dangerous, and he chose to volunteer for this unit, on his own. By her own logic, Casey is responsible for Casey's death. But that isn't true at all. Her logic is bullshit. Shite Muslims are responsible for Casey's death. Period.

    And the thing that matters to her most is her 3 surviving children and her husband. They're all on the same side of the fence as her, huh? Lying whore. I'll bring this back in a moment. Keep it in mind.

    "I know before Casey was killed, I didn’t think that one person could make a difference in the world. Now I know that isn’t true. Not only can one person make a difference, but one person, with millions behind her can make history. I really believe that this movement that began in Crawford, Texas (does the irony escape anyone) is going to grow and grow and transform the world. Like I said last night in my blog: hope is blossoming in Crawford, because WE have the power."

    She's fucking delusional. I mean really. She has no concept of reality at this point. You're not making a difference in anything significant, you crazy bitch. The only difference she's making is what the news is talking about. She is not effecting anything significant. End of story. You have delusions of grandeur woman. You have no power at all. You're just a crazy far left bitch and a few hundred people out of the millions and millions in America agree with you.

    Oh, this is priceless. "George Bush: you work for me. I pay your salary. Come out and talk to me. Anyway, I have a feeling you are about to be fired!!!" Like I said, delusions of grandeur. And remember, miserable people do not exclaim. She's just so nuts. George Bush does not work for you. George Bush is an elected official and he works for EVERYONE, not just you. I know the concept is hard to grasp, but everything in this world does not revolve around you. Don't even mention his salary. What he is actually paid for his work as president is nothing compared to what he's made in the private sector. It's a moot point. He's not getting fired. Maybe in her dark nights sleeping in fire-ant infested tents on the side of the road in Texas, she has fantasies of this happening. But in reality, it's never happening.

    She's just so fake and so full of shit. Out of all the days she's been there, she's only actually slept in a tent maybe 3 times. She keeps going into town to sleep indoors. And she keeps trying to justify her reasons for not sleeping outside with everyone else. She feels the need to mention it and justify it, and it's just so pathetic. You fake whore.

    Now let's get to the grand finale! Yay! Some news came out yesterday. Something really funny happened on Friday. Her husband filed for divorce. HAH HAH HAH. BITCH. Yes yes, it's all true.

    Do you blame him? What's really going on behind the scenes? What happened to "The thing that matters to me is that my family: Casey's dad and my other 3 kids are on the same side of the fence that I am?" Hmm? Your husband is probably tired of you embarrassing your entire family and fucking dishonoring your own son's death by exploiting it for political reasons. You're a sick bitch. You're a lost cause, and hubby realized it. It really sucks to be you. You lost your son due to Shite Muslims, and now you lose the man who created that son because of your own actions. You can't blame this on Bush. This is all on you. I look forward to seeing you further destroy your own life. Cunt.

    And here's my argument winner. Imagine if somehow, Casey Sheehan magically appeared right there in Crawford, Texas. How do you think he would feel about what he was seeing? Casey is a hero and a patriot. I've spoken to many military people. I know that this would make him sick, as it makes this patriot sick. If she would think about the son, who's name she is doing all of this in, she would realize how fucking wrong she is. But she won't do it. Because it's all fiction. She's over her son. She's just angry, admittedly, and she's exploiting her son's death and horribly dishonoring her son all to push the extreme far left agenda. Have you no shame, cunt?

    August 15, 2005

    The Wiccan V, The Christian City Counsil

    Here's a great story coming out of Great Falls, North Carolina. This is an illustration of what can happen when people in power start bring their religious beliefs into play.

    Darla Wynne, who is apparently a Wiccan Priestess, whatever the fuck that is, has stirred up a whole lot of shit in this small town of 2,200. You see, sometimes when people who share different religious beliefs contrary to the big popular one get pissed off, you can have a very big problem on your hands.

    The city council of Great Falls were praying, and using the name of Jesus Christ in these prayers before all meetings. This is a clear breach of the 1st amendment. And this Wiccan, while goofy as fuck, got pretty pissed off about it and sued. She won.

    The damages to the town? $18,000. Those were the legal fees that Miss Wynne incurred. But it gets a whole lot better. You see, these local asshole politicians, these elected officials who take an oath to adhere to the constitution of the United States of America took it all the way to the supreme court. The supreme court told them to fuck off, and wouldn't hear their case. This process took two years. At this point, they are now responsible for $65,000 worth of legal fees. In cases like this, 9 times out of 10, the legal fees get paid. That lawsuit for those fees has recently been filed.

    $65,000 is 7& of Great Falls' annual budget. Way to go assholes. Way to piss away the taxpayer's hard earned money. All for what they believed was the right to hold prayer before government meetings. This baffles me on just so many levels. I mean, I literally hate everyone in this story. The Wiccan is the "good guy", but she still sucks because she's a Wiccan.

    First off, these people took an oath. All elected officials swear to adhere to the constitution. Even police officers take the oath. Yet they still knowingly broke the 1st amendment. If they're willing to break the 1st amendment, what's to stop these politicians from engaging in illegal activities? Like money laundering, racketeering, extortion, bribery, etc. Not a goddamn thing.

    Then, after they lose their case, they have the fucking nerve to keep fighting. Don't forget about their legal fees. That's even more taxpayer money. It should come out of their pockets. Not the citizens of North Carolina and Great Falls. That isn't right at all. How about all of the local Churches help pay both legal fees? Hmm? Isn't that fair and just?

    And this fucking lawyer. What a greedy piece of shit. He knows what he's doing. He knows he can charge an absurd amount of money and get it all back from the taxpayer. These degenerate politicians may be the cause of all of this, but it shouldn't be over a $65,000 problem. But that's greed for you. All this asshole had to do was read the 1st amendment. That's all it takes. $65,000 for a simple civil liberties case? It's bullshit, and he knows exactly what he's doing and the greed makes me sick, because he knows what he's doing and he knows he, in all reality, is the one who's stealing from the taxpayer.

    And now we come to this fucking Wiccan Priestess... What the fuck? I think the idea of any religion is dumb. Of all the religions, Wicca is about the most asinine of them all. I mean, it's one thing to believe in a God. It's another to believe in the secret power of mother nature, and to believe the Earth is alive and all that fucking goofy jazz. However, Wiccans, while extremely bizarre, seem to be smarter than the average Christian.

    If these Christians had even a slight amount of intelligence, they would know that they got caught with their hand in the cookie jar and would have stopped the prayer bullshit when the lawsuit was first filed. But no, they didn't do that. They kept on, and kept on, and kept on fighting. All based upon their religious beliefs. Not their interpretation of the constitution, but their religious beliefs. They want to be able to pray in the city council meetings. But our constitution just doesn't allow that sort of thing. How they could not know this is beyond me. Why they would keep fighting when they know they are absolutely wrong is beyond me. They prove their stupidity.

    And at the same time, they're opposed by a Wiccan who is pissed off. These Christians don't realize that just because they believe in the popular religion doesn't mean they can impose it on other people, or share those beliefs or religious rituals where they have absolutely no place. The Wiccan knew this, and exposed them. She won, because she was smarter and kept on fighting.

    All while these fine city officials wasted $65,000 which they will eventually have to pay to the Wiccan, not to mention their own legal fees. Way to go assholes. In the name of God. Way to piss away hard earned tax money.

    August 14, 2005

    ACLU Commits Treason

    The Pentagon is trying very, very hard to block the release of an additional 87 pictures and 4 videos from Abu Ghraib. Everyone remembers Abu Ghraib, right? Everyone was outraged. Everyone in the media, anyway. The left was absolutely out of their minds over this. The "abuse" of prisoners. Well, it happened. It's in the past now, and it did leave a mark.

    It's over with now. I mean really, it is. It's a dead story. It took its toll on the Bush administration and all of the pro-troop/pro-war people. That's all fine and dandy. I personally found every bit of it absolutely fucking hilarious. I am damn proud of every single man and woman who humiliated a prisoner. Actually, I don't see them as prisoners. That word means nothing to me. You see, my advanced brain processes this all much differently and faster, and I see these "prisoners" not as incarcerated individuals, but as people who were trying to murder our troops. So, let me rephrase my original statement. I am damn proud of every single man and woman who humiliated people who were trying to kill him or her and their fellow soldiers.

    I never really talked about Abu Ghraib here on the site. I had a lot of personal shit going on, and that wonderful story just sort of got passed up. So I feel the need to talk about the original story before I get into the current story.

    The fact of the matter is, anyone who condemns these men and women who were humiliating these scumbags are completely heartless, and are so disconnected with the human emotion that they might as well be killed. They wouldn't care. You see, I'm a feeler. I feel things. It's just the way I am, and it's automatic. I don't put myself in other peoples' shoes. I automatically go there in the opinion forming phase.

    With that being said, I just don't get how anyone could get mad over some soldiers taking out a bit of their stress, anxiety, and depression out on the people who are causing it. The people who want to kill them. The people who were trying very hard to kill them. Why does anyone give a shit about how those people are treated?

    I know the answer, and there is only one semi-logical argument to my stance. The only legitimate argument is that when they abuse the people who were trying to kill them, the terrorists, they sort of drop down to their level, and we're as a nation supposed to have better standards than that. This point I can understand, and to a point I agree with it.

    But in the end, I say fuck the standards. I say this sort of thing should happen every day at every prison in Iraq. And it should be kept secret, and treasonous reporters and soldiers who want to embarrass the United States should be put into military prisons. Not the people who were having the fun, and giving the pieces of shit about 1/10th of what they deserve.

    And they call it abuse. That's right. Some far left fucks will even call it torture. Yeah, look at the picture up there. That's not abuse or torture. It's humiliation, and they deserve a lot more than that. These are men who were trying to kill our men and women fighting over there. I wouldn't give a fuck if they were being systematically slaughtered. Fuck them. They mean shit to me.

    So, with all of that being said, let's move on to today's wonderful story. The ACLU is trying very very hard to get these remaining photos and videos released. I think maybe a dozen or less photos got out in the first place. There's an additional 87. I am more than positive that these pictures will be a lot worse than the others. I bet the ones we've seen are tame compared to these ones.

    But in the end, the result of Abu Ghraib had a negative effect on America. It pissed off the terrorists more, and it created new ones and made them fight more. It gave them more reason to kill. It was fuel to their fire. Remember the Quran in the toilet debacle? Hmm? Do you remember what a few days worth of that bogus story caused?

    Well think of that times 10, because that is what would happen if these 87 pictures and 4 videos are made public. So why would the ACLU try so hard to get them released? You know the answer, I don't need to tell you. And it makes me sick. It makes me sick that they're allowed to fully operate in the United States. It makes me sick that these lawyers aren't imprisoned and put to death for treason.

    This is treason, by the full definition of the word.

    trea-son: Violation of allegiance toward one's country or sovereign, especially the betrayal of one's country by waging war against it or by consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies.

    The entire ACLU and the lawyers who work for them are, by definition, 100% treasonous. I will prove it. Let's move on to the article to make my argument. (We'll come full circle here, I promise.)

    General Richard Myers is the one who's fighting this battle against the ACLU. And who is Richard Myers? Well, he just happens to be the #1 highest ranking of the military. He has two people above him. Donald Rumsfeld, and George Bush. He is the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Rummy and Bush wear suits. Myers wears a uniform. For lack of a better term, General Myers is the man.

    So, what did General Myers have to say about all of this mess? Here's every one of his words from the article.

    "But in an affidavit filed with the court on July 21 and unsealed this past week, Myers insists the release 'would aid the recruitment effort and other activities of insurgent elements.'

    He further states that should the pictures become public, they will 'endanger the lives and physical safety of the soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines in the United States Armed Forces presently serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.'"

    Want more? Yes, sir.

    "But he argues the situation in Iraq is 'dynamic and dangerous,' with US forces and their allies having to face on average 70 attacks a day mounted by an insurgent army that now numbers about 16,000.

    The top US military commander also suggests the release of new photos could have an effect similar to that caused by a since retracted Newsweek story about the desecration of the Koran at the US detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

    The story about the Islamic holy book allegedly being flushed down the toilet, which was published in April, sparked riots in Afghanistan that, according to Myers, claimed at least 17 lives."

    There you have it. Let's review, shall we? According to General Meyers, the man, if those 87 photos and 4 videos are released, then it will endanger the lives and physical safety of the soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines in the United States Armed Forces presently serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, it would aid the recruitment effort and other activities of insurgent elements for an army of 16,000 that already launches at least 70 attacks per day.

    So! With all of that being said by the man in charge, why would the ACLU try and cause all of that to happen? Because the ACLU is a terrorist organization in and of itself as they're aiding the enemy's cause. This is treason. You can't argue it. They are trying to do something that will aid the enemy in a very big way. And we come full circle now.

    The ACLU Executive Director, Anthony Romero needs to be fucking killed. If not, then he needs to be arrested and put in prison for treason. This is treason. I just don't understand how anyone can disagree. Go back up there and look at the definition of "treason."

    The ACLU is consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies. This is a truth and it's a fact. They prove their treason by their own behavior. It's all over the news. If Bush had a fucking sack on him, he would have this man arrested for treason, and he would put a stop to the ACLU. This is America for fuck's sake and we're fighting a war. We can't have enemies in our own country who have a massive amount of money and resources working for the enemy.

    If they succeed, their results will create many many more terrorists, and will ultimately kill many more American soldiers. The whole reason the Islamic terrorists want us all to die, and the whole reason why they've launched a Jihad is because they feel we're arrogant and we oppress them. They feel they are fighting an empire. What better way to recruit more members of your military than to generate more outrage and anger by Iraqi, Iranian, and Syrian people. The whole fucking middle east for that matter. It's treason, plain and simple.

    Bush is an asshole for not doing anything about it. Grow a sack, and detain him and anyone else who is acting against our national security. My fucking personal safety depends on this. What happened to Cowboy Bush, huh? What happened to "If you're not with us, you're with the terrorists?" I fucking loved that. But it was bullshit. Complete bullshit. The ACLU is not with us. The ACLU isn't with the terrorists by default. They are with the terrorists by their own choice, and something needs to be done before they cause even more harm to our men and women fighting in Iraq. Not to mention all of us sitting here safely in our house. As for Anthony Romero, I'm really surprised some gun loving fanatical American doesn't just kill this motherfucker. What happened to all the crazies, huh? 4-5 presidents were assassinated in our nation's time. Malcom X, Martin Luther King, JFK, RFK, Jesus Christ. All murdered by crazies. Is America that pussified? Where have all the crazies gone, who will make my dreams come true?

    I'd even settle for the abduction of the leader of the ACLU. Just someone, please, kidnap him, and just, you know... let him live in your basement or something for a while in shackles. You don't necessarily have to kill him. I just want whatever will make the ACLU go away. So less soldiers die, and so we are more safe in America. Isn't it obvious that a faction of Al Qaeda is masked as a human rights organization in the United States? Isn't that obvious yet?

    August 11, 2005

    Shitting On The 1st Amendment

    Amendment I
    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    I love it when I wake up and see a news story that tells me all about how today's judges are pissing and shitting all over the Constitution. It makes me absolutely fucking sick. This isn't finding loopholes, or mild skirting of our historical constitutional protections. This is full out pissing and shitting. For those who can't sink down to my level of colorful vocabulary, I will rephrase. They are fully and blatantly doing things that the constitution says shall never happen. I hope that was simple enough.

    From Richmond, Virginia... Heh, Virginia, our first colony. It makes me fucking sick that of all places for this to be happening, it's here.

    "An appeals court on Wednesday upheld a Virginia law that requires public schools to lead a daily recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance, rejecting a claim that its reference to God was an unconstitutional promotion of religion." Ok, so let's lay this out before I get into the details of the story. The 3 judge panel on this appeal's court upheld a law that was challenged. That law being a mandatory recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. It's a good law, but the problem isn't with the law. The problem is with the Pledge, and that problem makes the law unconstitutional. This isn't even debatable. It's a fact. The law is unconstitutional. And why is that? Let's look at the pledge.

    "I Pledge Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

    That's all great for kids to be reciting every morning. Except for that whole "one nation under God" part. Look up at the first paragraph. See that bold text? That's our very first amendment. The first, and the grand daddy of them all. Those first words of this first amendment say "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."

    Well, the whole problem is that Congress did make a law respecting an establishment of religion. They did it with this law that requires children to recite the pledge and they did it in 1955. What happened in 1955? Well believe it or not, that whole "one nation under God" part was never a part of the Pledge. A religious fanatic who somehow managed to become president lead the campaign in getting that part added to the pledge. In 1955, Congress added it, along with "In God We Trust" on our money.

    First of all, put yourself in President Eisenhower's mindset. You become president, and you think it's actually a good idea to add your beliefs into the fucking Pledge of Allegiance and all over our money. This is the type of behavior you'd expect from tyrants and dictators. But somehow, the American people let it happen. So just know that this whole "one nation under God" thing is relatively new.

    There is no disputing this. When you, by law, must refer to yourself and your nation as one nation under God, you are obeying a law that is made based on an establishment of a religion. It's not fucking allowed. It should have never happened in 1955, and this fucking 3 member panel of dead weight cocksuckers who didn't strike this law down need to be shot and killed. They're not real Americans.

    When you are a fucking Judge, your only job is to interpret the law and the constitution. Because they did not strike down this law, they have clearly shown their incompetence along with their complete inability to judge.

    There is no dispute. There is nothing to argue. "One nation under god" in our Pledge, in and of itself does not infringe on the constitution. However, when you are forced, by state law, to recite that Pledge in a state school, then that is in complete violation of the first amendment.

    Like I said, there's no debating it. You can't get into semantics. You can't find loopholes, and you can't skirt it. It's an establishment of religion that children are forced to recite. Children are forced to acknowledge a God. And this pisses and shits on the amendment that gives me the very write to say what I'm saying.

    Let's get into this article a little bit before I burst a vein in my brain due to the anger that this fucking shit is causing me. The lawyer who was going against the state on this case said, "The problem is that young school children are quite likely to view the pledge as affirming the existence of God and national subordination to God," Remes said. "The reference to God is one of the few things in the pledge that children understand."

    Think back and remember if you can. I know I can, and he is exactly right. I'm upset that I didn't think of this point. When you're a young child in school, that entire pledge is complete fucking gibberish except for that God part. I remember, and he is right. Honestly, I'm not just saying this because it fits my argument. In all truthfulness, I remembering reciting the pledge like a zombie and only understanding two parts. Pledging Allegiance and God. When I was little, religion was not forced upon me. School is where I got the idea of God and where I got the idea that we were a nation under God. But that isn't true. I'm speaking honestly, and I am not just saying this because it fits my fight. This is all truth, and I don't think that 7-8 year old Matt was a whole lot different than all the other kids.

    So with that being said, you have to understand how powerful the pledge becomes to a child reciting it. The lawyer made a great point, and he is exactly right because I remember. All those big words in the pledge, a child does not understand. He or she may know what the words mean, but they don't understand the statements. Republic? What does it stand for? One nation under God? Oh I know who God is, I get that. Indivisible? What's indivisible? What is with liberty? Justice for who? See what I'm saying? The pledge was written for adults, not children. A child really gets "One nation under God" compared to all of the other stuff in that short little recitation. It's brainwashing. I know this for a fact, because I remember.

    Let's analyze Judge Williams' decision. "Undoubtedly, the pledge contains a religious phrase, and it is demeaning to persons of any faith to assert that the words 'under God' contain no religious significance," Judge Karen Williams wrote. "The inclusion of those two words, however, does not alter the nature of the pledge as a patriotic activity."

    You insane, lying bitch. This fucking woman needs to be thrown off the bench and be forced to convert to Islam, just so she knows how it feels to have a religion forced down your fucking throat. She admits that the Pledge contains a religious phrase, and she even admits that it would be demeaning to people who believe in God to say that the words "under God" contain to religious significance. It's not just "under God." It's the whole phrase. "One nation under God." That is the problem. It is a declaration that we are one nation under God. She knows it, but Judges are elected at this level and not appointed and they have to worry about getting reelected when it comes to very important cases like this.

    She goes on to say that the inclusion of those two words (actually it's the 4 fucking words that's the problem) do not alter the nature of the Pledge, which is a patriotic activity. That fact is absolutely irrelevant. The fact of the matter is, as of 1955, the Pledge contains an establishment of religion and to force children to recite this establishment of religion is to be unconstitutional. And if you're a judge, acting unconstitutionally, then you should be punished severely. There is no debate.

    I only wonder how much longer I will be able to sit here and do this before a President, a Congress, or a Judge decides it'll be a good idea to stop brilliant people who are too smart for their own good from speaking their mind. It'll happen sooner or later. They're pissing and shitting on our 1st amendment, and no one seems to care except for me. Probably because I love it so much. It's ok though. They'll start screwing with your favorite amendment sooner or later. Then maybe once everyone has their favorite freedom taken away, we might do something about it. Fucking fake democracy.

    August 09, 2005

    Cokehead Chavez

    My G4 iMac took a shit. I woke up and the 17" flat screen display was not very functional. It was terrible. I had to drive it 50 miles to be fixed, and I'll probably have it back in a few days. So in the mean time, my extremely sweet and generous girlfriend let me borrow her laptop. She's a lifesaver. Without a computer, I'm like a child without his Mom. I just don't know what to do with myself. So with that said, on to the news.

    Let's talk Chavez. Hugo Chavez, the President of Venezuela has a beef with the US. Apparently, he is under some warped irrational impression that Venezuela is somehow an enemy and a target of the United States. He thinks we want to bomb them. Obviously, he does way too much coke.

    "But Chavez said late Monday that the U.S. government, which 'won't stop caressing the idea of invading Cuba or invading Venezuela,' should be warned of the consequences. 'If someday they get the crazy idea of coming to invade us, we'll make them bite the dust defending the freedom of our land,' Chavez said to applause.

    What is this fucking goof ball talking about? Is he just jumping on the "I Hate America" bandwagon? I mean, this is all coming straight out of left field. And does he actually believe for a minute that the fucking Venezuelian army could actually stop the US? Does he actually believe it? Of course not. He just can't. He would have to be clinically insane to actually believe it. So with that being said, I'm guessing that he just doesn't like America and when he was in front of a crowd, he decided it was a good idea to say a whole bunch of shit that would make them cheer. Fair enough. I can still make fun of it though.

    "Chavez called the United States the "most savage, cruel and murderous empire that has existed in the history of the world."... What the fuck? That's nowhere even near true. That's something far beyond an exaggeration. That is more like a completely psychotic statement. There is no way that any sane indivdual who knows a thing about history could objectively look at the United States and come to the conclusion that we are the most save, the most cruel, and the most murderous empire that ever existed in all of recorded history. We're not even a fucking empire for Christ's sake. Seriously, I believe this man pulled a Tony Montana and just did about 27 lines of coke before this speech.

    And then Cokehead Chavez shows his true colors. "The Venezuelan leader said 'socialism is the only path,' and told the students the collective goal is to 'save a world threatened by the voracity of U.S. imperialism.'" And they we have it. Socialism is the only way. And everyone's goal is to save the world from the imperialistic United States. This coming from the socialist and mild communist.

    I have a goal and a hope. My hope is to see Venezuela just disappear. We don't need them. I hope a fucking tsunami hits that country. We don't need socialists or communists. We just need world leaders who will work together to make everything better. When you have some coked up madman saying shit like this, then we have a serious problem. If I ever see a penny of American dollars going to this fucking shithole of a country, I'm going to be quite pissed.

    August 08, 2005

    Sunday Tradition

    Sundays suck. They're shitty news days and there's nothing to talk about. So as of today, every Sunday at TheSick.net is going to be my special religious assault day. I got nothing on Sundays. So I might as well dip into my massive reserve of anti-religious rhetoric.

    Some Sundays I'll make fun of the bible. Sometimes I'll make fun of the Quran. Sometimes I'll make fun of whatever I find hilarious regarding religion. Today though, I'm going to quote he who is known simply as "The Man". You might know him as George Carlin. I'm going to type this all out myself, so if there's any typos, forgive me.

    George Carlin - 1996 (Part 1)

    Why is it that most of the people who are against abortion are people you wouldn't want to fuck in the first place? Huh? Boy, these conservatives are really something, aren't they? They're all in favor of the unborn. They will do anything for the unborn. But once you're born, you're on your own.

    Pro-life conservatives are obsessed with abortion from conception to 9 months. After that they don't want to hear from you, they don't want to know about you, they don't want to know nothing. No new natal care, no daycare, no head start, no school lunch, no food stamps, no welfare, no nothing. If you pre-born, you're fine. If you're preschool, you're fucked.

    Conservatives don't give a shit about you until you read: Military Age. They they think you are just fine. Just what they've been looking for. Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. Pro-life.

    These people aren't pro-life. They're killing doctors. Want kind of pro-life is that? What, they'll do anything they can to save a fetus but if it grows up to be a doctor they just might have to kill it? They're not pro-life. You know what they are? They're anti-woman. Simple as it gets. Anti-woman. They don't like them. They don't like women.

    They believe a woman's primary role is to function as a brood-mare for the state. Pro-life. You don't see many of these white anti-abortion women volunteering to have black fetuses transplanted into their uteruses, do ya? No, you don't see them adopting a whole lot of crack babies, do ya? No... That might be something Christ would do.

    And! You won't see... And you won't see a lot of these pro-life people dousing themselves in kerosene and lighting themselves on fire. You know, morally committed religious people in South Vietnam knew how to stage a goddamn demonstration, didn't they? Huh?! They knew how to put on a fucking protest. Light ya self on FIRE! Come on you moral crusaders, let's see a little bit of smoke... to match that fire in your belly.

    Here's another question I have. How come when it's us, it's an abortion. And when it's a chicken, its an omelet? Are we so much better that chickens all of the sudden? When did this happen that we passed chickens in goodness? Name 6 ways we're better than chickens... See! Nobody can do it. You know why? Because chickens are decent people. You don't see chickens hanging around in drug gangs, do ya? Nah... You don't see chickens strapping some guy to a chair and hooking up a car battery to his nuts, do ya? When's the last chicken you heard about came home from work and beat the shit out of his hen? Huh?! It doesn't happen. Because chickens are decent people.

    So let's get back to this abortion shit. Now... Is a fetus a human being? This seems to be the central question. Well if a fetus is a human being, how come the census doesn't count them? If a fetus isn't a human being, how come when there's a miscarriage they don't have a funeral? If a fetus is a human being, how come people say, "We have two children and one on the way" instead of saying "We have three children." People say live begins at conception, I say life began about a billion years ago and it's a continuous process. Continuous, just keeps rolling along.

    Listen, you can go back further than that. What about the carbon atoms? Huh?! Human life could not exist without carbon. So is it just possible that maybe we shouldn't be burning all this coal? Just looking for a bit of consistency here in these anti-abortion arguments.

    See, the really hardcore people will tell you that life begins at fertilization. Fertilization, when the sperm fertilizes the egg. Which is usually just a few moments after the man says "Gee honey I was gonna pull out but the phone rang and it startled me." But even after the egg is fertilized, it's still 6 or 7 days before it reaches the uterus and pregnancy begins. And not every egg makes it that far. 80% of a woman's fertilized eggs are rinsed and flushed out of her body once a month during those delightful few days she has. They wind up on sanitary napkins and yet they are fertilized eggs. So basically what these anti-abortion people are telling us is that any woman who has had more than one period is a serial killer.

    Consistency. Hey, if they really want to get serious, what about all the sperm that are wasted when the state executes a condemned man while one of these pro-life guys who's watching cums in his pants? Huh?! Here's a guy standing over there with his jockey shorts full of little Vinny's and Debbie's and nobody's saying a word to the guy. Not every ejaculation deserves a name.

    Now, speaking of consistency. Catholics, which I was until I reached the age of reason... Catholics and other Christians are against abortions and they're against homosexuals. Well who has less abortions than homosexuals? Leave these fucking people alone for Christ's sake. Here is an entire class of people guaranteed never to have an abortion. And the Catholics and Christians are just tossing them aside. You'd think they'd make natural allies. Go look for consistency in religion.

    And speaking of my friends the Catholics, When Cardinal John Conner of New York and some of these other Cardinals and Bishops have experiences their first pregnancies and labor pains, and they've raised a couple of children on minimum wage, then I'll be glad to hear what they have to say about abortion. I'm sure it'll be interesting. But... In the mean time what they ought to be doing is telling these priests who took a vow of chastity to keep their hands off the alter boys. Keep your hands to yourself, father. (In 1996 he said this. Amazing.) When Jesus said "Suffer the little children. Come unto me," that's not what he was talking about.

    See, you know what I tell these anti-abortion people? I say "Hey... Hey... If you think a fetus is more important than a woman, try getting a fetus to wash the shit stains out of your underwear." For no pay, and no pension. I say "Think of an abortion as term limits." That's all it is. Biological term limits.

    Part 2 next Sunday!

    August 06, 2005

    George Pataki is a Sadist

    George Pataki, The Republican Governor of New York. What a fucking asshole this man is. You know, more often than not I give the benefit of the doubt to the republicans before the democrats. However, when insane shit like this happens, I throws me right back in the middle, wondering who is more insane.

    George Pataki has used the powers vested in him to veto a bill that would have allowed pharmacies to freely distribute the morning-after pill without prescriptions. Why would he possibly veto such a bill? Why would this pill have to be prescribed in the first place? First off, let me describe the morning-after pill. Many people are misinformed on what this pill actually does.

    There are a few different variations of the "morning-after pill", but they all have one thing in common. They contain very high doses of hormones, and sort of trick your body into thinking you're already pregnant. It is the same as birth control. It's just a high dose. This high dose must be taken within 72 hours, because that's how long it takes the spermy wormies to implant the egg. You can still take the morning-after pill after 72 hours, but then it would probably be considered a chemical abortion rather than sort of a "cock blocking" of the spermy wormy. I'll clarify, because this is important to the pro-life people.

    If you take the pill within 72 hours, you are merely tricking your body, and preventing the sperm from implanting the egg. No harm, no foul. You're simply interfering with the impregnating process. Nothing is growing. However, after that 72 hours, something may be growing. We're talking a matter of millimeters here. You can still take the pill, and it can still be effective within a reasonable amount of time, and probably without negative effects. Massive doses of this hormone in the pill will cause an abortion, a miscarriage, a murder, whatever you want to call it. No matter how far along the woman is. Generally, if you take it within a week, you'll be fine. It's just that 72 hour mark that determines wether you're preventing birth in an emergency situation where some guy decided it was a good idea to cum inside you, or wether you're aborting a week old fetus, the size of a lima bean. More on all of this in a bit.

    So that's that. However, I'm sort of speaking in a black market kind of way. Doctors will always tell you to never take it after 72 hours. Doctor Sick says that you'll be fine if you take it within a week. So what's Pataki's problem? What's his deal? What's his issue? What is wrong with a girl having the power to walk into a Walgreens and get the morning-after pill during her lunch break rather than make a doctor's appointment, call off work, spend a hundred bucks at the doctor, and THEN be prescribed the pill. What's wrong with cutting out the middle man? What happens if you fuck a guy on Friday night? The doctor is closed Saturday and Sunday. You are forced to goto the emergency room. If not, you're pregnant and you can't do shit about it at that point. Just because of the timing. So what the fuck is going on here? Enter insane Republican babble.

    The CNN article goes on to say "Pataki, who had announced Sunday that he would veto the measure, said he was most upset that the bill did not require minors to see a physician. 'We can do better,' said the governor, who pledged to work with sponsors of the legislation to come up with a proposal he would sign."

    Isn't that fucking lovely. It's the fucking minors who need this bill the most. What happens when 16 year old Michelle gets drunk and has sex at a party on Friday night. What does she do? She is forced to go tell her Dad how she got drunk and let 3 guys have sex with her. Right? Then Dad have the opportunity to beat the shit out of her. All because she couldn't just admit to being a fuck-up to herself and goto a Walgreens and get the shit she needs so she doesn't ruin her life by having a child at 16. Where is the fucking logic?

    The pill isn't harmful. It isn't a dangerous pill. It isn't an abused pill. People aren't selling it on the streets. It's a fucking emergency contraceptive that is used when people realize they fucked up and they need to act quickly so they don't ruin their life with a child they can't take care of, thereby ruining that very child's life in the process. Why doesn't this elected leader of the most popular state in the entire nation get this? Enter shady motives.

    Mr. Pataki isn't running for a 4th term as Governor. He has announced this. I wonder why that is. Could it be that he wants to focus all of his attention on the big 08? Many people, including the executive director of the New York chapter of Abortion Rights Action League believe it. And I believe it too. I've learned this: When politicians do absolutely senseless things, they are pandering to the senseless voter. The same as Hillary with her assault on GTA.

    Pataki went on to say a few more interesting things, one of which I do sort agree with. But it's a confusing point."The governor said he wanted a limit on the number of pills that could be dispensed at one time and did not want men to be able to get them, as would have been permitted under the vetoed legislation. He also said the bill should require patients getting the morning-after pill to receive counseling on the health risks of unprotected sex."

    One good point, and the rest is stupid fucking babble. Counseling? Give me a fucking break. I do sort of agree that men should not be allowed to get the pills. I don't like the idea of men being able to get the pill and slip it into a girls drink or food. However, what happens in a case where the woman wants the pill, but is too embarrassed to get it? This is a shady area, and a solution to this should have been in place in the legislation. It's not my fucking job to think of it. Like I said, that is a good point. But you can't say "no males". Besides, with a 72 hour time frame, why should a bitch have the right to say "your sperm is in me and I'm gonna have your baby and you will be attached to me for life" while she waits to be fertilized. I don't think that's fair at all. This is a confusing part of this issue.

    I think that within those 72 hours, a guy has as much say as the girl does. This is in the same area as what happens when a girl you're having sexual relations with stops taking her birth control. Why should that man be responsible for a child he doesn't want when he was duped into creating it? I think legislation is needed here. I support a law when it effects someone's right to life, liberty, and property. A girl pulling a stunt like this, which I've seen happen a lot, effects all three. And it's perfectly legal. But no politician has the sack to do anything about it.

    I'm just completely fed up with all of this shit. The pandering fake politicians. The fake democracy we live in. The old forcing the young to reproduce. Women popping out babies they can't take care of. Politicians forcing them to do so. Women getting pregnant in sneaky shady ways to keep their boyfriend. It's shit. Absolute shit. It's these fucking fake assholes like Pataki who fuck this Democracy up. There is absolutely no reason whatsoever to veto the bill. None at all.

    The only reason to veto the bill is to make it harder for girls to not get pregnant. Why would you want to do that? Why would anyone want to make it harder for a girl who made a mistake, to fix her mistake? I find that absolutely sadistic and evil, and I hope Pataki drops dead in his bathroom.

    My Photo
    Name:
    Location: Beverly Hills, Florida, United States

    I'm Matt The Sick and I am a loud mouth. I am slowly taking over the world. Keep reading about my adventures and my brutal exposure of the truth.