Missing

Due to the irresponsible actions of the fucking idiot who was in charge of my home when I was on vacation, my dog whom I have raised since he was a puppy is gone. The person in question, who I will call "Dumbshit" watched our house last year, as well as my dog, with no problem. In fact, the only reason here was to watch my dog for 4 days. He's an irresponsible cocksucker, and due to his negligence, my dog is missing.

Since 8 am Wednesday the 24th, I have slept about a total of 6-7 hours, eaten 2 small meals, and work. So not including that, I have been looking for my dog. I upped the reward to $1000 after the first day. I'm fucking beyond desperate. This dog is no different than a child to me. Period.

So that's my current situation. I just wanted to check in. I won't be posting or commenting on anything until he's back home. I don't care if terrorists truck bomb the empire state building. Like I said, my life now consists of very little eating, very little sleep, work, and looking for my dog Saber. If I didn't need to make money to continue the search, I wouldn't even goto work.

The good news is that he was spotted today, and my Mom got within 5 feet of him before he bolted. We at least have an idea of where he is. I'm off to go walk around peoples' backyards and drive all night now.

A Picture Share!

Tigger says he loves my site.

A Picture Share!

Dinner. Sid is nowhere in sight. I think he already escaped with Buzz and Woody.

A Picture Share!

What a bullshit price for a fucking payday.

I Don't Want Rabies

Ok, I think it's fairly safe to say at this point that the terrorism bullshit is getting out of hand. Let's review the major terrorist attacks in the world in the past... long time. I will exclude all the miscellaneous bullshit between Israel and Palestine.

1992 - World Trade Center Bombed
1998 - American embassy in Tanzania bombed
1998 - American embassy in Nairobi, Kenya bombed
2000 - U.S.S. Cole bombed in Yemen
2001 - Biggest terrorist attack ever - 3000 killed in the biggest city in America
2002 - Bali nightclub bombing - 202 dead
2003 - Nothing, doing good
2004 - Madrid bombing - 191 dead, 1,460 wounded - As a result, Spain leaves Iraq
July - 2005 - London bombings - 50 dead
July - 2005 - London bombings pt 2 - 4 subway/train bombs failed, and 50 doomed people survived
July - 2005 - Massive bombing in tourist city in Egypt - 83 dead, so far

And what do every single one of these attacks have in common? They're all Muslims. I won't call them extremists. I won't call them Muslim Fanatics. Because this is what I've realized. The so called "good Muslims" are terrorists who don't have the balls to step up and do anything. Their faith commands them to do this. I've read the Quran, I know the hate it preaches towards the infidels. Let's take a look.

"Strike off their heads then, and strike off from them every finger-tip."

How do you like that? Right in their fucking holy book. Think it's taken out of context? OK. Let's look at it in context.

"When thy Lord spake unto the angels, "I will be with you: therefore stablish ye the faithful. I will cast a dread into the hearts of the infidels." Strike off their heads then, and strike off from them every finger-tip. This, because they have opposed God and his apostle: And whoso shall oppose God and his apostle. . . . Verily, God will be severe in punishment. "This for you! Taste it then! and for the infidels is the torture of the fire!" O ye who believe! when ye meet the marshalled hosts of the infidels, turn not your backs to them: Whoso shall turn his back to them on that day, unless he turn aside to fight, or to rally to some other troop, shall incur wrath from God: Hell shall be his abode and wretched the journey thither!"

Just so you know, if you're reading this website, you are an infidel. Anyone who doesn't believe in Allah, and any non-Muslim is an infidel. Neat, huh? I pulled this information out of the Quran myself. I didn't find it on a website. I used my own eyeballs and my own reading and my own searching. Let's look at a couple more good quotes I've collected.

"O Prophet! make war on the infidels and hypocrites, and deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their abode! and wretched the passage to it!"

"Believers! wage war against such of the infidels as are your neighbours, and let them find you rigorous: and know that God is with those who fear him."

"Many a time will the infidels wish that they had been Muslims. Let them feast and enjoy themselves, and let hope beguile them: but they shall know the truth at last. We never destroyed a city whose term was not prefixed."

I could really throw in about 20 more, but I think I've made my point. Islam is the problem. Islam is the rabies that's causing these mutts to froth at the mouth and kill us. They're only products of a religion, a disease. Islam is a problem. And no one in the mainstream media is talking about it. The fact of the matter is, these aren't just extremists. The ones who aren't killing are simply afraid and pacified.

Let's make a comparison. What happened when Timothy McVeigh killed 150 something people in Oklahoma City in the name of religion? Every single religious organization under the sun condemned him. Whenever these pieces of shit do anything, we'll get one, maybe two Muslim leaders who come out and give some half-assed condemnation. That's all you need to look at.

How many more people are going to be murdered in the name of the religion of peace before the world community as a whole comes into the agreement that Islam is a religion of hate and murder. How many more people are going to die before we fight the real enemy; Islam. They're ruining it for themselves. In America, everyone has the right to freely pratice their religion. Well, what if the religion they practice includes illegal crimes? Like, I don't know... Mass death, decapitation, etc. What should be done then? What if my religion involved cow fucking? I'll call it Sickism. and I start a big ass cult, and then as a result thousands of cows are dying from being fucked by my followers. Don't you think that somehow, someone might try and ban Sickism? I'm pretty sure they would. And the analogy goes like this: Sickism/Cowfuckingism = Islam/Massmurderism.

And now we're back at full circle. Watching the news, just waiting to see where the next bomb is going to go off. It's not a question of if, but when is it going to happen here? When are the subways in New York City going to be bombed? When is some nut going to set off his bomb belt at Yankee Stadium? It'll always be a fear, and they will always be a threat just as long as this politically correct bullshit keeps going on. Our politicians are throwing us to the wolves.

Islam is the problem. There's no such thing as a couple million bad apples. If Islam were a drug in America, it would have been a pretty fucking long time ago. Don't you think so? Ephedra killed a dozen people. Islam killed over 3000. Isn't that interesting? Maybe they will open up their eyes and see what's in front of them before we're attacked here again. Although, I suspect we'll have to be bombed a few times before the thought enters their tiny brains. I'm just glad I live in a rural ass small town. I feel bad for your city guys and girls.

Am I calling for the ban of Islam? No. What I am calling for is our heads up their ass. I want 24 hour monitoring of every mosque. I want them pressured to condemn every single attack. I want them speaking out. I want them turning hateful Muslims. If they can't do it, then practice your religion in a communist nation. Not a free nation. A free nation and Islam just aren't compatible. Like the dog with rabies, and the man who gets bit. We don't necessarily have to kill all the dogs to insure rabies will disappear if we can find a cure for rabies. If we can't, then we'll just have to kill all the dogs. There is no cure other than euthanization. I don't want rabies.

Finally, She Is Mine

I got a new car. I've been trying to get this car for two years. In fact, on October 31st, 2003, I posted about how much I wanted this car way back then, and I finally got it. I don't even know how. I'm 19 with no credit. I just got really lucky, and have a very good cosigner. So that's good. I'm very lucky.

It was a little over $16,000 after tax tag and title. So that's pretty good. I added on an extended warranty, because I'm pretty good at wearing cars out. It's cool though. This is pretty much my dream car, so I'm very happy to have it. It's so fast... A lot faster than my Talon, and I thought my Talon was fast. My Tiburon kills the Talon. It already has an exhaust system on it, as well as a cold air intake. Not a bad deal at all.

I'll be going on vacation on Sunday. I'm going to Disney World and I'll be gone from the 24-27. I'll be posting a lot of pictures and stuff from my cell phone, so expect the site to have somewhat of an awkward format going for a few days. I figure it's better to post neat pictures with a few words rather than nothing at all. So it'll be alright.

So with all of that said, I have been extremely busy with the car buying and the vacation preperations. I can't wait until I get home tonight. I really want to talk about round 2 of the London terrorism, as well as the guy who got shot in the subway over there today. Until then, I'm off to go make money.

Me In 6 Years

Well, I figure that at the rate I'm being fucked with by police and being outraged by organized religion, I may one day go absolutely apeshit and do something like this.

From Queens, NY comes a pretty good story that combines a lot of elements of discussion here at TheSick.net. A psychotic madman by the name of "Davy" went apeshit when he went on a rampage at a church. Wielding a shotgun and a sword, Davy, 25, left his house at 1:30 am carrying his sword. He arrived at the church and started hacking the arms off a 107 year old statue of the Virgin Mary and her Mom, St. Anne. He hacked Mary's Mom's arms off.

He wasn't finished though. At some point during this psychotic rage, he realized that the sword just wasn't cutting it it. In retrospect, it was probably a poor choice of a tool to complete the task at hand. So he went home and got a shotgun. He then put a buckshot right into Mary's Mom's fucking head, "blowing St. Anne's head into nearby bushes", the police say. In the middle of all of this, the article quotes Davy as saying "I'm a hustler! I'm a warrior!"

Then the cops pull up. They see this fucking guy with his shotgun and his sword, and they don't know what the fuck to do. He's in a psychotic rage. He then declares "I'm warning you motherfuckers", turns around and walks towards the cops and starts shooting his pump-action shotgun. He hit one officer in the head and one in the leg. The one who got shot in the leg took Davy down.

All three people involved are still alive, even the guy who got shot in the head. But here's the kicker. The article goes on to say: "Davy, who was in critical but stable condition at Mary Immaculate Hospital, suffers from bipolar disorder and apparently nursed a potent hatred for Christianity, the police and other institutions, officials and relatives said."

HAH! I wrote the headline before I even read that little tidbit. OK, let's review. I don't like police officers who violate my constitutional rights. I really don't like religion. AND I'm bipolar. Me in 6 years?

Davy's Momma, Miss Davy, went on to say "He's a good kid with a mental problem." Really, Miss Davy? You don't say? What a stunning exhibition of your sterling intellect. I am not surprised you popped this kid out. Maybe this is what happens when people are pushed to the absolute brink of insanity by religious fanatics and flagrant constitution raping police officers. Add in the predisposition of bipolar disorder, and you have a recipe for disaster.

Now, this story really makes me think. I wonder what makes me any different than this guy. I don't know his background, but I know the basics and he has all of the elements that I have. So I have to wonder... Is there an event that can occur that would make me think that it is a good idea to go on a rampage with a sword and a shotgun, and launch a full out assault on a Church?... I really don't think so.

I've been thinking about this deeply. I personally don't understand why anyone would knowingly commit a serious crime. I just don't get it. I mean, that notion alone is insane to me. Why would anyone steal something knowing the risk of the consequences would greatly out-weigh any personal gain. The same can be said about any crime. Drug dealing, car stealing, cop killing, etc. I just don't know how any sane person would risk their freedom for anything. If someone told me that they would give me a million dollars to go and steal some car, I'd say go fuck yourself. I just don't understand how any sane person would do anything to risk imprisonment.

So that's what separates me and this fellow. I love freedom way too much to ever do anything like that. I'll do my bad deeds verbally rather than with a sword and a shotgun. And I'll end this with a quote from the pastor of the Church he assaulted.

"It's just sad... He has a psychological problem with religion." Teehee.

Who? John Roberts

I listened to Bush's speech tonight on XM while I was working, and I must say that I wasn't too impressed by him or his Supreme Court nominee, John Roberts.

Bush is a terrible speaker. I also don't understand why he felt the need to address the nation in prime time. All for a Supreme Court nominee? Seems like a bitch much. I think he felt the need to magnify the importance of it. More than likely, because of the Karl Rove story. It's a fake story, not even a real one. But the media will attack anything relating to Bush. That's good entertainment.

The best part was at the end when Bush says "Good Job, Robert", and they sort of both give each other a look like "What now?". Then they start walking, then stop quickly because they realize they left Roberts' wife standing on the side of the podium! So then Bush says "Josie?" And she scurries in the middle of them, walking down the hall. But she left the two kids standing there! She just walked away, after all that, leaving the two children wondering what the fuck is going on. I found it hilarious. Anyways...

As far as I can tell, John Robert is a good pick. I've read some things that worry me, but overall I think he is a fine choice. This guy doesn't have a sterling resume. However, he seems to be the brightest star in the sky when it comes to potential judges. I would also like to clearly state that the article I am using for this post, as well as to form all of my opinions come from Law.com. A non-partisan website, that is simply about all things legal. This article was also written in February. This completely insures that I'm not getting any bias, and that I can fully form my opinion without anyone fucking with it. I hope you all will use this article to form your opinion as well. Stay away from the media reports.

If you were to read this ABC News article, you would be subjecting yourself to a completely slanted point of view. Fuck that. Lets say / this is slanted. This article is this: __ . Seriously. It's pretty pathetic, and ridiculous. Stay away from shit like that, because everyone with the power to publish an article is going to try and stir up shit, and it's important for the public to be properly informed.

First off, let's look at his credentials. Harvard Graduate, Rehnquist law clerk, Deputy Solicitor General, top-flight practitioner at Hogan & Hartson, and as many articles have stated, including the one I cite, the finest oral advocate before the high court in the last decade. I think it's pretty much unanimous, this guy's a fucking genius. Everyone from the President to some highly bias and smearing articles are calling this guy smart. And if the elite media calls someone smart, you'd better believe they're a fucking genius. And this is why I think he's great. Because he has well above average intelligence, and I think that is just what we need in the Supreme Court. Geniuses. I don't care what their politics are.

Check this out though. I find this very interesting, and I bet you will too. This article quotes an anonymous source who is a fellow judge on the D.C. circuit as saying this: "He's a great judge here, but I think we're going to lose him to the Supreme Court". Very interesting, right? This article is 5 months old. I also find it very interesting that John Roberts had a very well prepared speech. The news reports say that George Bush called Roberts around noon today. Very strange. There could be some hidden things here. But to give the benefit of the doubt, I will point out that it's said that he is "the finest oral advocate". So maybe that's why he spoke so well. I don't think so, though.

George HW Bush actually nominated Roberts back in 1992 at the end of his presidency. The Senate ignored the nomination, and waited for Clinton to take office and then he made a new nomination. I find this very strange considering the fact that he hadn't served at a judge at all at the time of his nomination. Very weird. At the time, he was in the Office of the Solicitor General. I don't even know what that is, nor do I care. There are many, many weird occurrences that I will point out.

So after being fucked out of his judicial nomination, he returned to Hogan and became sort of a Supreme Court Specialist. He built a very lucrative practice arguing before the Supreme Court. He argued 39 cases before the Court and won 25 of them. That's pretty goddamn good. But now we hit another very awkward bump in the road.

According to his 2003 financial disclosure forms, Hogan paid Roberts just over 1,000,000. A million. When he dropped down to be a Judge on the D.C. Court of Appeals, his pay was lowered to $171,800. What the fuck? Why would any sane individual do this? I just don't get it. I mean, I understand the prestige in serving on the bench, but is it really worth a million a year salary? I doubt it... Which opens up the door for a lot of serious speculation.

However, the article takes a scary turn. "Yet those who know Roberts say he, unlike Souter, is a reliable conservative who can be counted on to undermine if not immediately overturn liberal landmarks like abortion rights and affirmative action." I really hope this isn't true, and I don't believe it is. The article goes on to quote a friend who clerked with Roberts in 1980 as saying "He is as conservative as you can get." I'm still not worried.

In this fair and accurate Wikipedia entry, Roberts is quoted as saying "Roe v. Wade is the settled law of the land...There is nothing in my personal views that would prevent me from fully and faithfully applying that precedent." This is very important. This is all he has to say for me to approve. For those who don't know, Roe Vs Wade was the landmark case heard by the Supreme Court in 1971 that basically makes the restriction of abortion unconstitutional.

Alright, so now I've established this guy's character and background, I'm just going to skip all the other shit I have about his character and go straight to one of the cases he ruled on. These are very important also. He's talked the talk, and its essential to see if he walks the walk.

"In the unanimous ruling last October in Hedgepeth v. WMATA, Roberts upheld the arrest, handcuffing and detention of a 12-year-old girl for eating a single french fry inside a D.C. Metrorail station. "No one is very happy about the events that led to this litigation," Roberts acknowledged in the decision, but he ruled that nothing the police did violated the girl's Fourth Amendment or Fifth Amendment rights."

That's all you need to know. He'll uphold the law and the constitution. I don't know the background of the law the girl broke, but I assume it has something to do with eating in the subway. I say he's a good choice, and I look forward to seeing the Democrats butcher his good character.

Strip Clubs

So many good news stories today... I had 12 stories to talk about, and I narrowed it down to 8. I really need to get the Obscure Writings page up and going. Anyways, onto the story.

Another prime example of how freedom is taken away by religious nuts. The absolutely insane and evil, in my opinion, Missouri Governor Matt Blunt (haw haw) is fighting hard against strip clubs. He's pressing for more regulation. That word makes me cringe.

Last week, Mr. Blunt signed legislation that makes lap dances, full nudity, and customers younger than 21 illegal. The new legislation also states that the topless dancers must stay at least 10 feet away from the customer, and must dance behind a 2 foot high railing. Basically, they must be caged. Oh, and the stripper can't touch the customer at all.

Mr. Blunt (I can't say it with a straight face) went on to say I believe this will stifle the operation of those businesses, and I don't think it's a bad thing." Nice, douche bag. In this quote, he makes it very apparent that he has no genuine interest in community standard, which is a load of shit in and of itself anyway. He just wants to "stifle" their operation. He wants them gone. He wants to ban them, because stripping and people who go to see a woman strip is a dirty, immoral activity. Because tits are dirty. Right, Father Blunt?

The reporter goes on to ask a very good question. He asks "You don't have a problem legislating morality?" Very good question Reporter Dan! Call this fuck out on his bullshit! Father Blunt is, without a doubt, legislating his biblical morality. And what do you think he responded to this very good question with?

"I don't have a problem enforcing community standards. I don't think this is a good industry to have in Missouri. I'm confortable doing things I know and we all know stifle operations in our state." Nice going, dickhead. What makes you think you have the power or the right to impose your moral values on an entire fucking state. Governor or not, I don't a shit. Does he think he's God? Nah. He thinks he's doing God's work.

He isn't enforcing community standards. I am willing to bet that at least 30% of Missouri is pissed about this. That's my low guess. Now, let's say that 95% of Missouri wanted these strip clubs gone. I wouldn't care then. Instead, I'd be bitching about how much Missouri sucks. But if that were the case, Father Blunt would be in the right. But that isn't the case. He's only interested in "stifling the operation" of businesses that he finds morally offensive. The community doesn't care. Those girls are stripping inside. Not outside! What the fuck do you care?

I mean really, fuck it. Let's assume 95% of all Missourians want strip clubs banned, because they feel they're immoral. Well then I would say fuck them. Who gives a shit if they find it immoral? Those strippers have a right to show their titties for money and those men have a right to pay 10 bucks for a lap dance if they wish. Because this is America and we are free to spend our money and make our money any legal way possible. That is until some homosexual Governor by the name of Father Blunt decides he hates women so much that he's going to make it pretty much illegal for them to show their titties.

What I'm saying is that it does not matter if even 95% of Missouri wants the strip clubs gone. If I'm a Missouri resident, and I hate strip clubs, explain to me how I am effected in any negative way by girls showing their tits somewhere else in town. How would that effect me? What, is there some sort of massive epidemic of men walking around the streets at night masturbating? Is that the complaint? Or maybe wives are upset that husbands don't want to fuck their fat asses and instead go see some hot chicks at the titty bar. Who knows.

What I do know is that there's no reason to "stifle operations", which is a code word for "make them go out of business". It effects no one negatively. It's indoors, it's private, and it makes no difference. Fuck Father Matt Blunt. I hope Father Matt Blunt gets smacked in the fucking face with two big ass tits. The Baptist Bastard.

But there's a flip side! There's the other extreme to this type of story. Leaving the extremely conservative Midwest, we now make our way to the extremely liberal San Diego, California. The Mayor of San Diego has been convicted of accepting illegal campaign contributions. And who gave him those campaign contributions?

Strip clubs. A strip club owner contributed $34,00 to Michael Zucchet so that he could help repeal the "no touching" laws at strip clubs. He was convicted of conspiracy, extortion, and fraud. Apparently, he paid the mayor and a local city council member in cash. And the funny part is, this guy was the new mayor. The old one recently resigned due to a scandal involving San Diego's pension fund. San Diego seems to be pretty good at catching the corrupt politicians. Now the rest of America needs to follow suit and start nailing the rest of them.

But regardless, this is what happens when people impose their moral values on private strip clubs. You're just asking for corruption. But as always, people are always willing to ban freedoms that they don't like. Just as long as it's something they don't like of course. They don't understand that one of these days, something they like is going to get fucked with. I guarantee this. For every person reading this, if it hasn't already happened, it will. Something you enjoy will be banned. It's inevitable. This is how freedom dies, and this is how the slow progression works. One story at a time. One regulation at a time. It just makes me sick.

I will be censored eventually. In time, the FCC will regulate the internet. My ISP or web host might get fined because I say "Fuck." It's happening. Someone is going to cross the line one of these days. The same argument as to how the FCC can regulate radio can be made for the internet. I'm just waiting for it to happen. Maybe when our Imperial Communist Government officials go too far, the public will wake up and do something for once.

We're just inching, one story at a time, one regulation at a time, towards a full-out Communist nation.

Sex Offenders Can't Read Maxim

I'm going to, for the first time ever, defend a sex offender. First off, let's talk about sex offenders a bit. This is all from my research, and I've done a lot. There are three main types of sex offenders. There's 1) The Sex Offender By Law 2) The Sexual Assaulter 3) The Child Molester. And then there are degrees of each.

1) Sex Offender By Law
The Sex Offender By Law is your standard person under 26 who engages in consensual sex with a minor over 12. This person doesn't have some sort of sick sexual compulsion. They just lack good judgement, and make the decision to commit an illegal act by engaging in sexual contact with a person who is not of legal age to consent to that very act. An 18 year old who had sex with a 13 year old is, by law, a sex offender. This person generally isn't someone who is a threat to society. Only a threat to your daughter's innocence and emotional well being.

The Sexual Assaulter
First of all, I didn't think "assaulter" was a word, but it is so I'm using it. The Sexual Assaulter is a person who makes sexual contact with another against their will. This ranges from a simple ass grabbing to full blown rape. The threat of the this person to society is completely dependent on their crime. It could just be a guy who was trying too hard to get some booty and who was just being persistent. It could also be someone who is completely fucked up in their head, and who wants to rape women simply because of deep psychological issues. Remember, those with the deep psychologic issues, which are more often than not unfixable, are the treats to society.

The Child Molester
The Child Molester is the straight up, no good, motherfucking piece of shit who should spend every single day of their life in prison after they have been convicted. Joseph Duncan, John Couey, etc. These people have no hope of recovering. There are deep psychologic issues in play here that are simply unfixable. They have a sickness and is not curable, and it compels them to do these things. It's not a legitimate "sickness." It's just them. It happens due to traumatic and abusive childhoods. And they're as good as dead. They are a dog with rabies, breeding more people just like them with every victim they create.

So those are the three general categories. As for the first group, they probably shouldn't be labeled as sex offenders. By law, they are indeed sex offenders. But I think there needs to be some sort of ditinction between the 20 year old kid with a 14 year old girlfriend and the 40 year old man with 10 year old victims.

So with all that said, I'd like to talk about this story that comes out of Miami, Florida. Miami police are sending a type 2 sex offender to jail for violating the terms of his probation. What did he do? He had a copy of Maxim.

Andrew Calderon, 23, was jailed for 6 days before a judge let him go. According to the terms of his condition, he is not allowed to have sexually stimulating material. Calderon was convicted of "sexual battery on a disabled relative." Definitely a sick fuck, but he is still only a type 2 offender. And to deprive this guy, who is still a piece of shit, a "racy" magazine is just fucking stupid and wrong. I will prove their idiocy later.

We move on to the second person mentioned in this article, Joseph Conte. His crime was not mentioned, but he is a sex offender. HE was arrested after his parole officer found a sex manual in his drawer next to the bed he shares with his wife. Again, I must say "What the fuck?" He's not allowed to view racy material, yet he's allowed to fuck his wife? Where is the consistency and logic in that?

Both of these guys are clearly pieces of shit. But they certainly aren't on the level of the Duncan's and Couey's. Why would you want to deprive a Sexual Assaulter of a racy maganize? The whole reason he raped someone in the first place was because he wasn't getting any action. He went nuts! And you're gonna deprive him of masturbation material? What do you think that's going to accomplish? That's probably the best way to get him to rape again. Good going, assholes.

I mean, don't get me wrong. Calderon is a pretty sick fuck. He "sexually assaulted" a retarded relative. He probably has some of those deep psychologic issues I spoke of. But he's out of jail, so obviously they felt he was at least somewhat rehabilitated. There is no point in throwing him in jail for reading Maxim. This is the best way to get someone to sexually assault again. It's exactly the same as making it part of a convicted thief's parole that he not work. If you make it illegal for a thief to work, then what will he do to get money? Gee, I think he just might steal. Let the fucking guy reading Maxim, it's not even that bad.

As for Conte, I think it's obvious. It was a fucking sex manual, in a drawer, next to the bed that he shares with his wife. What do you think he's using that for? Now, if this guy is a type 3 offender, then I would say good. I would say they should use that violation of parole to put his stupid fucking sick ass back in jail. The article doesn't state his crime though. I'm guessing that if he as a wife, he probably isn't a type 3.

I never thought I'd be defending a sex offender, but this shit is just fucking stupid. When I see Florida Authorities, my state, doing things that are completely counterproductive to their cause, I get pissed. You don't deny a (piece of shit) sexual assaulter the right to read a racy, non-pornographic magazine. And you just don't deny a (piece of shit) sex offender the right to read a book that will allow him to better please his wife. Yet, a small part of me still feels like they both deserve to be fucked with. But in the end, I just think that they're making things worse. Find a different way to fuck with them, but don't abuse your power.

Juror Consults Bible, Murdering Rapist Lives

Weekends are always terrible news days. So today, I found a mediocre story that I want to talk about.

It comes from Colorado. Back in 1994, over 11 years ago, some fuck-ass by the name of Robert Harlan decided it was a good idea to rape a woman, Rhonda Maloney, at gunpoint. While he was raping her on the side of the road or something, a passer-by, by the name of Jaquie Creazzo stopped to see what the fuck was going on. She was shot twice.

A week later, they found Rhonda's body. Jaquie did not die, but it still paralyzed from the waist down today. Robert Harlan was convicted, and sentenced to die. So what's the problem?

Well, the death sentence was overturned by a few Judges who doesn't deserve to be mentioned in my blog. Why was it overturned? Because the fucking idiot motherfucking jurors decided it was a good idea to consult the Bible during deliberations. Nice going, assholes. That shows superb decision making skills. What an excellent choice you made!

The whole of them are assholes. The Colorado high court majority (assholes) said that the jurors could be influenced by biblical passages. What the fuck? How? This is just stupid. What if they didn't consult a bible? Who's to say that didn't already have stupid fucking biblical references in their head? Who's to say that everyone who thinks someone needs to die because of what they did doesn't have a biblical reference in their head? Shit, I would piss on the Bible at the very first chance but I guarantee that wherever I got the idea that it was good and right to kill people for committing horrible crimes, it probably traces back to the Bible. Of course, the Judges (or maybe just the article) made no mention of the fact that the jurors violated Harlan's constitutional right to be judged by a jury of his peers. Judge Sick, presiding.

And the jurors... What the fuck is wrong with them? First of all, how did they even smuggle a bible in there? Because the article clearly states that they didn't consult the Bible, but a Bible. Secondly, and more importantly, who the fuck do they think they are to deliberately and purposely go against the rules of the Court? Who are they to undermine our system? You can't consult anything but evidence and testimony. I just can't understand the nerve of these people.

Juror/Sheep Lana Ochoa said she had no regrets about the jury's actions. What a stupid bitch. Putting the Bible over our system of justice. Who the fuck does she think she is? Christ? She went on to say "I still stand firm that whatever happens to him is God's will." No. You stupid bitch. It was supposed to be your fucking will. Not God's. The collective will of you and your peers. Can these stupid fucking sheep not handle an ounce of responsibility without the guidance of the 2000 year old book? Apparently not.

So because of their actions, Robert Harlan, murderer and rapist, is still alive and enjoying life. Good going assholes. The state prosecutors are pushing the Supreme Court to overturn the state court's ruling. That's no good either. Because if they succeed, then juries will be allowed to consult the Bible during sentencing, and I think that can be potentially dangerous considering it's a 2000 year old book. I know if I every got in any trouble, I wouldn't want anyone judging me by the Bible. Because then, in essence, you're being judged by God and not a jury of your peers which is unconstitutional. So, even though it pisses me off, the high court was right in their decision. It's really terrible, but blame the stupid fucking jurors. They're the one's who did it. It will never be overturned because those jurors violated the murdering rapist's constitutional right to be judged by a jury of his peers, and not God. Nice one. I'm sure they won't lose a minute of sleep over it anyways. It's just God's will.

God Fucks With Family Reunion

From Sugarcreek, Pennsylvania comes the most hilarious story I have read in many days.

A fucking lightning bolt struck a tree at a family reunion. It critically injured a 12 year old boy, knocking him unconscious, and also sent a full dozen people to the hospital. Wow! Talk about ironic. Wanna knock the punch line?

It happened when they were on their knees praying!

Yes, the article quotes one of the guests as saying "A lot of us were on our knees, praying." That's just too funny. I mean, of course it sucks that the 12 year old is in the hospital. But excluding that, I find it absolutely fucking hilarious that a dozen people had to goto the hospital because they were struck by lightning while they were praying? What kind of sick God would do this?

Larry Bell, who was also a guest said "God was showing his strength." What the fuck? God was showing his strength to the people who were on their knees worshipping him by... trying to kill them? What the fuck kind of logic is that? I can see if this happened during some sort of Satanic ritual. But come on, they were praying! I'd suspect that Mr. Larry Bell is absolutely insane.

But before that, he said They say lightning is rare, but this is very rare for lightning to come down on so many people and not kill anybody." Hilarious. So what is it? Did God show his strength by shooting down lightning, or did he show his strength by not letting everyone die? If that was the case, then why did he allow the boy to be critically injured? And what if we didn't have modern day medical treatment? Would everyone still live? This is all very confusing. Why do people always have to bring God into things and complicate them? They do this all the time. I just don't know what this guy means, but I'm going to assume he meant God was showing his strength by throwing lightning. The other instance just has no logic at all... Which is a good indicator that he actually did indeed mean it that way. It's a mystery. Just a funny little story I wanted to point out. The best part was they actually blamed it on God! (Maybe)

Duncan Update and Site Update

This is 'sort of' a TheSick.net exclusive. I have tried for the past hour to find this story, but I cannot. Geraldo reported on his Saturday show "At Large" that the Spokane Weekly newspaper is reporting that police found a camcorder in his stolen vehicle. On the tapes, it showed all of the worst possible shit you can imagine, including the murder of Dylan. Now, this isn't been reported officially yet in an official news manner, but I expect it will soon. When it's picked up nationally, I will go absolutely fucking apeshit on this blog. But I'll wait before I get myself all worked up.

Another interesting thing I saw on Geraldo's show was a video Duncan made. He made some goofy ass video, trying to seem like a deep intellectual madman. But the video is do the music of Disturbed's "Down With The Sickness", which is a song I happen to like very much. It pisses me off. I expect Disturbed to be bombarded with hate mail now. That's just terrible. It's really weird for me. I mean, I love a band very much, a band I met a few years ago and a band I really love. And Duncan listened to the same shit. Fucking weird...(Picture of me and David Draiman here. 2 year old picture, before I had my pimp ass beard and wore the talon labret stud like he does.)

Like I said, I searched everywhere on Google for a website for this "Spokane Weekly" newspaper, but I couldn't find a damn thing at all. It could be a small local newspaper with a really good source. So you might want to take this information with a grain of salt, but regardless of Geraldo's past, I think he's got a nose for sensing credible sources. I suggest everyone check out Geraldo's show tomorrow night to see more of the details of this stuff. Hopefully, one of the major news sites will pick this stuff up so I can talk about it more.

I did a lot of work on the site today. I added a navigation bar. For those new to the site, I've always had really cool navigation bars that lead to all sorts of information about me and stuff I've made. One cool feature I'm adding to the site the "Obscure Writings" page. That's not it's official name. I haven't decided yet. But, the whole point of the obscure writings page is to allow me to provide short interesting posts that aren't full out assaults, or well thought out important posts. It's just a way to maintain balance. I don't want to damage the integrity of the main blog. This is my baby. The obscure writings will be more of my fuck around page. Like I said, it's just a way to write more without messing up the integrity, which has been a big problem I've been having since I've gotten this big boost in readers. I just don't want to turn anyone off with a story that might not be too appealing, but it could be something I want to at least point out and make a few comments on.

So I'll get that mini-blog set up soon. I'm also compiling my best of posts. If you have any personal favorites, send them along. I'll share a really old post that isn't my favorite, but it's one I find extremely funny.

Back when we didn't have a title field on Blogger, on February 6th, 2003, I wrote this:
"Blogging is kinda gay. I think I'm gonna stop soon."

And that's all I wrote. Pretty funny to see that I'm still doing it and I'm still loving it. Even funnier to see I thought it was gay at some point. Who'da thunk it?

Well I just wanted to give those few updates. I need to go find a real story to talk about now. Then I need to respond to a few comments and goto bed. It's 2 AM now and I have to be up at 10 AM to go see Charlie and The Chocolate Factory. I loved that movie so much, and I loved the book even more.

Christians Restrict Catholics From Adoption

A Christian adoption agency is turning away Roman Catholics. Their official reasons is that the religion conflicts with their "Statement of Faith." Right. The twist in this story is that this agency receives money from the "choose life" license plates. Wait, what? A christian organization is receiving money from the state? Well, putting that whole constitution thing and that whole ethics thing aside, I'm going to take an interesting stance on this.

Fuck them both. They're both assholes. First of all, I have a problem with a Christian adoption agency. Who are they to impose their religious beliefs on anyone who wants to adopt a baby? Who the fuck are they to discriminate? There should be very few prerequisites to adoption. A nuclear family, both parents having a good job, no criminal history, etc. Why would they want to make it extremely difficult for children to be adopted?

This is a prime example of how Religion is incompatible with society. This agency, which is called Bethany, has 75 adoption offices in 30 states. These are the same people who scream "Choose Life" at everyone. So my question is: Who the fuck are they to on one hand, scream "choose life", and on the other say "After you choose life, we'll make sure your son or daughter "chooses Christ." Clever, huh? It's true, though.

These Bethany scumbags have the nerve to actually turn down a perfectly suitable applicant simply because they disagree with their official statement of faith? That's bullshit. It's a euphemism. Their real policy is this: If you do not agree with them on Christ and the Bible, you are not allowed to raise a child they control. Who the fuck are they? And they have the balls to accept tax payer money? It makes me sick. This is what pisses people off about Christian organizations and leaders the most. The hypocrisy. They're talking out of both sides of their face.

As for the Catholics... Well, you guys aren't getting off easy either. Obviously, I have to at least lean towards your side, seeing as these Bethany assholes are complete hypocrites, and would deny me the right to adopt a child if I wanted to. However, I don't understand why the Catholics just don't lie. Who cares? What's wrong about lying so you can do a good thing? Nothing is. Maybe if the average Catholic wasn't so interested in corporal punishment (beating the shit out of your child as punishment), and extremely awkward religious ceremonies, you wouldn't be getting fucked with. What can I say? Wake up and realize that Bethany is a hypocritical organization, and find yourself a real adoption agency and stop bitching.

And how much money did Bethany receive from the state of Mississippi? $7,053 of the $244,000 in Choose Life tag sales. Real fucking nice. This story contains so much idiocy, corruption, hypocrisy, and utter bullshit that my head is about to explode. It pisses me off so much because the people who are really being fucked with are innocent orphan children who are being denied a Mommy and Daddy because of religion. Because the Catholics are too strict. Because Bethany is too hateful of anyone who doesn't see things exactly their way. All at the expensive of innocent orphan children. The Christians AND the Catholics are both assholes precisely because of this. Just another coin in the hat that goes to show religion does more harm than good.

If they would have put this simple fucking warning label on the Bible, none of this shit, along with plenty of other horrible shit would have never happened. (Thanks Kathyrn)

Hildabitch Panders To Soccer Moms

Hillary Clinton, or The Hildabitch as I like to call her, has become a conservative overnight it seems. She is now targeting Rockstar Games' Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. She is calling for a federal investigation. She called it a "silent epidemic. The other New York senator is also weighing in, saying that it's time for the federal government to step in.

I love exposing liars. And yes, exaggerating is lying. First off, let's look at the definition of the word "epidemic".

EP·I·DEM·IC: Spreading rapidly and extensively by infection and affecting many individuals in an area or a population at the same time: an epidemic outbreak of influenza. Widely prevalent: epidemic discontent.

Interesting. Please remember this lie in 2008. First of all, a video game can't possibly spread rapidly through infection. It's just not physically possible. Secondly, if she was using it as more of a metaphor, then she would be making the claim that Grand Theft Auto is causing massive horrible effects, on the scale of a fatal disease, and is rapidly effect America. Come on now. Who the fuck is Hildabitch fooling? She's reaching out to conservative America at the expense of my entertainment. Democrats are generally younger. Younger people generally like Grand Theft Auto. Why is this unloyal dyke going betray her base and go towards conservative America? That's not only politically asinine, but just really dishonest.

Here's a good point, that Hildabitch needs to consider. Straight out of Logic Land comes this point. How many kids, whom you wish to protect apparently, actually have 50 bucks to buy this game? Hm? I know I never had 50 bucks to buy any game on my own when I was at an age where such content, as is shown in GTA may be inappropriate. Hell, I didn't even have a way to get to a store to buy a game at an age where GTA's content would could turn me into a prostitute fucking murderer.

The word "parent" comes out of Hildabitch's mouth only once, when she says "There is no doubting the fact that the widespread availability of sexually explicit and graphically violent video games makes the challenge of parenting much harder." If you could have only seen the look on my face when I read that statement. That is just such an asinine statement. There is no doubting that the widespread availability of GTA makes the challenge of parenting much harder? You know, that's so stupid I almost don't know what to say.

Keyword: Almost. There is a lot of doubting that it makes things any harder. Here's what you do. You don't let him play it. How hard is that? If he somehow manages to get it by trade or theft, then you break the CD in half. What's so hard about that? My only question is how can the availability of sexually explicit video games make parenting harder? Parenting never was, and never is easy. What a bitch. She's pandering to the right. Soccer Mom's every rejoice!

I'm just tired of this. I'm tired of the Imperial Government always screwing with the aspects of life that I enjoy. The Internet will be regulated one day. My favorite radio host was kicked off the air because of the Imperial Government. That's something that bothers me every time I feel like listening to the radio at 6 am. Which is often. I'm not allowed by law to put neons under my car. I'm not allowed to have window tint. I'm not allowed to have a more efficient aftermarket exhaust system. I am basically forced to spend $12.95 a month on XM radio so I can hear the music I want to hear unedited. Because God forbid artistic expression be allowed on the radio. I'm not allowed to have a TV in my car, for the passenger, that is visible by me in the driver's seat. If a person can hear music coming from my car anymore than 25 feet away, I'm breaking the law. I am forced to wear my seat belt. Sure, I think its a good idea but I'm still forced. I'm just so fucking tired of Imperial Government telling me what I can and can't do with my property. I'm tired of the massive amounts of controls and regulations. I'm just fed up.

It seems I'm just the type of person who's interests are constantly being fucked with by the government. My interest in Car modifications, my interest in listening to hilarious talk show hosts, my interest in playing violent video games, my interest in angry passionate music, etc. Maybe I should become a senator so I can start banning things I don't like.

The New York Yankees, banned. Their fans, criminals. The Learning Channel, banned. It's viewers? Death penalty. Islam, banned. Its practitioners, deported. MTV, banned. Rednecks, executed. Mustangs, banned. Hollywood, destroyed. Feminists, imprisoned. Bras, banned. Underwear, banned. Thongs, mandatory. The New York Times, banned. John Ashcroft, imprisoned. Al Franken, imprisoned. 3 Doors Down, banned. Rap, banned until the end of all time.

Like I said, I'm just tired of this. It just seems everything I like gets fucked with by the Government, and I'm tired of it. I just really want America to be the Free Country that I learned about in school. Maybe one day, a president will be elected who will clean everything up. Maybe one day, we can actually be free to make our own choices. Maybe just one constitutional amendment will be passed that will change it all. And that is this: No crime shall be made out of an act that does not violate through force or fraud, a person's right to life, liberty, or property. When that constitutional amendment comes around, then we will be free. And when it does, then you increase all the penalties on the real crimes. Then, we will live in a truly free and safe nation.

What Happens When You Prank a Lazy Bitch

A hip-hop radio station in California ran a little contest. The contest was "Win a Hummer". Strangely enough, the contest ended on April 1st, 2005. This lady played along in the contest for a week. Apparently, they had to track the amount of miles two different Hummers drove around town. Something stupid like that. And this chick had the time to do this, probably because she doesn't have a job. But she has kids! I'll get to that in a second.

So at the end of the contest, there were two winners. On April 1st, they went to the radio station to be presented with their prize. They were each presented with a Hummer remote controlled car. HAW HAW. Pretty funny, huh? Well, as you can see above, the black woman was pretty amused with the whole thing. The big fat manly looking bitch, with the middle finger proudly displayed towards the camera man, was not amused.

So what do you do when you've been the victim of an April Fool's day prank? That's right, its the lazy no-good gimme generation way! That's right, you sue. Shannon Castillo, professional fat lazy bitch, has filed a lawsuit in California federal court for $60,000. That's "about" the price of a brand new Hummer.

My first question is what are her damages? What did she lose? Well on the morning of April 1st, when she went to pick up her Hummer, she hired a babysitter. Apparently, she had to wait 2 hours to receive her awesome remote control car. So let's just say she had to pay the babysitter for 3 hours of work. Even at minimum wage, which babysitters never make, that's around $20 bucks. Hardly cause to file a lawsuit. So why is she suing? Why isn't the black woman who was also duped suing?

That's because, as the article cites, Shannon Castillo is a "housewife". That is a euphemism. What she really does is nothing. She's fat, she's lazy, she wants everything to be handed to her, she probably receives government assistance, and she looks like a fucking man. That her profession. Professional lazy bitch, coming straight out of Generation Gimme. She's too poor to afford a decent car, so she wants someone to give her one. As if she could even afford the gas it consumes.

The price of a brand new fully loaded 2004 Hummer H2 is $57,520. And she actually believed a radio station was giving two of them away? A hip-hop station at that? That's her real problem. She spends all her time at home with her two children listening to rap all day, and it has eroded her brain to the intelligence level of a 9 year old. But of course, she's still pissed.

So what does the scumbag lawyer have to say? Prepare for idiocy. "Any time you conduct a contest you have to be brutally honest about how you're conducting the contest and what you're giving away." Oh really? Mr. Legal Man, says who? What law did this radio station break? He goes on to say "The station's misrepresentation of the prizes being offered violated state law and Federal Communications Commission regulations." Oh really?

The contest was simply entitled "Win a Hummer". They never claimed it was a Hummer H2, or any vehicle for that matter. They could have given away a blowjob, and they would be within the law. I'm sure it's legal to give a blowjob as a prize in California. His only proof against the radio station to prove that they actually misrepresented what they were giving away is that, as he claims, the radio station "indicated" the Hummer had 22 inch rooms, suggesting it was a full-sized vehicle. And that's all he's got. Come the fuck on now. And if the radio station did indeed violate FCC rules, then their beef is with the FCC. Not some scumbag blood sniffing shark lawyer.

There's a reason this story is even printed, and it's because the general public finds it hilarious. It's reality comedy. Everyone loves to laugh and say "HAHA WHAT A STUPID BITCH SHE FELL FOR IT. AND SHE LOOKS LIKE A MAN TOO." Even the black chick up there has a sense of humor. But the man-bitch apparently really wanted a Hummer. A Hummer that she could never possibly afford to maintain. It gets 9 miles to the gallon, city. As if she could afford that? She couldn't even afford the taxes she would have to pay on the Hummer if she actually did receive a brand new, fully-loaded H2. It's all about a stupid Gimme Generation bitch who wants everything in her life handed to her. She's mad that she was "humiliated" and that she didn't get what her stupid brain thought she was going to get. In all reality, she humiliated herself. And that's why the black chick is laughing. She knows it, and she's laughing at herself. Positive reaction. This man-bitch is angry, and even though she decided not to devour the radio hosts who tricked her stupid ass, she's still suing. Because she's angry.

One last bit of commentary. I'm looking at this... "woman", and all these really serious questions enter my mind. She's married with two children. First of all, who in the fuck would marry that man-beast? And secondly, and more importantly, who while maintaining a level of sanity and heterosexuality would actually fuck that thing not once, but twice. I just can't believe it. It's an anomaly to me. Oh well, there's only one possible explanation. She has an obese closest-gay husband. He has sex with her and is married to her so he can pretend she's a dude when he has sex with her, and no one has to know he's gay! It's works out perfect for him. See, if you think deeply enough, you can solve any mystery. I done good.

People Were Defending This Fuck

Oh man... I just came across a horrible article from Court TV. Now, as some people may have wondered, I have been suspiciously silent about Joseph Duncan and all the happenings since he was apprehended. I mean, it was my comments on his blog that brought many of you here. But I haven't talked about it because I didn't want to talk about every single development when they slowly come out. I waited for them to pile up, and there is now a massive pile of psychotic and masochistic behavior that I can talk about.

This article is going to be my guiding star, so if you wonder about any of the information I speak of, just read it. I'll start from the top.

First off, he bragged to Shasta often and told her all about how he murdered her Mom, her mom's boyfriend, and her 13 year old brother. He told her all about how he smashed them all in the skull with a hammer. First off, can you imagine getting smashed in the skull with a fucking hammer? Can you imagine that torture? Can you imagine listening to a man tell you all about how he killed your Mom? And people were defending this fuck.

He told her all about how he staked out her house for a few days. He told her that she saw her and her brother playing outside in their bathing suits, and at that point he chose them to be his victims. If you read his blog, you will know that he was looking to get even. For what, I'm not quite sure. But he was looking for victims. And he told Shasta all about it. He probably loved every second of telling her about it. He probably got off on her tears too. And people were defending this fuck.

The article goes on to say that the beginning of Shasta's life ruining events began when she heard her mother call her into the living room on May 16th. That was 3 days after his last posting, when he was already a fugitive. At this time, Christian Cocksuckers on his blog were giving him comments of support. They were giving him hope. So, Shasta come into the living room, and she saw her mother, her brother Slade, and her mother's boyfriend tied up with zip-ties and duct tape. I would imagine the boyfriend would fight, but then I remembered that he was wielding a shotgun and a hammer. So this probably explains the lack of resistance. And people were defending this fuck.

But it gets better. You see, then Duncan zip-tied and duct taped Shasta and Dylan left them outside near a swing set. A little bit later, Shasta hears McKenzine, who is the mother's boyfriend, yell out something several times. Probably something along the lines of "You psychotic piece of shit, if you untie me I will skull fuck your head into oblivion." Moments later, she saw her 13 year old brother Slade exit the house, staggering, incoherent, and bleeding profusely from his skull. This was Duncan's handy work. He apparently needed a hammer to take out a 13 year old, because he's such a bitch. My guess is he smashed a 13 year old in the skull when he was still zip-tied, and then let him go to watch the effect of his masochism. This is how the psychotic torture loving mind works. He wanted to see his results in action. Dylan and Shasta screamed to Slade, pleading for help. He was unable to respond. He had a massive head injury, and was unable to respond. And people were defending this fuck.

Shasta recalled that he was wearing dark gloves and had a shotgun. She also noted that he had a pair of night-vision goggles that he more than likely used to spy on the family at night when he was casing them. He carefully planned his atrocity. He then spent the next six weeks raping Shasta, and for an unknown amount of time, raping Dylan as well. This scenario gives lots of room to speculate on what else he did that hasn't been released. I can't even speculate on what else he did, because the mere thought of them makes me want to vomit all over my keyboard. You can use your own imagination, and if you think it happened, it probably did. All of this is unimaginable, but it all happened. And people were defending this fuck.

So here we are now. He raped a fucking 14 year old when he was only 16 at gunpoint. I mean, if that isn't a sure sign that this guy is fucked up for life, then I don't know what else is. Somehow, he was let out back into our normal society. Then he was arrested and charged with the molestation of a 6 year old boy. His bail was set at $15,000. He or someone else paid 10% of that, which is $1,500 and he was back into society. He then absconded, and fled Minnesota. He winded up in Idaho where he killed 4 people, brutally raped an 8 year-old girl for 6 weeks, when his fucking stupid ass finally got caught at a Denny's. And people were defending this fuck.

That's fucking right. People were defending him. Christians were giving him their support and prayers. Christians were giving him encouragement and support as he was psychotically ranting about "getting even." I was assaulted by Christians who were posting on my website due to my inflammatory comments towards the ones aiding and abetting this psychotic masochist. And of course, I was painted as a bad guy for it. I was told I was just as bad as him. I was told he needed to be forgiven. I was told it's not his fault, he has a disease. I was told that he shall find salvation in Christ and me, the non believer is more evil in God's eyes. That insane talk is just as insane as Duncan's actions.

This is the sick fuck that did this. Just imagine you're this girl for 10 seconds, and feel the pain. It's just terrible. I wonder why he killed Dylan. Maybe he was a fighter. Maybe he was tired of being forced to do things he didn't want to do. Maybe he said the wrong thing. Or maybe he killed Dylan in front of Shasta just to get off. I wouldn't be shocked to hear it. This is the sort of speculation that just makes me sick. Everything is a possibility with this piece of shit. Nobody knows exactly what he did in those 6 weeks. No one knows the details that haven't leaked out yet. And people were defending him... People were reading his psychotic introspective blog and did nothing but offer their Christian love. It makes me fucking sick.

Holy Land

Well, isn't this nice. Has anyone ever heard of the Holy Land Experience? It's a religious theme park in Florida. Do I have a problem with it? No. Let the religious people goto their little religious theme park. I could care less... Until, they start getting special treatment.

The Holy Land Experience is in Orlando. They are in direct competition with all of Disney's parks, Islands of Adventure, Universal Studios, Sea World, and a few of the other more obscure parks. So, do you think that Holy Land would get special treatment when they're a business who is in direct competition with two major companies? Well, of course!

Judge Cynthia MacKinnon has ruled that a company by the name of Zion's Hope does not have to pay property taxes. They have been excused from paying $786,343 worth of taxes in my state. So I have a very big reason to be pissed. I pay my fucking admission fee (no pun intended), so why can't they? Just because their theme park is based on religion, they don't have to pay taxes? This is fucking stupid. This is fucking irrational, and it is completely unfair.

Disney, the champs, and my personal favorite pays millions upon millions of dollars every year. Though, it's been theorized that since they own over 50 miles of land, they are actually their own town and are able to use loopholes to save some money. But that's beside the point. Everyone else pays property taxes. Why should this business be any different? Well, let's take a look at Zion's Hope.

First of all, I think the CEO of this company is a fan of the Matrix. But let's look at the activities of this non-profit company. The article reports that this business distributes biblical cassettes, videos, books, CDs, it publishes a religious magazine that I'm sure people subscribe to, and they broadcast a syndicated radio show. This is a fucking business. And a successful one at that. And now they have a theme park, and this fucking stupid bitch Judge has the goddamn nerve to excuse this business that in reality is no different than Amheiser Busch and Disney, from paying taxes. It's just sick. All you have to do is look at the official website for Zion's Hope and you will see that they are a business. But because their business is about religion, they get all of this tax exemption? This is bullshit.

What a scam. I mean, what else do you call it? It's a straight up scam. And Florida's government is in on it, but local state government. Obviously this Judge MacKinnon is a religious nut. I don't see how anyone with an amount of common sense could possibly unfairly give a theme park the right to not pay taxes. With the new legislation coming in this year, they would have had to pay over a million dollars. That's a million dollars in my state. But she wants to use her bench to promote religion. Could it be more obvious? It just makes me sick.

The content of a theme park is irrelevant. I don't care if it's a theme park that centers around Marvel Comics or a theme park that centers around serial killers. People who own land, and who use that land to live on or who use it as a place of business must pay property taxes. Just because this theme park that charges a $30 admission price is based around Christianity does not give it the same status as a church. Only in the eyes of an insane bitch Judge who wants to use her bench to promote her own ideas. It just makes me sick. This is why I have such a problem with religion.

Zion's Hope is a business. I don't care what your religion or belief is. All you need to do is goto their website and realize they are a business who sells all things religious. The same as Disney sells all things family. The content makes no difference. Their product makes no difference. It's a business, and they are able to unfairly save millions of dollars because their content is Christ? Where the fuck is the logic in that?

I know the answer. And the answer is that there is no logic that. It's unfair treatment and advantage to businesses that promote religion. And there is something very wrong with that. If this was an Islamic theme park, I guarentee they would not receive the same advantages. But it's Zion's Hope. And obviously, they are a very profitable business in the Christ industry. If I were religious, I'd be pissed that people were making so much money off of the death of my savior.

But it's ok. I'm not going to worry. Because every day I'm learning that the more bullshit people cause, the more they get in the end. And I wouldn't be surprised at this point if lightning were to strike Holy Land and the whole fucking place burned down over night. I would not be surprised. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if some enraged taxpayer set fire to this place. Oh man, I have such a good idea. I should go there with a video camera... Oh the fun I would have. Oh my god. That would be the funniest thing I could possibly do. I just might do this. Not burn it down. I mean, I am an enraged tax payer but I'm not an arsonist. I do think it would be absolutely hilarious to go there, with a video camera and a friend to document what I see and to maybe get into a view debates. And in the end, I could start a fight and coax some religious nut into hitting me in the face. Oh, that would be good. I'm going to do this one of these days.

Kirsty Alley Is a Stupid Bitch

Kirsty Alley and John Travolta's stupid wife Kelly Preson are officially embarking on a public crusade. So what is their noble cause? Anti-depressants. They are fighting a war against anti-depressants. Of all the problems in America today, they're going after pills that help people with their problems. Not just anti-depressants, but all prescription drugs that effect the mind.

So why are they doing this? Let's take a look at some of their claims. In a statement to the associated press, they said "We can no longer sit back and let the clock tick, waiting for more deaths, suicides or people driven to violent acts by psychotropic drugs." Oh really? That's pretty fucking selective of you stupid whores. What about the millions of people who have escaped depression because of these psychotropic drugs? What about the thousands of people who haven't killed themselves because of these drugs? You make no mention of those people. But wait, they're not on your stupid fucking agendas.

Now I really get the pleasure of exposing these stupid lying whores. They say: "Parents in particular have been misled about the effects of these drugs. "They are highly addictive; kids are using them more than street drugs to get high."...

BULLSHIT.

Complete bullshit. Not one word in that statement is even partially true. It is just a complete lie. I explain in depth as to why I am 100% sure she is 100% full of shit. First of all, I have been on three different anti-depressants. They didn't work for me. They didn't help me. But they didn't make me psychotic. They didn't make me violent. I already had anger problems, and the drugs had zero effect on my anger. They simply had no effect on me. I'll speak honestly.

A few months ago, I was going through a very hard time. I was prescribed Wellbutrin, the most expensive and effective anti-depressant. It did shit for me. So in a desperate attempt to feel better, I started taking two a day instead of one. I was already taking the highest dose available. Eventually, I started going to an actual Psychiatrist opposed to a fucking negligent Doctor who was giving me medicine that could have made my condition worst. I'll readdress this later, but the reason I'm even saying all this is to sort of give my credentials.

So, I know first hand that no matter how much you take, you don't get high. That is a complete lie. No matter how many anti-depressants you take, you will not get high. As for Ritalin and Adderal, yes. They are considered the poor man's coke, and they do get you high. I've never taken a drug not prescribed to be. The reason I know this is because I'm a learner, and I have read volumes of information about drug experiences. To be specific, this page. This site has volumes upon volumes of information. All you have to do is compare the amount of submitted experiences with any other common drug. Look up Paxil, Zoloft, etc. The proof is in this page, which is made up of thousands of drug experiences. People don't get high on anti-depressants, it's absurd.

How ironic. That stupid fat bitch Kirsy Alley is on TV right now for a Jenny Craig commerical. I'm completely serious. "6 weeks for $60 plus the cost of food." What a stupid fat bitch. Anyways, she's a stupid fat lying bitch at that. So why is she lying? Because she's a part of the absolutely insane cult of Scientologists. And Psychiatry and Anti-depressants is viewed by the religion of Scientology the same way homosexuals and gay sex are viewed by Christians. I hope that's clear enough for everyone to understand.

So that's her motive. She's masking her compassion for people who kill themselves because of these drugs, which does indeed happen when the patient doesn't follow the Doctor's orders and suddenly stops the drug. She has no real compassion. It's a farce. She's pretending to give a shit about people when all she is doing is pushing her Scientology agenda, and it offends me.

It offends me because I know first hand that psychotropic drugs can change a person's life for the better. And when I see people lying about things that I have a great passion for, the study of human behavior and the study of the human mind included, I get pretty pissed off. They're basically saying that things I've experienced aren't real. All in the name of their religion. And I already hate religion as it is, so as you can imagine, I'm about to burst a vein in my skull at this point.

They then the article goes on to say: "The actresses said they were taking action to raise public awareness after the FDA warned that stimulants prescribed to six million US children can cause 'hallucinations and psychotic, suicidal and violent behavior.'" Not an ounce of truth to that. Complete bullshit. The FDA never, ever, ever issued such a warning. They did warn that sudden discontinuation of anti-depressants can cause suicide. That's it. Not even Ritalin or Adderal produces hallucinogenic effects. But they will say whatever it takes to push their agenda. It makes me sick.

I hope no one buys into this. I hope mothers and wives suffering from depression don't see these women speaking about these things, and give up the idea of talking to their Doctor about depression. If they really gave a shit about anyone, they would not be fighting a war against the drugs, but launching a public service announcement campaign warning women and other people who are taking or considering the use of anti-depressants not to suddenly discontinue use. That is what causes all the problems! They would warn people who seem to have mood disorders not to ever take anti-depressants. But they would never consider doing that. Because that doesn't fit in with their religious agenda.

Best Way To Spend $95 Million

So, you're sitting there at Church and the collection plate comes to you. Oh, what do you do? When I was a churchgoer, and the little metal fucking bowl would come to me, I would just pass it right to the next person. No one ever did, or has explained to me why you put money in it. At that young age of 13-14, I just couldn't understand why you would give money to a Church.

Well, in time I came to realize. Because just like every single organization, wether it's "non profit" or not, it's a business. The Church needs your money for improvements, the Church needs your money to stay running, the Church needs your money to pay the bills, the Church needs your money to run campaign ads for all of the local Republican candidates. You get the point. What I've come to realize is that people give an amount of money that is equal to the amount of guilt they feel. And the word of God is very good at making believers feel guilty.

So the Church, especially the Catholic Church who are absolute masters at making people feel guilty and unworthy, take in billions of tax free dollars every year. And what exactly do they do with that money? Let's take a look at this story that comes straight out of Houston, Texas.

The Compaq Center is now a Church. The former home of the Houston Rockets is now the home of the Lakewood Church. This Church includes three "jumbo" screens, 16,000 seats, a new lighting system, new carpet for the entire building, a new 5 story section that can hold 5,000 children, new air conditioning unit, new heating unit, a massive stage, and waterfalls on both sides of that stage. And the price tag? $95 MILLION.

That's fucking right. Somehow, they were able to get a loan for $95 million dollars, probably paying at least 10% of that in advance. They somehow obtained the lease for the building from the city of Houston, and somehow they are able to pay their bills. How, I can't quite fathom. But they can! And this massive business entity pays no taxes. All of that 95 million will be tax free. They paid not one cent of taxes on a single purchase made for that Church.

The local news reporter asked the woman in charge the obvious question. "What do you say to some people who say you should have spent it on the poor?" She responded with "I feel like that if we don't make room for our base here -- if we can grow our base, then we can do more all over the world," Joel Osteen said. "My goal is to see this place continue to grow, to spread God's love, to spread hope and encouragement all over the world in as many platforms as we can. We're just open for new opportunities and looking for new ways to do it."

Nice fucking way to dodge the question, bitch. Why not use it for the poor? Why not give it to your own churchgoers who may be having financial difficulty? Maybe they could use an interest free loan to pay some bills. Maybe one of their children are sick. I mean, the old place held only 8,000 members. So I'm sure one of those 8,000 loyal churchgoers could have used a little bit of that money. Or maybe you could have done something for your community? Maybe they could have actually done something Christ would do with that massive amount of money. But no. Jumbo screens, waterfalls, and new carpet is much more important than actually doing a Chris-like deed.

What a fucking waste. This isn't a Church. This is a performance. This is nothing more than a show. It's a shit load of hypocrisy. It's a big entertaining show, that will collect absolutely massive amounts of money in the collection pool, because at this level, you will indeed need a pool to collect all of the money that people will be giving after service. Good going, assholes. And the 16,000 sheep who will goto this Las Vegas show in Houston will not even think twice. They will be excited for everything. They will see it as a gift to God. It burns me up, because if they weren't such greedy hypocrites, they could be helping a lot of people who need it. After all, is that not the Christian way?

Intelligent Design And A Site Idea

Here is a very well written column from the LA Times in which David P. Barash, who is a professor of psychology at the University of Washington weighs in on intelligent design.

I'm not going to write a 500 word essay on why the idea of creationism is bullshit. I think it's fairly obvious to mostly everyone, even Christians. Since they denounced the first half of the Bible. Isn't that how it works? Isn't that why religious fanatics aren't stoning their children? I'm not quite clear on that. Either way, this professor of psychology makes some very good points. And the headline for the article is this: "Does God Have Back Problems Too?" Yes, I snicker like a squirrel every time I read that line.

I just spent about 30 minutes looking for a good story to talk about, and I couldn't find one. I guess Sunday night isn't the best time to be looking for a hot story. Everything else is old news. So instead, I'm going to talk about a new idea I have. It would be a weekly, maybe even a daily feature on TheSick.net. It will simply be called "Making Fun of The Bible". I've already written pages and pages of hilarious commentary of the bible. I literally started on Genesis and whenever I came across something absurd or something contradicted by modern science, I wrote down my comments. I think this content would serve much better on this site than sitting all by its lonesome on my hard drive.

I mean, the Bible is an almost endless news story to me. In the sense that I'll read a story and these internal sensors I have are triggered and I just start writing what I'm thinking and then what you read on the site is the result. The same thing happens when I read just one page of the Bible. So I definitely believe that I could make a feature like that very interesting. But then anti-religious views would be so much of a prominent part of my site, and I don't necessarily want that.

I want to talk about a lot of different things, and not just stick to 2-3 personal crusades. Sure, protecting the constitution and assaulting religious fanatics is a top priority for me. But just have much more to say. So I really don't know. It's something I need to think about. I also don't want to just be about offending people. I enjoy offending idiots and I really enjoy when smart people agree with me. Having a daily feature in which I make fun of a small part of the Bible is an easy way to get smart people mad at me, which is what I don't want. However, it could lead for some extremely interesting interpretation and discussions of the Bible that have never taken place before.

Like I said, I just don't know if it's a good idea for my site. I will have to think about this. I'm honestly leaning towards not doing it. I mean, I know it would be extremely hilarious writing and very entertaining. But I've just got a feeling that it's not a good idea.

Thanks!

Today is the 10th, and as of this moment I have 8,212 hits for the month of July. That completely shatters my record of 3,651 hits in January of 2005. I want to thank everyone who's reading the site very much. I also want to especially thank everyone who keeps coming back. I'm beyond appreciative. Even to the assholes who come around and leave rude comments, I thank you guys too.

My goal with this site was always solid growth. That's all I wanted... Was to have just a few more hits every month. In May of 2004 I had 143 hits. And now I'm up to 8,212. It's just amazing to me, and I hope to keep as many as you new readers as possible.

Here's the most amazing part to me. I thought that the day Joseph Duncan was caught, and the couple days after would be the the biggest days I would get and I started mentally preparing myself to see a big drop in readers. Well, every single day I get more and more hits. The day he was caught, the 2nd I had 638 page views. On the 8th, I had 2,141. I won't know yesterday's stats until later tonight. This is just so insane to me, and I'm really happy people are reading.

Anyways, I just wanted to say thank you to all of the new people checking out the site. I'm very grateful. Tonight, I should get back to my standard style of talking about good stories instead of telling my own.

Goodbye 4th Amendment (Fucked With Again)

Before I went to work today, I gathered up a few good stories to talk about when I got home. Well, I won't be talking about them right now because of course, I have been fucked with again. This story, which happened to me, combines both of my most recent posts. Our freedoms being fucked away and police officers fucking with me. Did you think I was kidding about everything I said in those posts? Check this out then.

I was working. I deliver pizzas. I drive a very fast, very nice looking car. I'm on my way to a delivery and I pass a cop. I'm not speeding. No big deal. I then pass that same cop on my way back, and he pulls me over. My tag lights were out, and I knew it, so I figured that's what it was for. No big deal. So he walks up to my car, and I promptly hand him all the shit I know he's going to ask me for and treat him extremely politely, addressing him as officer. He's being all cool, and tells me my tag lights are out and he's just going to give me a warning. Everything is proceeding as normal. He then goes back to his car to give me my warning. So I just sit and wait.

But when he comes back to my car, for some unexplainable reason, he is a completely different cop. I see he is back, but has nothing in his hands. He starts by saying "First of all, I'm going to give you a warning for having an aftermarket exhaust system. It is illegal to modify your exhaust system in the state of Florida." He says this in such a dickish way. As if me having an exhaust system on my car, that gives my car more power, absolutely disgusts him. He then asks me if I mind if he searches my car. I politely tell him that I am working right now, and that I do not have the time to let him search my car. I have the right to be secure in my property, and I fucking know it. I want to just punch this fuck in this face at the point, just for stereotyping me and having the nerve to ask to serve my car when he fucking knows I'm working. But I remain polite. He then goes back to his car.

And then, another cop pulls up. Now I'm getting really pissed. It's been 10 minutes since I was pulled over and I need to get back to work. But deep down, I know exactly what is about to happen because it's happened to me before. It shocks me every time. The cop comes back and just tells me to turn my interior lights on and put my hands on the steering wheel. Remember this detail, because it's an important one and it'll come up later. The second cop then walks his K9 "drug sniffing" dog around my car. And what do you expect happens next?

I am informed that the dog "alerted" to my vehicle, and they're going to search it. I have no say. I am now forced to let who I now see are the soldiers of the Imperial United States to search my car. I am told to get out of my car, and go stand by theirs. Then I have to stand there for an additional 15 minutes while they search literally every square inch of my car. All while I'm left standing there, on the main highway in the town I work, looking like a douche bag. For 15 minutes. Maybe longer.

I don't do drugs. I never have. I have never even tried any recreational drug. In fact, excluding weed, I've never seen an illegal drug in person. I am very anti-drug. I don't like people who do drugs. I think they fucking suck. Excluding marijuana, anyone who uses a drug is a fucking idiot and a pussy. And this is the person who's car is being thoroughly searched for drugs. He almost cummed in his pants when he found a few aspirin that had fell out of my Man Purse™. He goes "OHHH what do we have here, sir". I reply, with "That's Aspirin..." I said it in the funniest way. In a "I can't believe just how fucking stupid you are" sort of way. The other cop actually laughed at the way I said it.

So after this guy was done ravaging my car, he gives me my warning and I fucking leave. I'm so irate at this point, because I can only be polite and respectful for so long while I'm watching my constitutional amendments being fucked. But let's get down to brass tacks now, and expose this tag team and what exactly they did.

This is the 4th time this has happened to me. I got into a full blown argument with a cop on my own property one time, but that's another story just as long as this one. The fact of the matter is, this always happens to me because I'm always stereotyped and prejudged because I drive a fast car. So with that said, I've been through this a lot and I know my shit. Not to mention the fact that I know someone who is a cop and he explained to me exactly how the dogs are able to smell drugs in the car. It requires that the windows be rolled up all the way. Then, refined air slips through the smallest of cracks in the car's design and the dog is able to fully concentrate and determine wether he smells any things he's been trained to pick up on.

So what does this mean? This means that these two cops tag teamed me and only claimed that the dog alerted to my car just because they really thought I had drugs in my car. That's why they searched it for so long, because they didn't want to be wrong. They lied. I could see it in their fucking eyes when they told me the dog alerted to it. When I began to roll up my window and he told me I didn't have to, I knew right there that I was being fucked with. And this is how they get their probable cause so that they can search my car.

4th Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

I would argue (and I have gotten into a heated argument with a police officer about this before) that walking the dog around my car in the first place is searching. But I really don't want to get into that, because I just don't need to. The fact of the matter is, they lied so they could skirt the 4th amendment and search my car. This is how freedom dies. This is how an Imperial Government operates. My county's police department is shit in my eyes, now. This is the 4th time this has happened to me. I've had a dog walked around my car 5 times, and 4 of those times the dog has "alerted". And over and over again, the police officers tell me that the dogs are "100%" and "They don't make mistakes". Well, I've never had any drugs in my car ever. Period.

If you can't see how these officers raped the Constitution that protects us, then you are blind. There is no argument to be made here. I was wronged, and I'm fucking fed up with this happening to me. I have the right to be secure and free from unreasonable fucking searches. I have a perfectly clean criminal and driving record. Regardless, again and again I am stereotyped and fucked with. What amendment will they rape next? I've already had my 1st and 4th amendment fucked with in two days time. This is absurd. Ben Franklin is spinning in his fucking grave. If he were alive today, he would have these officers thrown in jail. I hate seeing anyone's rights being fucked with. And when it happens to me, I just don't know what to do. I'm irate, and I'm tired of being fucking harassed.

Update: Why didn't anyone tell me I confused the 4th and 5th amendments? I had that wrong for days!

Dennis Is Owning Me

Well this fucking sucks. Two seperate times I have began talking about a pretty good story and both fucking times the power surges on and off when I'm in the middle of it. I said fuck it. I'm not even going to try until this shit calms down. But now I'm trying again, just not talking about something that I would be too pissed off about if I lost it.

I went and took some pictures of the insane rain and the trees bending in ways they shouldn't be bending, but they didn't turn out too well. I am right on the Gulf coast of Florida, about 75 miles north of Tampa. I may lose power. In which case, I won't be commenting on anything. Now I'm going to find something to blog about again, since it seems to be calming down.

Idaho Police Fuck With My Personal Life

I just got home from work, and as of right now I have 33 new comments in the last 8 hours that I need to read and reply to. But they will all have to wait because something very serious happened to me today, and every Blogger out there needs to pay very close attention to this post.

For the past 8 hours, I have been thinking of what I'm going to say in this post. I have been thinking about how I will begin it, because it's such a major event. But there's no slick intro that I can possibly think of. So sit back and relax and be prepared to here one fucked up true story.

I got to work at 5:00 PM. I walked in, and a girl from my work told me that she saw my site and told me how hilarious my anti-religious comments were. That put me in a really, really good mood. It's one thing for people to tell you your site rules online. It's another when they're right in front of you. So like I said, I was in a very good mood, but not for long...

About 30 seconds later, my boss who is the owner of the place I work at says that he needs to talk to me in the office. My heart drops, and I think "What the fuck did I do?" I quickly reassured myself that I haven't done anything wrong and calmed myself rather quickly. Boy, was I wrong.

Let me first point out that I greatly look up to this man, and he will probably be the best boss I ever have in my entire life. That's how awesome this guy is. Anyways, my boss, the boss of bosses, the owner of my store, my employer informs me that a female detective from Idaho called him on his unlisted home phone to inform him that I was making threats against on my website.

I need to clarify something. In February, I worked at Store Y, and Boss Y was the manager. I was forced to quit because I could no longer take Boss Y's abuse. So I quit... and about a month later I called I called up Boss X. Boss X owns Store Y and Store Z. He is the man. He was kind enough to let me come back to work at Store Z, where I worked before I transferred to Store Y. My comment in February was directed towards the abusive Boss Y. I know it's confusing without being able to mention the store name and location but I really can't do that anymore. I hope that's enough to follow. You might have to read it one more time to get it. I can't mention names, so it I'm really forced to be very evasive.

Anyways... How they could possibly do this is unknown to me. Did they use the Patriot Act? Quite possibly.

The post in question is this one. Made on February 13th, 2005. That is 5 months ago. I'll copy and paste exactly what I said that caused a detective in Idaho to call my employer and "warn" him:

Im Posting From My Cell Phone At Work. It Was Supposed To Be My Day Off. I Want To Kill. I Hate This Fucking Place. My Boss Is A Moody Cunt. I Want Her To Get The Hiv. I Could Never Be So Lucky

That's it. I made a post from my cell phone during a smoke break at work. I was pissed off because my boss at that store was degrading me and embarrassing me in front of co-workers and customers. I was also pissed off because it was my only day off that week and I had to come in and work for some reason. I don't remember. So instead of bitching at her, going off on her, being rude to a customer, or being rude to co-workers, I simply did a little bit of venting on my blog via my cell phone so I would not do any of that. I used to have very bad anger problems but I've learned to control them very well. But that's beside the point.

What did I say in that post that would give a detective cause to call the owner of my place of employment? Who, I might add, should be working on the Joseph Duncan case, possibly figuring out how this man wasn't a suspect when he was a current fugitive accused of child molestation. The answer if very simple.

I said nothing wrong. I said "I want to kill". I didn't say I wanted to kill anybody. I didn't even mention the name of the person I was talking about! I said "I want to kill" in reference to the fact that I had to work on my only day off that week, and I was just saying those exact words to point out my frustration with the fact that I had work more than 7 days in a row. I then mentioned that my boss was being a "moody cunt". Well, she was, and it's the truth. What can I say? I didn't call her a cunt, because I wouldn't insult my boss to their face. I also said I hope she gets "the HIV". That is said as in "the hihv". When I say it in that sense, in that style, isn't obvious I'm not serious? Do I really want her to get the HIV virus? Of course not. Does anyone really think I want someone who was simply rude and treated me like shit to gets AIDS? Of course not. It was a playful, sarcastic, exaggerated insult.

But forget all that. Can someone point out the threat to me? Because I'm having a really hard time seeing any cause to hunt down a blogger's employer and attempt to get him fired by informing him of content on my website. My website has absolutely nothing to do with my work. They are completely unrelated. This is the internet. This blog is my way to entertain people, make them laugh, and inform them. For a law enforcement officer in a completely different state to call my work and fuck with my personal life is a very serious injustice.

I know what's really going on here. If you read my comments in that post, you will see a whole lot of extremely hardcore anti-religious rhetoric. I obviously pissed some detective in Idaho. I obviously offended them. They had absolutely no right whatsoever to use their law enforcement powers to barge into not just my personal life, but my work life. This is my income here. When they chose to call my employer and to "warn him of threats and content on my website", they tried to get me fired.

That's right. That is what I believe. There was no serious cause for concern in that post. Nothing could be construed as threatening. I wasn't threatening. I was venting about being treated like shit and being pissed off that I had to work so much. This was also when my bipolar was untreated, so I was an emotional wreck at this time. But I'm getting off the subject. The fact of the matter is that I offended someone who is a law enforcement officer in Idaho, and they decided they were going to abuse their power and try to get me fired.

Too bad for them that I have the most fucking amazing boss in the world, and he completely understands what I'm all about. He knows me. They probably thought I was talking about him. I bet they were pretty shocked when he informed them that I no longer work with the person who that post was about. If they really thought I was a threat, they would have read more than one post on my blog and realized that I switched to a different store owned by the same man because I emotionally could not handle working with this woman. I am very, very grateful to my employer for not firing me. Because if I were him, I would have fired me.

And because of that fact, I know that I would be jobless right now if I didn't have such an awesome boss. All because of a pissed off Idaho police officer who felt like using their police powers to screw with someone who offended them on the internet. That's real nice. I can't wait until tomorrow, when I call every county in Idaho and find out who is responsible for this and demand an apology. I will keep everyone fully updated on this situation.

In the mean time, I have to go through over 300 posts I've made and take out any references to where I work, and also make a huge new disclaimer that will be on the main page as to prevent this from ever happening to me again. I will not be fucked with in my real life because of what I say on the internet. I will not back down. I will not change the way I write. I will not be intimidated by pissed off cops who want to deny me of my 1st amendment right. I will continue being me, no matter what happens.

I may even contact a lawyer on Monday. Who knows. I hope I'm even allowed to be telling this story. This might even be confidential... I don't even know now. If I find out it is, I might have to delete this. Sorry guys, but the person who employs me has the final say when it comes to this story. But I'm pretty sure it's cool to talk about.

I just can't believe this is happening. I can't believe that the people who failed to connect the dots are fucking with my personal life just because I offended them with a little anti-religious rhetoric. This is how they came across that post though... Something is messed up with my Blogger profile page, which you can see by clicking my face up there. It shows my most recent post as... Yep, you guessed it, the post in question. That was 5 months ago. A time when I was in an emotional hell and when I had an illness that was being treated with a drug that actually makes the illness worse. Anti-depressants for someone with bipolar is a recipe for disaster. I went through hell because of a Doctor's ignorance. And that was all at this exact time. Trust me, I was acting very very well given everything I was dealing with.

I would like any and everyone to comment on this post, and give me their honest opinion on this situation. I can count on the regular commentators to, but I really need you casual visitors to just take a couple minutes out and let me know what you think. I will be printing out this entire post, along with every comment and I will mail it, fax it, and email it to the police department that is responsible for this, once I find out. I will not back down, and I will not be pushed around by people who spit on the constitution. I can be investigated in and out. I have nothing. I don't commit crimes. I've got not one skeleton in my closet. So I encourage all the investigation from any other police officers who are offended by my rhetoric. You will find absolutely nothing. I have a feeling this isn't the end. And I have a feeling I'm in for a big fight. In closing...

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. I didn't even have to copy and paste that. I know it by heart. Believe that.