Signing Away Freedom

Take a good look at that picture to the left. This is freedom being signed away, by a disgusting individual who doesn't deserve to set foot on American soil. Abortion was banned yesterday in South Dakota.

Now if you read my previous post on this story, before it was signed into law, you will see that South Dakota has a population of around 700,000, which compared to Rhode Island, over 1,000,000, is very few people per square mile. The fact that abortion is being banned doesn't really matter too much to me. Of course, I believe in a woman's right to choose, but that fact is honestly irrelevant right now.

With me, this isn't about abortion. It's about freedom. This disgusting cunt, Mike Rounds, signed away a woman's right. He has now created a slippery slope with no opposition. This is what you people need to think about, because wether you believe in abortion or not makes not one bit of god damn difference at this point. What matters is your opinion on freedom. Fine, let these simple-minded South Dakota shit balls take away abortion. But what's next? Really consider that. What freedom do you enjoy, that others may not?

If South Dakota, and Mike Rounds believe they have control over what a woman does with her body regarding pregnancy, then consider what's to stop this state, or any other state now that the slippery slope has been created, to control something else that a woman or a man does. Tattoos? Homosexuality? Piercing? Rated R movies? Smoking? HBO? Guns? Hunting? I could go on for a long time.

Here's a perfect example. I don't believe in hunting anything without the intent to eat it. I don't like hunters or people who get off on killing things just to kill them. Does that mean that I believe it should be banned? Of course not, because I know I have freedoms that others do not agree with. It's a silent agreement. You can do the shit that I don't like as long as I can do the shit that you don't like. But this isn't the case anymore. Abortion is banned in South Dakota, and there is now a possibility that it could be banned nation-wide. Which of course, is fine. Just consider one of your freedoms being banned, and maybe we can go back to the silent agreement. It works better.

Now let's take a look at this CNN article, because it's a goody. This Governor isn't very good at being a politician. He let's his scumbag aura shine right through that stupid fucking suit, not to mention the fact that he really isn't that intelligent of a person. It's honestly a bit embarrassing. Let's get to it.

"In the history of the world, the true test of a civilization is how well people treat the most vulnerable and most helpless in their society," said a statement released by Rounds, a Republican.

"The sponsors and supporters of this bill believe that abortion is wrong because unborn children are the most vulnerable and most helpless persons in our society. I agree with them."

Oh really? Your little quote in the first paragraph is quite accurate. However, the true test of a civilization is also determined by its intelligence and understanding of facts. Your quote may be accurate, but your understanding of it is all wrong. The most vulnerable in our society are woman and children. We know that priests continue to boyfuck everyday and child molesters are given light slaps on the wrists every day. Scratch off children. They aren't being protected. Then we have women. They were being protected quite nicely, and after the womens' rights movement, they had lots and lots of protection and power. Now, because of this cuntbag, women in South Dakota have been dealt a fairly brutal blow. One less major right they have.

Woman and children are the most vulnerable. Not "unborn children." Ya know why they're not vulnerable? Because they are unborn. Un-fucking-born. They are not dependent, it takes very little for them to survive there in that womb, and 20% of all pregnancies end abruptly with miscarriage. The pregnancy process is pretty automated. Things take care of themselves. The unborn cannot be the most vulnerable, because they're not here yet. And if you really cared about the most vulnerable in society, you would protect their fucking rights. Not ban them.

In his statement, however, Rounds pointed out that the bill does not prohibit doctors from prescribing contraceptive drugs before a pregnancy is determined, such as in a rape or incest case. State lawmakers had rejected proposed amendments that would have made exceptions for rape or incest.

Is it not disgusting that the house members of South Dakota actually intentionally excluded rape and incest victims. Does it not just make you want to puke all over your keyboard? I hope they all get raped in the ass by giant black men. They did however, leave a nice little loophole in there. You see, the quote mentions contraceptive medicine. This basically means birth control. The morning after pill, even. Do you know what the morning after pill is? It isn't necessarily a pill. It's basically safely overdosing on "the pill," causing your body to intentionally miscarry the fetus. So, as long as your pregnancy hasn't been determined, it's perfectly safe and legal to take lots of birth control pills to abort the pregnancy. On your own. Way to go assholes, I bet this is going to be a great option for the ladies of South Dakota. They will do it too, because it's the best and safest option. Law does not change human behavior, trust me on that. Read your local arrest reports and see that half of them are DUI and marijuana possession arrests.

And here is the kicker, to cement the fact that Mike Rounds is an absolute scumbag.

"We must help each mother to see the value of the gift that is a child, and nurture the mother for her own sake and for the sake of her child," Rounds said in the statement.

Read that again. This motherfucker actually believes that it is his responsibility to force every single pregnant female to see the gift that a child is. These are his words, I could not even make this up. Really think about that. He actually said "We must help (force) each mother to see the value of the gift that is a child." Which translates into "We must force each mother to have children and be dependent on the government, whose children will grow up to pay taxes. It's a win win situation.

Just think about this. Do you know what keeps politicians in power? Dependency and money. How do you think the nation's most loathed politician has been reelected, Ted Kennedy, over and over and over again? Money and dependency. That's all it takes. Create a population dependent on your legislative powers, based upon their fears and way of life, and you will keep them in power. Now we get to the money part. Think about this little gem - Just in rural ass South Dakota, 800 abortions are performed yearly. This is from a state that has one fucking abortion clinic. Take away that small number of abortions (in relativity of course), and you have an extra 14,400 people in 18 years. That many more people paying taxes. If every one of those people people $2000 a year in taxes, that equals an extra 28.8 million dollars in 18 years, when they're at that tax-paying age. Nice isn't?

So now that I've shown you why they're doing this, and now that I've established the dependency and money factors, just remember that it's happening at your cost. Your freedoms are being smashed to keep them in power. That scumbag up there signed a major women's right away, for his own personal gain. For republicans as a whole in South Dakota. For their future gain. All the while, a precious right is banned and one of yours could be next. In South Dakota, the act of banning rights has created a slippery slope nation wide. The slippery slope is beyond dangerous, and it's just a matter of time before one of your rights steps up to the plate. America isn't what it used to be.

Read the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, then get back to me on this issue. If anyone actually read these documents, they would know that the true American Spirit is completely against what is happening here. If I lived in South Dakota, I would fucking riot.